Leo Giamani Weekend: Leo in Titan’s “Playbook”

Posted February 6, 2009 7:56 PM by with 49 comments

leo_giamani_titan_playbook-9.jpg

Since watching Asylum yesterday, all I’ve been able to think about this weekend is Leo Giamani’s fat gay balls. Yesterday they were slapping Erik Rhodes’ ass, and today Leed Scott is squeezing on them for dear life while taking a ride on Leo’s disco stick in Titan’s just-released Playbook. In the gay porn clip, Leo’s just sort of sitting there — why should a dick that big and beautiful do anything — while Leed has the time of his life. God love a resourceful, hungry bottom.

leo_giamani_titan_playbook-6.jpg

Check out a free hardcore four minute clip from the scene and some more images of godlike Giamani after the jump …

leo_giamani_titan_playbook-1.jpg

leo_giamani_titan_playbook-3.jpg

leo_giamani_titan_playbook-8.jpg
leo_giamani_titan_playbook-7.jpg
leo_giamani_titan_playbook-4.jpg
leo_giamani_titan_playbook-2.jpg

More Leo Giamani:
VIDEO: Leo Giamani in “Playbook”
Leo Giamani: Our Gay Porn Archive

Tags: , , , ,

49 responses to Leo Giamani Weekend: Leo in Titan’s “Playbook”

  1. malisse8991 February 7th, 2009 at 4:03 PM

    I think Leed Scott is much hotter in the film.

    Reply

  2. Marco February 7th, 2009 at 5:33 PM

    Ok finally me and gaypornblog have something in common… both in love with Leo Giamani. He seems to be everywhere and I still cant get enough. I dare anyone to name a gay porn star with his looks, body, huge cock, and bull balls.
    Thanks for letting me know Leo is in Playbook because I usually dont check out Titan videos. How the hell did they pass on Leo not getting the box cover? Titan just lost thousands of DVD sales by not putting Leo on the cover.

    Reply

  3. anon February 7th, 2009 at 9:37 PM

    Originally Posted by JizzGuzz:
    “I read that mightymen updated their site to indicate the bottoming scene was shot before the Jake Cruise bareback scene. Leo is hot, but it does kill the fantasy that he’s been with Jake Cruise. Leo’s good looks cause him to stand out but seeing him mounting Jake Cruise made my eyes burn.”

    It’s quite aggravating. The barebacking is the tip of the iceberg.

    He claims to be G4P.

    Claims made were..he went pre-med and tested high for MCAT’s. Now why would you want to do porn instead of a lucrative job with respect as a doctor?

    He also was an escort, I’ve seen a profile of his online for some San Diego escort web site. Probably were Jake recruited him for his web site-why he has such low standards in the looks department. You probably have to have sex with a lot of older fat guys to make the bills as an escort.

    How do you find time to escort and study to become a doctor. This guy’s bio has changed so much from Fireman, Policeman, Pre-med student it is annoying.

    In the looks department he is a winner, but in life just another loser. He will probably burn out before he hits 35.

    Reply

  4. crankier February 8th, 2009 at 7:38 AM

    Too bad his agent let him dip his toe into Titan waters.

    Reply

  5. rob February 8th, 2009 at 9:38 AM

    That’s a pretty hot and awesome camera angle… you have to admit.

    Reply

  6. Anonymous February 8th, 2009 at 11:15 AM

    Leo Giamani is fast becoming the Ben Affleck of gay porn, enough.

    Reply

  7. Tom February 8th, 2009 at 11:35 AM

    Leo is very pretty and has a big cock… but the real interest in the video clip is the guy getting fucked… Leo obviously thinks all he needs is a big cock… but he just sits there while the other guy does all the action… I’ll take that hot ass who has real sex appeal over that do-nothing cock any day… Leo is just another pretty face that lies back and says “do me.” In a few years (months?) we’ll be seeing the new video where he finally bottoms for the “first time”… for the camera, that is.

    Reply

  8. Jeff February 8th, 2009 at 12:33 PM

    I had lunch with Keith Webb of Titan about four years ago and he bragged how that Titan would NEVER use a gay for pay model or a model that did not self identify as gay.

    It makes me giggle that over the last couple years more and more gay for pay models have shown up in Titan films. Hooray for Keith’s and Titan’s “famous” integrity.

    Reply

  9. Ass Freak February 8th, 2009 at 2:28 PM

    giamani is one of the worst models around : booooooring, the guy who’s taking it up the ass though, well he’s a STUNNER!!!!Awfully good-looking and good bottom skills: hot

    Reply

  10. cranky February 8th, 2009 at 3:31 PM

    Altho I do find Leio Giamani hot – are there any other porn stars this blog likes?

    It’s all Leo, Diesel Washington (ugh) and Damien Crosse.

    Isn’t there anyone else you think is hot you can focus on? it’s getting boring.

    Reply

  11. Laughing February 8th, 2009 at 5:48 PM

    So, tell me you bunch of wise and wordly porn experts; what’s the difference between Jeff Stryker and Leo Giamani? I’ll give you my opinion; the competition today is no where near what it was when Jeff was all anybody could think about. It seems that if Studio A gets what Studio B, C, D, E, F and G wanted the prissy-assed bitter claws come out and all of a sudden the same traits that made someone like Jeff a huge star are the very traits someone like Leo is being torn down for. It’s the competing studios that are hating on him, not the consumer. You’re all way too obvious because you talk too much and everyone knows you wanted him. Consumers wouldn’t bother writing such PASSIONATE negative crap about a performer they could care less about, there’s just way too much porn out there for them to like and get off to.

    Reply

  12. cranky February 8th, 2009 at 6:51 PM

    To Lauging -I am a consumer and not involved in the industry at all.

    PS: To answer your question – Jeff Stryker’s appeal was all about attitude and a big cock. There were better looking men, better bodies – but he had that swagger. so much so it looks kinda hilarious now.

    Leo – well he kinda looks bored in comparison. but I do think he’s hot.

    Reply

  13. Fake id February 9th, 2009 at 5:24 AM

    Too Much of him and he is not a good model, hot but really, really terrible at gay porn, so what is the point. Gay porn is nothing short of sex dolls on film, they are so boring and lifeless. Straight guys take all the gay sexuality out of gay porn rendering it useless and dead.

    He needs to fuck off and do straight porn, he might be better at it, because he is boring shit when it comes to gay stuff.

    And didn’t Titan go off on a big supercilious anti-bareback rant a while back, saying under no circumstances would they use bb models.

    Gay porn is fast going down the drain.

    Reply

  14. Spongey February 9th, 2009 at 6:58 AM

    I think we have to blame the director if the actor are looking bored or passive. Isn’t that his job, to direct.

    I think Leo is smoldering and I never get enough of him. I think he stated on his live show at RB, that he was Bi. I don’t know about all the other stuff. And frankly I don’t care, he’s just dead sexy too me.

    Reply

  15. davey February 9th, 2009 at 8:03 AM

    Didnt they shoot this like in July of 08? What takes so damn long to roll out a film?

    Reply

  16. Keith Webb February 9th, 2009 at 9:37 AM

    Let me clear a few things up….

    1. We shot Leo’s scene several months ago, before he filmed the bareback scenes with other companies. We also came to find out later that Leo wasn’t exactly forthcoming about all the scenes that he had actually filmed. Because he went on to do bareback films we made the decision not to promote him or his persona on the boxcover. You will not see Leo appearing in any future Titan films.

    2. From our talks with Leo he did not identify himself as “gay for pay” or even “straight”, it was clear he was bisexual. Too many people believe the phony marketing about all these “straight” and “gay for pay” performers…80% of it is bullshit and not true. If you saw his performance it’s clear he liked what he’s doing, he’s not that good of an actor! He is clearly bi-sexual and likes what he is doing. We do not have any issue working with bi-sexual guys.

    3. Why did it take so long for the film to come out? Because we make content that requires more than a quick edit and then gets thrown onto the internet. We also work on several projects at the same time, shooting multiple scenes for different films. Average time from the filming of the first scene to the release of the title is anywhere from 4-6 months.

    I know there are people that just love to try and find anything they can to bash us. I actually appreciate it because they keep us on our toes and true to our commitments. So, keep it coming guys it only makes us stronger!

    Reply

  17. not me, oh noes February 9th, 2009 at 9:49 AM

    Well, Jeff, you’re right about integrity’s divorce from Titan vis–à–vis gfp and bb models (which you didn’t mention, but goes hand-in-hand). Then again, we don’t really know if integrity and Titan ever were together; just because Keith runs around saying they’re a couple doesn’t mean they’ve exchanged promise rings. Sounds like Laughing has this crowd nailed.

    Reply

  18. Cock Addict February 9th, 2009 at 11:45 AM

    possibly hot as a straight porn star but terribly BOOOOOORING in gay porn.
    have toa dmit the guy who takes it up his ass in the trailer is what we need besides OTHER and BETTER directors who do have a clue

    Reply

  19. fake id February 9th, 2009 at 1:49 PM

    Leo has identified as straight on many sites, your post Keith implies you are merely assuming he is bisexual.

    “It’s clear he liked what he’s doing” well it’s very unfortunate that has never came across on screen.

    But I guess his sexuality is a moo point, whether he is straight or bi, he is still a boring “fuck”, and a boring fuck is a boring fuck.

    Reply

  20. noname February 9th, 2009 at 7:05 PM

    “the prissy-assed bitter claws come out and all of a sudden the same traits that made someone like Jeff a huge star are the very traits someone like Leo is being torn down for.”

    Someone(??Maybe Leo Giamani??…I’m sure the douche googles himself, & frequents these blogs) brought up Jeff Stryker this aforementioned post.

    I’d like to give a rebuttal on this… I’ve never seen a Jeff Stryker film nor do I have the desire to. For some reason I don’t find him attractive, even with a big one, still doesn’t do it for me.

    He’s kind of looks ridiculous with that pompadour. Cant take the man seriously. Also, from what I’ve seen clips of, the infamous dirty talk he has-his “attitude,” is very grating. It doesn’t get me hot and bothered, it just get’s me bothered. I’d like to punch him cause he seems douchee, especially when he talks like an asshole like that.

    Despite Jeff’s claims of being hetero, married w/kids, I don’t think he is completely straight. He just reminds me of just another married DL guy. The kind that sees escorts frequently, who have wives and kids and the perfect life; but on the side get their real kicks with male escorts… paging Ted Haggard! Prostitution: That money isn’t for the sex, its for that person to go away afterwards.

    “Consumers wouldn’t bother writing such PASSIONATE negative crap about a performer they could care less about, there’s just way too much porn out there for them to like and get off to.” I disagree – I write passionately because I want something different from porn. This G4P business model is getting on my nerves! The porn industry needs to change with the times, the business models of the past 20 years are what’s killing them now. At this rate there not going to survive, since no one is buying their DVD’s, and they keep rehashing the same old cliche’s. It’s funny, Porn is probably what contributed to the Internet’s success, and now the internet is probably whats going to contribute to Porn’s demise. Why pay 50-70 bucks worth on one DVD when you can see ripped content and pay per view online. I’m kind of glad the industry is failing-the combination of other factors, along with Gay for pay, contributes to this viewpoint.

    Reply

  21. noname February 9th, 2009 at 7:10 PM

    Bisexual: Noun,(Def)- Someone who transitioning between gay and straight. Is gay, but hasn’t come to terms with identifying gay yet. lol!

    Reply

  22. Liza February 9th, 2009 at 8:46 PM

    So he’s boring. If you don’t like him don’t watch him. It never ceases to amaze me how many people cry on sites like this about how horrible so-and-so is. Why do you care so much? Why does it infuriate you? Why don’t you watch a guy that excites you and just keep your mouth shut?

    Reply

  23. Mike February 10th, 2009 at 6:56 AM

    Last i checked this was a FREE country and you can blog where ever you wish…this is a forum for comments..GOOD or BAD..so for the ones getting outta body including SHITTY ASS TITAN videos..get a fuckin grip..the dude is BORING as hell in the one film i saw him in..but todays gay porn is sooooooo awful… hell theses gay 4 pay dudes can’t even pretend they are happy to be in these movies..sometimes u can clearly see they are watchin a straight flick to get an errection…thank GOD i only pay $2.00 to rent them, they are worth no more..as for why people still buy them i will never know..in the past u’d get a few scenes out of a moive with HOT ass models..guess most are DEAD now, cause these studios are picking any and everybody… studios had better start listenting to there audience or there studios will fold one by one, its already evident by the sales they’re bringing in theses days!:-))

    Reply

  24. not me, oh noes February 10th, 2009 at 10:36 AM

    Keith, I’m here to ‘tear ya down and make ya stronger’ (oh Gods, I sound like Sarah Palin). Why do you believe these boys when they say they’ve never done bb? When they tell you they’re gay/bi/straight? It doesn’t make any difference because the guys who want to watch Titan will, and those that want bb will watch that. The strict lines of definition have become blurred and obscured — at least to consumers — and the only people who care anymore are content with you and ChiChi, et. al.

    But at least you admit that your features require heavy editing in order to be released. Kudos.

    I applaud you for sticking by your principles, as well. Its rare in gay porn, let alone life, that anyone actually does what they say. You do practice what you preach, right?

    Reply

  25. noname February 10th, 2009 at 1:18 PM

    “So he’s boring. If you don’t like him don’t watch him. It never ceases to amaze me how many people cry on sites like this about how horrible so-and-so is. Why do you care so much? Why does it infuriate you? Why don’t you watch a guy that excites you and just keep your mouth shut?”

    I’m vocal because I want to see better content that is geared toward me. So What if I bitch out an actor or genre… As the consumer, I have that right ask for what I want to see in a film.

    Reply

  26. Karma February 10th, 2009 at 3:15 PM

    What a bunch of prissy-assed whining queens. Ya don’t even know how to find what you like and enjoy it without finding the stuff you hate and moaning louder about that than you ever have during sex. Why do I have a feeling you still live with your mother and you’re perpetually unhappy about everything?

    Reply

  27. anon February 10th, 2009 at 3:36 PM

    Karma,

    prissy-assed whining queens? – You really are into stereotypes. I guess it makes sense because your defending cliches’ – keeping everything in boxes and in their place, right?

    UR not Leo, RU?

    Reply

  28. anon February 10th, 2009 at 5:05 PM

    “Karma” eh,… I mean “Laughing”… eh Leo?,

    Coming out as gay would make u “prissy-assed” right? For someone who make comments like that means they really have problems with gays. Even the “out” performers. I get the sense a lot of porn stars have negative attitudes towards the community, yet our money is good enough to take.

    Titan is lying about the filming, a short while ago, Leo was a virtual unknown bareback performer. Titan wouldn’t of hired him prior to his bareback shoots – they didn’t even know he existed until he worked on a couple of films later. Post production on films are long, but not that long. The only way they filmed him prior to those bareback shoots is if they discovered Leo.

    Reply

  29. niles February 10th, 2009 at 9:41 PM

    F*ck you Titan, who the hell cares what someone’s sexual orientation is or what kinds of movies they have made in the past. Leo will find lots of work in the industry in spite of your tacky rude comments and attitude. By the way, your films have become extremely boring and tired just like your attitude.

    Reply

  30. fake id. February 11th, 2009 at 3:50 AM

    It’s alright for you Karma, and guys like you, gay porn is 100% geared towards men with a straight guy fetish like you, for gay men who do not like straight guy gay sex, then finding something they like is very difficult, almost impossible since gay 4 pay is the absolute standard in gay porn.

    And btw, since it is the straight-acting crew who are the most objectionable against gay for pay, and you seem to really get off on it, I’m guessing you own a pair of pink hot pants, a feather boa, every Madonna record out there and are so camp if there was a competition to find the biggest camp-site in North America, you could enter and probably win.

    Reply

  31. Puff-n-Stuff February 11th, 2009 at 3:20 PM

    Uh-yeah and I gots a pair of size 14 go-go boots too. I have buck-teeth and I’m bug-eyed. This is seriously the dumbest comment of all time:

    “I’m guessing you own a pair of pink hot pants, a feather boa, every Madonna record out there and are so camp if there was a competition to find the biggest camp-site in North America, you could enter and probably win”

    Reply

  32. Jigae February 11th, 2009 at 3:31 PM

    Hey fake id: Leo has identified as (and been identified as) bi on several sites. Randy Blue said as much here.

    I hope that doesn’t kill your self-hating boner for him.

    Jesus. The obsession with gay4pay disgusts me. It has its place as a fetish, but it shouldn’t be (and isn’t) the only game in town.

    Reply

  33. Leo's Unused Condom February 11th, 2009 at 6:51 PM

    So what do y’all think of the latest economic stimulus package? “Stimulus.” “Package.” That just makes me *hot.* Rowr!

    Reply

  34. Jon Royce February 11th, 2009 at 8:43 PM

    When I worked with Leo back in June 2008, he had no product out. None. He had just finished shooting a straight scene, a solo, and a getting serviced scene with Jake Cruise’s site (I believe they were shot on the east coast, not in CA). I have no way of verifying what a guy has done in his private life before working with me. At that time (remember this is all before Randy and others) Leo had identified himself as “straight”. That’s why I put him in my series of videos “Straight as they Cum” (a play on words that pokes fun at the straight guys doing gay porn, not 80% bullshit). By the time he worked with Randy, Titan and Massive, he had already been fucked by Rusty on my site, so how could anyone in July 2008 claim Leo was straight and do it with a straight face (pun intended). Before Leo shot his first bottoming scene, he told me he had never been fucked. I told him he had to practice with a dildo before I’d put him in front of a camera with another guy. He did practice and to his credit he just accepted it and did not complain about having to do it (he did complain about the pain).

    I am always open to other producers getting references and photos from me when I work with a new guy. Part of the reason Leo chose to work with me last June was to get new recent pics that he could use to get more work in CA. (I’m in D.C., Leo was in Philly).

    Judging by the photos above Titan did a great job with Leo. He’s very easy to photograph but, like Keith said, not an a good actor. I’m sure in the months since I’ve worked with Leo he has gotten better (although I don’t know since I’ve not seen anyone else’s product).

    Leo is hot and I think he’ll have a relatively long career in porn (you know, maybe another 18 months). We’ll see. I am glad that he didn’t get stuck with one site and was able to work with Titan, Falcon, Massive and others (although I am not a supporter of the bareback scenes).

    Reply

  35. anon February 13th, 2009 at 6:02 AM

    “He had just finished shooting a straight scene, a solo, and a getting serviced scene with Jake Cruise’s site (I believe they were shot on the east coast, not in CA).”

    Kind of my earlier point, you did verify his claims – he’s worked with Jake; and if you know as much as I do Jake has bareback scenes.

    If your so against working with Straight and/or bareback actors then you would make a serious commitment and request that the actor comeback after a period of time when he works in condom only films. The whole straight orientation is a contradiction in what your earlier stance was – anti G4P.

    I’m not expecting porn to be PC, but sometimes it can get pretentious. Which is the majority of why I can’t stand it – first leo is a cop, then a fireman, then a smarty pants chem student. First he’s straight, then he’s bi – guess those actors who are “straight” or “Bi” will have less chance of carrying HIV. Maybe that is the reason for G4P, is for actors who are very active and have a lot of partners are more likely bug chasing – and want to get jobs and higher pay so be “straight” and get them.

    And you, who make claims of an stance against these things.

    Everybody is just trying to make a buck…so this actor was a hot, and you wanted a piece of the action – I get it and don’t fault you for it. I just feel people aren’t owning up to who they are.

    Maybe it’s the concept what a “fantasy” and/or appealing to the masses. But again, it’s porn so why bother – people are going to buy it regardless.

    Reply

  36. Anonymous February 13th, 2009 at 11:06 AM

    Gay porn has just got so stagnate, studios and sites are relying on the straight guy fixation to carry the porn, and it’s fucked it up. They are relying n models being straight and hot, and like Leo, Ty Colt and Tony Cappuccino or whatever his name is , they just lay there, eyes closed motionless, while they barely go through the motions. It’s not hot, or sexy or erotic, it’s BORING!!! I can’t be the only person getting pissed off and bored by it, and why spend $50 on boring stupid no good porn when you can get so much porn free and legal from the net.

    Reply

  37. anon February 13th, 2009 at 4:08 PM

    “They are relying n models being straight and hot, and like Leo, Ty Colt and Tony Cappucci or whatever his name is , they just lay there, eyes closed motionless, while they barely go through the motions.”

    Is boring the right reason to be against G4p?

    They very well could be gay – and just be a lousy fuck. I don’t think the response is as important as the fact they are sexually active with men – yet can’t own up to it.

    Like I said, I think these guys are stating they are straight only to make extra $$(I’ve heard “straight” actors get paid more and get more jobs). Just look at Leo, this guy was an escort and had bareback sex on several occasions and with multiple partners – reasons I cannot believe he is heterosexual. Which most people feel repeating sexual behavior indicates your preference. Also, He bottoms – what straight guy would bottom, OR EVEN FUCK A GUY? The only reason I think Leo would suggest this is that because it would bulk up his career and maintain the image that he is someone less likely to carry diseases – Which, like Leo, people in the escort profession statistically are more likely to catch the disease. (Since stats on heterosexuals catching HIV/Aids are lower)

    Plus, we know of stories of straight people experimenting, and were completely unsatisfied with the experience. Those people can live out the rest of their lives without having to repeat the experience to know that they are straight. These actors are very contrary to this “experimenting phase” being they are continuously fucking a lot of men for their profession.

    I also heard that an Porn star’s orientation can be used as a bargaining tactic: If/When those G4P actor bottom they will get a bigger payout since “it’s considered their first time and it’s not natural to them.”

    I feel It’s sad that actors will consider being publicly known as a porn star ( which essentially is a whore) better then being gay… it speaks to were our culture is at, how sad.

    Reply

  38. Ass Freak February 14th, 2009 at 12:21 AM

    I have to agree with cock addict that the boy giving head is FAR more attractive and hot than gay4paybore leo

    Reply

  39. VK February 14th, 2009 at 11:30 AM

    I think this Leo guy is about to burn out quick, he is too much of a flip flopper about his sexuality, his past credentials whatever, lol!!! Not only that, but he is overrated, overexposed big time. The studio is already looking for the next so-called “hot” straight guy/G4P according to their BS standards I guess. I mean, this is what it is all coming down to? You have to say that you’re straight to seem more appealing to some gay men, to get into gay porn now? LMAO!!! This shit is so ass backwards, if not just plain pathetic. What’s even more sad is that, the gay porn industry “overhype” these so-called straight guys up, as if their shit don’t stank, just to have the public at large tear them down!

    Reply

  40. Darren February 15th, 2009 at 8:47 AM

    Leo Giamani is actually bisexual but,boring as hell.

    Reply

  41. E-Z February 16th, 2009 at 2:52 PM

    I take “gay for pay” claims with a grain of salt, most of it being hype designed to simultaneously feed off of and feed into the gay man’s self-loathing and internalized homophobia.

    In the end, I find Leo Giamani smokin’ hot, and if you look at his performances objectively, he has improved a lot.

    He is vastly over-exposed however. Hardly a week goes by when there isn’t a new scene posted up somewhere with him in it. As hot as I find him to be, I lost interest a while ago. If he starts taking cum facials or swallowing I’ll become interested again. Until then, I really feel like I’ve seen it all with him already.

    Reply

  42. nachoarg February 22nd, 2009 at 7:21 PM

    he can’t have such a huge cock!
    i would fucking suck it all day long

    Reply

  43. Northam Post March 3rd, 2009 at 1:02 PM

    Am I the only one who thinks he looks like Jason Lee? And not in a good way either. He’s good looking, this porn star, but not anyone I’d go gaga for. Different strokes for different folks. Me, personally? Meh.

    Reply

  44. Boo-Hoo March 8th, 2009 at 4:40 AM

    Nanny nanny poo-poo another studio got him before you-oo.

    I’d say that most of the haters on here are the same studios that were BEGGING his agent(s) for him. You know who you are. pathetic.

    Reply

  45. Michael March 20th, 2009 at 5:45 PM

    I’ve read several times that Leo says he is bi and has said he’s dated guys.

    This scene may be boring (haven’t watched, but others commented) but I’ve seen him several where he is totally energetic and hot as hell. Especially the one for cocksure outdoors in the hay. He fucks hard and hot and he’s the better cocksucker of the pairing. I think he’s pretty amazing and he is way hot getting fucked as well. I love that he is versatile for such a macho guy.

    Reply

  46. mk March 24th, 2009 at 7:47 AM

    if leo’s bisexual then I’m bye-sexual

    Reply

  47. zoli October 29th, 2009 at 7:01 PM

    Leo, like Chris Rockway, has a great body and is handsome enough, but when he has sex he looks either not into it or like it’s painful for him. To me, not a turn on. And I found Jeff Stryker a real turn-off – stiff acting and nothing warm about him. So who cares if someone has a huge cock?

    Reply

  48. Mark January 13th, 2010 at 9:13 AM

    Its hot to watch just about any guy suck cock…I wish I had somebody to write and send me pics…i’d like to imajine myself sucking cock for hours…its nice.

    Reply

  49. Fag_4_Leo_Dick December 27th, 2010 at 5:22 AM

    As far as this bottom is concerned, Leo can just sit there and let me take care of his big georgeous cock and balls. He also has an incredible looking asshole that i could tongue for hours. The man is perfect as far as this faggot is concerned.

    Reply

Leave a Reply



ABOUT US | EMAIL US