Francesco D’Macho Lays Bare Gay-For-Pay Paradigm With Legs Akimbo

Posted January 22, 2010 6:41 AM by with 38 comments

Francesco-D'Macho-straight-fuck-pic-cum-condom.jpg


Hunky husbands Damian Crosse and Francesco D’Macho have always been a little more meta than other stars — it’s debatable, for example, how much of their Staghomme website is a business venture and how much it is just a record of their prodigious sex lives. So perhaps the amazing Mr. D’Macho is providing a much needed commentary on gay-for-pay with his latest installment of “Straight Man Fucks Me.”

In the teaser clip — could that haze represent our own cloudy vision on the issue — D’Macho invites over a straight man (“But how do we know he’s actually straight?” we cry, in a stunning reversal of the usual gay-for-pay hand-wringing) and the straight man comes over and fucks him. But, ah, what a rich text. The scene is played as reality, but it’s fiction. Regardless, the usual complaint about gay-for-pay — that we’re being taken advantage of by a generation of gay-hating money-hungry straight men — are revealed as straw men. After all, who’s being used here: the straight man who’s being paid, or the gay man who owns the means of production? Is Francesco self-hating, or is he taking what he wants from straight society? Most importantly, does any of that crap matter if Francesco is getting fucked and loving it?

I’ll tell you, it wouldn’t matter to me.

More …
Francesco Gets Fucked By A Straight Man 2 (clip at Staghomme.com)
Francesco Gets Fucked By A Straight Man (pics and clips @Staghomme.com)
Damien and Francesco in Porn Stars in Love (pics and clip @NakedSword.com)

Mike

Related:
Kristen Bjorn Fills Hole Left By Damien Crosse

Damien and Francesco’s Gay Wedding Video

Tags: , , , ,

38 responses to Francesco D’Macho Lays Bare Gay-For-Pay Paradigm With Legs Akimbo

  1. ... January 22nd, 2010 at 7:28 PM

    how is this hot? francesco is in it. the man has a butter face.

    Reply

  2. fu January 22nd, 2010 at 9:04 PM

    ‘After all, who’s being used here: the straight man who’s being paid, or the gay man who owns the means of production? Is Francesco self-hating, or is he taking what he wants from straight society? Most importantly, does any of that crap matter if Francesco is getting fucked and loving it?’

    That argument about g-4-pay makes no sense.

    It isn’t about what your thinking; or even Francisco’s excuse for the scene.

    The straight guy is the one with the power, and he thinks so. He is topping, and getting paid for it. There is no level of affection or attraction. Just lack of interest and getting bills paid.

    This isn’t titillating, just insulting.

    Reply

  3. fix January 22nd, 2010 at 9:29 PM

    I thought Damien and Francesco broke up?

    Reply

  4. Anonymous January 23rd, 2010 at 12:41 AM

    We get it Jack, you dig the whole gay for pay thing, you have a straight guy fetish. It is obvious where you stand, you have shown huge support for straight guys in gay porn, maybe even lauding and shrilling over the expense of an openly gay model. I mean the majority of the blog is made up of shrilling amateur straight sites and straight models.

    Why can’t you get that as much as you like gay for pay, there is an ever increasing amount of guys who are bored shitless of it, especially when straight model get all the attention praise and shrilling by blogs like yours and especially when more and more are traits of patronizing homophobia and most important fucking shit at having gay sex.

    Like it or not, there is a big gay4pay backlash, mixed with dwindling sales and perhaps the worst years for quality of gay porn, something’s gotta give.

    Oh and this scene was a big yawn. Maybe you standard of what makes good sex is quite low, what is your sex life like?

    Reply

  5. Paul January 23rd, 2010 at 8:15 AM

    1. They are broken up, you’d think someone who’s supposed to be an authority on gay porn would know that. 2. This anonymous, no-faces porn is tortuous to watch, and it’s not hot. 3. I’m not even going to dignify the argument with a rebuttal.

    Reply

  6. lol January 23rd, 2010 at 12:26 PM

    ‘power’ is an illusion.

    If performing in porn, or being an exhibitionist, is a way for someone to feel ‘powerful’ then that is pathetic.

    Your just a self-deluded whore.

    Reply

  7. lol January 23rd, 2010 at 12:29 PM

    what kind of power is this if overtime it disappears…attractiveness has an expiration date. Using sexual prowess to empower yourself is for the weak.

    Reply

  8. nelson January 23rd, 2010 at 2:59 PM

    These anti gayforpay crusaders always crack me up with their wailings about being victimized by porn. Here’s a thought – if you don’t like the particular actor or scene don’t watch it. To suggest that we institute in gay porn a policy of discrimination based on sexual orientation is ridiculous and hypocritical. Please don’t tell me what I should find attractive or what I can and cannot view based on your paranoia. Also, maybe the realm of gayporn is not the best area to carry out a moral crusade.

    Reply

  9. aguy January 23rd, 2010 at 7:56 PM

    I see it’s filmed in Moonlighting o’ vision.

    Reply

  10. Anonymous January 24th, 2010 at 9:44 AM

    “To suggest that we institute in gay porn a policy of discrimination based on sexual orientation is ridiculous and hypocritical”

    Jeez nelson don’t be a retard. It’s alright to discriminate out gay models over straight models though, and don’t say that straight models aren’t admired more, higher paid and preferred over gay models in gay porn because that is simply not true.

    Reply

  11. what January 24th, 2010 at 11:01 AM

    Who said anything about ‘victimization’?

    It isn’t about morals.

    Pride parades include many porn stars and production companies that promote g-4-p.

    What kind of social statement is that?

    This blog has even covered this phenomenon:

    ‘Johnny Castle to Headline Houston Parade’

    As if Johnny Castle and other g-4-p models give a shit, oh wait. I’m wrong, unless it only has to do with marketing and to earn the ‘pink dollar.’

    — That isn’t ‘pride’, its pathetic.

    Reply

  12. Jay January 24th, 2010 at 7:40 PM

    How exactly is someone who gets ‘rock hard’ by the idea of fucking a guy ‘straight’? Did we not use to call those guys BISEXUAL if they were also into girls?. Can somebody explain to me the difference between gfpay and bi?. This guy is a textbook case of a closeted bisexual guy, NOT gfpay.

    Reply

  13. Mario January 25th, 2010 at 4:17 AM

    typical of stag : gay4pay, piss, fisting, dirt, sm, NO kissing, hard in other words sick and boring IN SPITE of i admit several hot looking men. They’re a bad copy of RS

    Reply

  14. Cam January 26th, 2010 at 8:24 AM

    What I don’t understand is idolizing gay4payers who act like they are doing us a favor.

    Reply

  15. Derek January 26th, 2010 at 11:45 PM

    Porn is an illusion, so who cares who’s actually involved in creating it? If you’re gay and doing gay porn, great, but the people who do porn are bodies, sexual objects for our desire. Whether they are gay or gay for pay, who gives a shit? It’s not as if they want you or me.

    Reply

  16. what January 27th, 2010 at 4:32 PM

    @Derek at January 26, 2010 11:45 PM

    No, your logic is wrong.

    So are you saying, that if you watch something on television; for instance a newscast of the earthquake in Haiti, that it is an illusion?

    Just because it isn’t a live broadcast of a real time event… it is still a recording of an event.

    In this case two men having consensual sex.

    My point of G-4-p is that it dilutes the idea of having pride parades when g-4-p performers participate in them.

    It would be a fantasy — but the performers insist on being labeled ‘straight,’ as if being labeled ‘gay’ is something to be ashamed of, or bad. They ironically are more sensitive about this then the average male who knows he isn’t gay because simply he isn’t having gay sex and has a lack of same sex attraction–if you called this average straight male ‘gay’, their normal reaction would to let it roll off their back because they simply know that it isn’t a fact. Whereas, those g-4-p performer are the opposite; they emphasize their straightness to compensate for their profession of CHOICE.
    In cases when g-4-p performers are confronted with the idea of their ‘gayness’– those g-4-p performers almost never say: yes, I enjoy gay sex and I might be gay.

    If performers and porn producers were generally interested in a providing a fantasy, then they would leave the subject of sexuality off topic.

    OR… they would use GAY performers in a character role that is designated straight in this fantasy of fucking a straight guy– thus still providing this fantasy for viewers.

    I assume this[a cast comprised of just gay men] was the case in the past, and then some brilliant marketer came up with the idea of g-4-p: ‘Guess what, instead of some nelly gay playing a straight guy, we ACTUALLY have a straight guy!’ – I’m sure this created a lot of interest in the film. The industry took note and here we are today.

    But this marketing ploy is inherently anti-gay. Because it removes gay sensuality from gay sex–making it meaningless. And also suggests that gay guys can be ‘straight’ and to suppress there true sexuality. As if this message isn’t already permeating in the culture we gays currently live in– I’d like a break from this message, but can’t because even GAY porn seems to only glorify Straight men. As if a gay guy would be less desirable, or to be labeled as such is effeminate, weak, or less then the establish straight majority.

    look, if I was to show a straight porn flick of two women fucking,– for which each identify as straight, to a lesbian they would typically say that scene doesn’t depict lesbian sexuality. They might even take offense and feel that it is men using power to degrade someone into sexual acts that are not if their true nature. Why shouldn’t I apply this to men who are not gay.

    Reply

  17. Anonymous January 28th, 2010 at 9:41 AM

    Allicide, the point you’re trying to make is 100% irrelevant. It doesn’t matter whether you use viagra or not. If you get aroused by the idea of fucking a guy you are anything but straigh.

    Reply

  18. Damien and Francesco January 29th, 2010 at 4:20 AM

    Mario: There’s no fisting in our movies and there is PLENTY of kissing. Piss is very minimal, but yes we have some and as far as SM, not really…maybe one or two scenes i guess. Our site is very diverse and we do anything from romantic to darker stuff and even scenes with anonymous straight and bisexual men.

    Reply

  19. what January 29th, 2010 at 9:12 AM

    @ Damien and Francesco at January 29, 2010 4:20 AM

    You scene still really stinks. blah!

    Reply

  20. what January 29th, 2010 at 9:16 AM

    Are you two still together? Please break up already.

    I want a crack a Damien!!! ;D

    Reply

  21. Mario January 30th, 2010 at 9:14 AM

    Sorry guys , i would subscribe to your site BUT none of the trailers (except for the hot Hungarian thing with Francesco) have shown me PLENTY of kissing!!!!!! And i like it hard, and sleazy too but the real kiss is essential for me to enjoy gay porn but straight men plzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    Reply

  22. koral January 31st, 2010 at 6:06 AM

    plenty of kissing? Ahum in which scenes???

    Reply

  23. Damien and Francesco February 1st, 2010 at 2:14 AM

    Yes guys plenty of kissing, starting with the first stag homme video “senses” which the first 10 minutes are nothing but kissing and caressing. And about the divorce topic…no, were still married :)

    Reply

  24. what February 1st, 2010 at 3:02 PM

    @Damien and Francesco:

    Really you two should just call it quits! I give it a few years before the relationship will run its course.

    Also, Damien stay away from smoking pot — your voice is starting to become hoarse and scratchy.

    Like Whitney’s after having smoked too much crack!;D

    Reply

  25. Damien & Francesco February 2nd, 2010 at 1:39 AM

    VIEWED 343351 TIMES

    http://www.gaytube.com/media/50408/Real_Straight_For_Pay/

    I LOVE READING THE COMMENTS ON THIS PAGE
    THANK YOU FOR ALL YOUR SUPPORT AND HEY BY THE WAY OUR NEW DVD IS STILL NUMBER ONE MOST SOLD IN THE RAGING STALLION STORE….. WE CAN’T BE THAT BAD AFTER ALL
    KEEP JERKING BOYS AND KEEP HATING HIDING BEHIND YOUR COMPUTER SCREENS

    MUCH LOVE AND THE MORE YOU HATE THE MORE WE KNOW WE’RE DOING THE RIGHT THING.

    :)))))))

    D&F

    Reply

  26. Damien February 2nd, 2010 at 1:55 AM

    @what: Actually I have stopped smoking pot, i don’t do any natural drugs except cigarettes, that’s where the voice comes from baby. So the better comparison would be Marge Simpsons sistaahhhhs :p And why give our relationship a few years? why not just a few more days? Muakkk

    Reply

  27. What February 2nd, 2010 at 5:06 PM

    @Damien: I would LOVE to be your rebound guy! Let me know within a week. LOL

    Reply

  28. What February 2nd, 2010 at 8:05 PM

    @ Damien:

    Common’ got to give up the Marlboro’s too! lol

    Reply

  29. Mario February 3rd, 2010 at 1:38 AM

    I’m not hating just stating what i thought was to be derived from most of the trailers, but okay i give in and i will eventually subscribe and i certainly will get me the dvd first, hope it’s available in europe, and as long as ur men kiss (=tongue gymnastics i.e. the REAL kiss) well (and well filmed that is) i will become a fan, but again there was no hate only discontent but perhaps i was wrong and i’ll give it a shot as ur men are indeed hot-looking and i’m a sucker for the sleaze combi romantic latin thing.

    Reply

  30. what February 4th, 2010 at 3:58 PM

    @ Damien: I’m interested to know how an bachelors in Anthropology is applicable to your profession in porn? :D

    Should it be added to the list?:

    http://www.holytaco.com/2008/06/03/the-10-most-worthless-college-majors/

    Reply

  31. Damien February 8th, 2010 at 2:48 PM

    Lol yes anthropology is definitely at the top on the list of worthless careers, but bachelor degrees are also worthless :p

    Reply

  32. Anonymous February 9th, 2010 at 2:58 PM

    @Damien: Awww. I hope your wrong, I’m spending close to a hundred thou for a useless degree.
    I might have to start working in your profession to get out of debt…
    It would be a very short stint. ;D

    Reply

  33. KC Steel February 13th, 2010 at 6:46 PM

    I’d really dig seeing Damian and Francesco go raw for a scene. Bet they’d tear each other up.

    KC

    Reply

  34. Delvin February 14th, 2010 at 7:38 PM

    …makes me wanna Whack It!

    Reply

  35. What February 15th, 2010 at 4:57 PM

    No more Damien and Francesco scenes!

    Reply

  36. Anonymous February 21st, 2010 at 11:45 PM

    When gay men in porn have the effortless masculine bearing, superior rugged looks, natural virility, and the easygoing, unforced demeanors possessed by the str8 / gay for pay men you guys are busy complaining about, then the market will correct itself. Until then, alot of guys (like me) are gonna keep jackin’ to what’s hot: real men, str8, friendly alpha males – the kind of men I see in the real world – and not a bunch of gay poseurs trying to emulate that image.

    Reply

  37. Chris September 12th, 2010 at 6:07 AM

    All this gay for pay crap makes it hard for gay men to get their equal rights in America, such as overturning “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell,” since it plays into the bigots hands that all gay men what to do is to pounce on straight men. Sorry if I’m ruining your endless porn flick that’s your life but I live out in the real world where I have to deal with prejudice, and stuff like this doesn’t help one bit. I guess I’ve got too much self-esteem to enjoy this.

    Reply

  38. jckfmsincty November 10th, 2010 at 7:38 PM

    Francesco was just to masculine for the effeminate Damien. Frankie, call me.

    Reply

Leave a Reply



ABOUT US | EMAIL US