Gay Porn Sets: Blue Movie

Posted October 19, 2008 11:01 PM by with 10 comments

My favorite thing about 70s porn was the weird perversity of the sexual situations. Porn actor dialogue now tends either to be loud and proud or almost camp in its representation of the closet. Porn in the 70s rarely made any sense — and often, you’d get quasi-uncomfortable scenes with brothers or a power differential that resulted in someone getting it in the rear as punishment. Everyone acted like they were in on a really excellent secret.

Of course, I also liked the latch-hook pillows.

Mike

Tags: , ,

10 responses to Gay Porn Sets: Blue Movie

  1. 911 October 20th, 2008 at 6:53 AM

    Awesome to see Mustang continuing on with a diverse roster of directors. It looks like Cruz & Gobo have a winner on their hands.

    Reply

  2. ChicagoCub October 20th, 2008 at 9:10 AM

    It looks hot. There was something very manly and animalistic about 70’s porn.

    Hopefully they can repair mustang to good porn after all those poorly directed films with hot men in them.

    Reply

  3. Anonymous October 20th, 2008 at 9:16 AM

    It would have been great if they really shot of 16mm or super 8. I would love to buy some original super 8 50 foot reels of porno.

    Reply

  4. Chi Chi LaRue October 20th, 2008 at 10:16 AM

    Looks amazing!!!!!!

    Reply

  5. Bitsy-Bitch October 20th, 2008 at 10:41 PM

    If Chi Chi says amazing, I say amazing too! :) Can’t wait to see what Cruz & Gobo did with my all-time favorite – Nick Piston!

    Reply

  6. Riccardo October 22nd, 2008 at 12:33 AM

    well, i am a nay-sayer, cruz is right about the electricity stuff between performers but his selection of men is not my cup of taste. De gustibus

    Reply

  7. TJ October 22nd, 2008 at 10:32 AM

    What is so blue about it other than the obvious color of the blue lights? The guys in the old movies had much bigger hair and mustaches.

    Reply

  8. hairycheststud October 22nd, 2008 at 5:29 PM

    And fewer tats! Nothing screams “trendy fag” than a lisper with tats. And the worst are those calligraphy tats. Or anything circumnavigating the biceps. I would pay top dollar for a porn with hot, rugged, masuculine guys without tats! (Don’t get me started on piercings…)

    Reply

  9. Ga-Ga-Goo-Goo October 23rd, 2008 at 6:35 AM

    I want this, I want that, i hate this, I hate that…jesus, what a bunch of whining queens. And you wonder why we get stereotyped as having lisps and being limp wristed. Some of the biggest ‘men’ are the worst – there are even some directors who state they are straight who can out-whine any gay guy I’ve ever come into contact with. “Blue Movie” is an ‘homage’ – anyone understand that word?

    Reply

  10. Cranky October 24th, 2008 at 6:14 AM

    I think tats are hot. dont listen to these vanilla nerds

    Reply

Leave a Reply