Mr. Ridgeston Goes To Hollywood (FL.)

Posted November 29, 2006 11:10 PM by with 50 comments

bel ami lucas ridgeston gay pornSeems the timing on yesterday’s entry wasn’t that off. Christmas came early this year for porn fans in South Florida who were treated to a rare four nights of live performances by Lucas Ridgeston at the Boardwark in Ft. Lauderdale.

Fabscout Agent Howard Marr, who set up the event, gushed, “He was the sweetest, most charming and unassuming guy I have met in a while.”

I distinctly remember being rendered speechless when I met Cool Blue at San Francisco Gay Pride two years ago as well.

Pictures after the jump …lucas_ridgeston_porn_1.jpg

lucas_rideston_gay_porn.jpg
Above photos courtesy PornForPatric.Net

lucas_ridgeston_gay_porn_2.jpg

lucas_ridgeston_gay_porn_3.jpg
Above photos courtesy Fabscout.

Jack

50 responses to Mr. Ridgeston Goes To Hollywood (FL.)

  1. Anonymous November 30th, 2006 at 12:07 AM

    why are we still concerned with Lucas?

    Reply

  2. Gary November 30th, 2006 at 2:11 AM

    Because he’s drop dead gorgeous.

    Reply

  3. Ahvus November 30th, 2006 at 2:46 AM

    I too think we’re quite done with him. He’s not that goodlooking anymore, I mean he’s gotten a bit out of shape, he getting older and most of all, he had a worn out coke face to be frank. Still cute though, but not enough to keep posting him.

    Reply

  4. AJ November 30th, 2006 at 6:11 AM

    OMG, ok, now I never got into the whole Lukas thing back in the day, but now? Yowza. He’s lost all that baby look and turned into a man. Nice. He also managed to keep those startling eyes. So, three appendages up…

    Reply

  5. el cid November 30th, 2006 at 7:04 AM

    because he’s still hot as hell?

    Reply

  6. brian kin November 30th, 2006 at 8:22 AM

    i loveee lucas… :-) he’s the first porn star that i watched 8 years ago and it’s all coming back. he’s rock!

    Reply

  7. Jack November 30th, 2006 at 8:34 AM

    Why not? He’s still gorgeous even though a bit more mature. There is beauty and sex after 22.

    Reply

  8. Tim November 30th, 2006 at 9:02 AM

    Some of the many things i love about this site is your ability to cover all aspects of porn and have the in depth out of character interviews with the stars that are usually revealing.
    However that being said, this is the second piece you have had on this guy this week…enough already move on!

    Reply

  9. jonathan November 30th, 2006 at 10:09 AM

    wowie-wow-wow.

    Please, keep posting about him.

    You can post about him every day for all I care.

    He is gorgeous. Period.

    Thank you thank you!

    Reply

  10. Anonymous November 30th, 2006 at 11:51 AM

    Lucas is actually cuter than he was when he first arrived on the scene! I know many of the dimwits on here are into twinks but they need to shut up for a minute and expand their vocabularies.

    I’m sure I’ll be called “jealous” for this. “You’re just jealous!” (or as the idiots write it: “your just jelous!”) seems to be the all-purpose retort for those little, illiterate twits. Notice how it never makes any sense.

    Anyway, I’d like to see Lucas begin a new chapter in his porn career. It’s nice to see men fucking men, not twentysomethings fucking post adolescents.

    Here’s to the future of Lucas the DILF!

    Reply

  11. Anonymous November 30th, 2006 at 11:56 AM

    There have only been TWO posts about Lucas so WHY the hell are these stupid twinks complaining?!??!

    Does meth shorten the attention span that dramatically? Are the TWO posts making their skin itch and lights in the room look all weird?!?!

    Or is it because they’re all stuck out in the sticks and THIS BLOG is their ONLY lifeline to anything sexual and gay???!?

    TWO posts about the same thing – OH NO, the mall is closed, too – now how will I entertain myself??!?!

    Sheesh!

    What the hell is wrong with people!?!

    Reply

  12. Buzz November 30th, 2006 at 12:49 PM

    The years are treating Lucas well. Cute boys rarely grow into handsome men, but Mr. R. is truly an exception. I’m not surprised that the net whiners have inevitably scraped the bottom of the whinge barrel and found ways to complain. Sheesh.

    Reply

  13. pecker November 30th, 2006 at 3:03 PM

    That is some funny ( and true) shit that the poster from 11:56 wrote. FUNNY!!!! and for the ones that state that he is old and out of shape, well I only hope I look half that good when age and weight catch up with all of us.

    Reply

  14. Frank November 30th, 2006 at 5:07 PM

    Lucas is drop dead gorgeous so why are people saying that he is out of shape and older? WHERE? I don’t see anything wrong with him whatsoever.

    Reply

  15. T and R November 30th, 2006 at 5:35 PM

    Not into Bel Ami as they are way too young and too skinny – but now that he is all grown up he looks amazing, wish he would ditch the whole Bel Ami thing and move on.

    Reply

  16. Jamie November 30th, 2006 at 7:15 PM

    Are there any GAY spots in Willmar,Hutchinson, Litchfield or surrounding area in Minnesota. I NEED ONE BADLY..

    Reply

  17. dan November 30th, 2006 at 8:57 PM

    wow, what i coould do to you

    Reply

  18. Anonymous November 30th, 2006 at 10:48 PM

    Wow, does 11:56 have his g string in a bunch or what ? Who said anything about twink or sticks or meth ? Someone doesn’t have issues, guy you have subscriptions! It’s a free country pal we can say that two stories back to back is enough, no one is knocking his looks at all! He does look good but, so do alot of other faces you have not seen in a while. One story on him then onto the next subject seems fair. Get off your soapbox there and check into anger management classes.

    Reply

  19. Scott December 1st, 2006 at 12:34 AM

    Lucas is one of those guys that just seem to get hotter as they age. I thought he was hot when he came on the scene, but WOW!!!!! He can come over to my house and spend some time with me anytime!!!

    Reply

  20. Anonymous December 1st, 2006 at 1:15 PM

    Hey 10:48,

    If we’re “checking into classes” you might want to look into a remedial English course. There is no such word as “alot”, moron. Most people learn that one by the Fourth Grade.

    Try reading the posts just a bit more carefully. Idiots like you were not only complaining about there being a mere TWO posts about the same subject (Heaven forbid!) but were saying that Lucas looks “old” and has a “coke face.”

    You seem like one of those intellectually flaccid fools who chalk any strong opinion about anything up to someone being “angry.” Just because you’re stupid (apparently illiterate) and apathetic doesn’t make those of us who aren’t “angry” and if we were it would surely be a bi-product of dealing with twits like you, dear.

    Reply

  21. Ray December 1st, 2006 at 3:01 PM

    I too agree that Lucas is getting better looking as he ages. Every new pic I see of him pushes my buttons. Many of the young guys don’t know how to have a conversation with you, all they want is your money. Let me tell you, Lucas is a pro in this business and a genuine good guy. I am in hopes that he will unretire his video career and move back in front of the camera one more time. Good Luck-Good Life My Friend, you have treated your fans well.

    Reply

  22. Anonymous December 1st, 2006 at 5:05 PM

    LOL

    Oh big vocabulary, guess that makes up for the short short…temper. Ok moving on.
    If you would read my first comment you would see that “coke face” or “old” were never in my original post.
    He is a good looking guy i just said that twice was enough and then you go on some insane rant.

    I’m glad your the grammer police on this site telling people how to spell this or that. You also probably read the skin mags just to point out any mispelled words or how many double spaces were used in a story.
    Back to the basics…4 people say something negative about one porn star and you fly off the deep end ? Get a grip! We all have our own ideas about what is hot, who is too much etc and if you don’t like it thats fine and vice versa.

    Reply

  23. lee December 3rd, 2006 at 3:23 AM

    like

    Reply

  24. Tu quoque December 3rd, 2006 at 1:50 PM

    No, he’s not an extremely good looking guy anymore. He’s average, and he’s getting a bit of a belly and hips. I’m not ageist, it’s just reality needs to occur to some of the older posters here. He’s certainly not unattractive, though.

    Reply

  25. Timbo December 3rd, 2006 at 4:20 PM

    Lucas was my first crush – and man, after seeing these pics, is still my crush some 8 years later.

    You always remember your first! ;)

    Reply

  26. Anonymous December 5th, 2006 at 1:12 AM

    5:05,

    On second thought, I just can’t condescend to argue any further with someone so intellectually deficient. It would be one thing if you were bright and had just fallen through the decidedly wide cracks of the educational system (Your grammatical and spelling “skills” speak of a learning disability.) but I get the sense that you’re just another willfully ignorant, illiterate hick.

    People like you just don’t matter off-line (as it should be) so in the interest of symmetry. . .

    Reply

  27. Anonymous December 5th, 2006 at 2:09 AM

    “No, he’s not an extremely good looking guy anymore. He’s average, and he’s getting a bit of a belly and hips. I’m not ageist, it’s just reality needs to occur to some of the older posters here. He’s certainly not unattractive, though.”

    I’M NOT AN IDIOT BUT I PLAY ONE ON THIS BLOG. . .

    Reply

  28. tu quoque December 5th, 2006 at 10:59 PM

    I can and will assume that the degenerate who posted the second to last entry also posted the last. Specifically, the following is addressed to the one THAT typed the last.

    You, shemp, are a pathetic quasi literate neanderthal. Your semblance of education has enabled you to achieve what on this message board? Defend a ONCE attractive performer who wouldn’t piss on you if you were on fire? And how have you demonstrated your pathological loyalty? Well, you’ve committed several grammatical and rhetorical mistakes. Ad hominem is one of quite a few. If you want to defend the image that played so central a role in what I can only assume was your white trash adolescence, address the criticisms not the criticizer. The only propositions you’ve successfully defended here are that you’ve never had a life and don’t know how to use a comma. Before your inner (and outer) troll starts to cry hypocrisy on my part, save up your disability checks and buy a dictionary–or wiki.

    Didja ever think (and I could stop here because I already know the answer to that question) you’d be passionately inveighing against a person who sleighted your favorite pornstar when you believed that your life had potential?

    have a great day.

    Reply

  29. Anonymous December 7th, 2006 at 12:51 PM

    Dear tu quoque,

    At exactly whom are you leveling your pleonastic rant? Are you upset with the little, illiterate hick who protested two features about Lucas or are you angry at the person who called him out for it? Perhaps you are the little, illiterate hick and that misguided attempt at riposte is just an elaborate, though badly constructed, rouse. If that is indeed the case then I’m very pleased that you’ve obtained a theasarus and a dictionary. Christmas has come early for you and that’s always nice to hear.

    Before you rush to attack my reading comprehension skills or my usage, I urge you to proofread your diatribe. Next time you should try to be concise instead of rambling on about other people’s errors while at the same time creating a catalog of your own.

    Oh well, you probably won’t heed any of this. You seem to be quite sure of your infallibility. Children and fools usually are. Which one are you?

    If the answer is the latter then maybe you should consider running for political office. Apparently Mark Foley’s district takes very kindly to poseurs.

    You can do it!

    Reply

  30. wow December 7th, 2006 at 2:07 PM

    Don’t you just love pseudo intellectuals like tu quoque, who fancy themselves learned because unlike the other Wal-mart greeters they’ve actually finished a book – once?

    I know I do.

    *BIG sigh*

    Reply

  31. HC December 7th, 2006 at 4:20 PM

    I think he’s got a great body. There’s something a little unsettling about his face in the last picture, though.

    Reply

  32. wow December 7th, 2006 at 10:06 PM

    HC,

    I know what you mean but I think it’s the fake smile. I hope that’s not due to plastic surgery. It would be extremely sad if he had done such a thing in order to appeal to a bunch of tiresome circuit queens (who have turned on him anyway). His career should have moved beyond that point by now.

    I do like the older body. It’s fit without looking like a muscle poodle and has a bit of heft. I find that very sexy but it’s not everyone’s cup of tea.

    Reply

  33. Tu Quoque December 7th, 2006 at 11:17 PM

    12:51,

    Is it your habit to accuse people of committing grammatical errors without providing examples? No I won’t proofread it, because the only errors made were typos; rendering your “observations” petty. What you’re probably referring to was intentional, It.

    You hear voices?

    wow,

    That’ll do, wow, that’ll do. Pseudo intellectual used as a criticism is pseudo intellectual.
    —————
    That coked out face is really unsettling. He looks like he’s ready to tweak and get violent; maybe it’s meth. And he’s turning into a bear. I’m sure that’s all very comforting to those posters who are losing or have lost the bloom of youth, viz., practically all of you.

    Reply

  34. Anonymous December 9th, 2006 at 10:36 AM

    Poor Tu Ququoe,

    I have to wonder if you’ve even read the linguistic seizures you pound out on here. I wonder because you seem to have a tendency to accuse other people of your foibles.

    Oh well – ultimately, it (like you) doesn’t matter.

    You just seem to be overcome when anyone figures you out or isn’t intimidated by your aggression.

    Not to get all “Bill Frist” but it seems like you suffer from Asperger syndrome.

    Do you really need people on a porn blog to be entranced by you? That’s not you. It’s the illness. Trying to cast aspersions on other’s grammar while making error after error of your own is not you. It’s the illness.

    You should take the time spent writing your clumsy little polemics and get some treatment.

    Really, I’m worried about you. I imagine life in the sticks must be particularly challenging when one suffers as you do.

    Hang in there.

    Reply

  35. wow December 9th, 2006 at 10:40 AM

    Ha!

    Oh my god!

    Tu quoque, self-important master of eloquence basically retorted, “I know you are but what am I?!!”

    Ha!

    What a poseur!

    They always betray themselves in the end.

    Wow!

    Reply

  36. Wow December 9th, 2006 at 11:22 PM

    We’re well into December and with Christmas fast approaching I’ve decided to exercise some “. . . goodwill toward men.”

    I was going to wait for another clichéd
    harangue from this thread’s resident angry little poseur, Tu Quoque, so I could further expose him for what he is. However, I’ve been on the net for some while, during which I’ve learned that this kind of posturing can go on forever unless sense prevails and someone puts a stop to it. I’ve also taken into to account the tenor of his, let’s call them speeches. If I were to continue to argue with someone like that I would essentially be giving him the attention he so desperately craves while indirectly subjecting all other readers to the excruciating tedium of Tu Quoque’s feverish quest for significance. None of that sounds very Christmassy, now does it?

    That said – at the time of my posting this there has been no response from Tu Quoque to my 10:40 post. So I’m going to state here and now that no matter what ridiculous rejoinder of his, no matter what angry, muddled accusation, supposition or admonishment he spews I will have absolutely nothing to say in response. I can only hope that anyone else who has taken issue with l’enfant terrible will follow my lead on this.

    If stomping into an electronic schoolyard of sorts and playing the part of the nitwit bully is something that fills an emptiness within him then let’s leave him to that rather pitiful way to spend the holiday season.

    Besides, I’ve got Christmas shopping to do!

    MERRY CHRISTMAS
    HAPPY HANUKKAH
    JOYOUS KWANZAA
    and a
    HAPPY NEW YEAR!

    Good-bye (to this thread),
    Wow

    Reply

  37. naina December 11th, 2006 at 5:48 PM

    This guy is so hot

    Reply

  38. Chuck December 30th, 2006 at 12:49 AM

    Nice pix but it’s kinda sad to see such a gay porn icon smiling with effing singles in his elastic. All the women I know in the business wouldn’t give a look, let alone a dance for anything under a 10 or 20.

    Reply

  39. chris January 5th, 2007 at 5:10 PM

    wow!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply

  40. baby January 7th, 2007 at 10:30 AM

    like u

    Reply

  41. remi January 9th, 2007 at 8:36 PM

    Mr. Lucas Ridgestone looks better with age…yummy

    Reply

  42. chris January 11th, 2007 at 10:40 PM

    Gawd how I love me some Lucas!

    In XXX: 30 Porn-Star Portraits, he stated he was “too old.” Not Lucas. He’s still fine.

    “Out of shape”? Are you out of your mind? the man is FINE.

    Reply

  43. humberto January 13th, 2007 at 9:22 AM

    l did like you l like ass l heve 40age my name humberto of brazil speack potugases

    Reply

  44. anthony January 13th, 2007 at 10:38 PM

    boy i would lick u all over and then suck ur cock, and the rest would fuckin for the next 2 days!

    Reply

  45. Wayne January 20th, 2007 at 11:00 PM

    All of your comments about L.Ridgestone either pro or con prove that each of you is a dimwit, especially you so-called intellectuals who are impresssing no one but yourselves. Lucas remains the most beautiful male who ever lived in the field of gay porn, and his videos with his Czechmate, Anton Paulik, are the sexiest ever filmed.

    Reply

  46. riddlemethis January 22nd, 2007 at 2:35 PM

    Wayne,

    Um, did you bother to read your own post?

    If making “pro or con” comments about Lucas only prove us “dimwits” then shouldn’t you join the dimwit club?

    I bet you could be president!

    I think Lucas gets more and more attractive with each passing year. Oops, I guess I’m a twofold “dimwit” now. Oh well. . . consider the source.

    Reply

  47. David Vasquez March 31st, 2007 at 8:29 PM

    OOOOOOO my god que lindo pene tienen, what a pretty man, could someone call me during the week and surprise me at work, when you call say you would like to place an order from david, then when i get on tell me how hard you want to fuck my asshole!!! i will say, sorry but this is a legitimate business, or something, then you tell me how much you want to come in my mouth-800-970-3529

    Reply

  48. Jeff April 22nd, 2007 at 9:16 PM

    boy i would lick u all over and then suck ur cock, and the rest would fuckin for the next 2 days!

    SAME HERE!!!!

    Reply

  49. aluka June 13th, 2007 at 11:29 AM

    let’s meet! email me! i so horny right now…

    Reply

  50. Tim Sands June 19th, 2007 at 9:19 AM

    I love cock. I love spunk.

    Reply

Leave a Reply



ABOUT US | EMAIL US