Gay Porn Scandal: Roman Ragazzi Revealed!

Posted May 4, 2007 9:06 AM by with 41 comments

Roman Ragazzi, we hardly knew you!

We posted photos of him last month and though he seemed, well, too good to be true … and everyone seemed to agree. People have been going ga-ga over the stud and this morning the New York Post is reporting that the Raging Stallion Exclusive is also an Israeli consulate official working at the United Nations.

 

 

 

 

 

They may have also been responsible for him losing his job! It seems an intrepid reporter at the Post caught wind of Roman’s gay porn alter ego and contacted him directly via his Big Muscle profile. When they confirmed that he was actually Dror Barak and worked for the administrative offices of the Israeli consulate, they contacted the consulate and Roman quickly tendered his resignation. Can you say witch hunt? We just hope he doesn’t resign from porn.

Roman Ragazzi: The Complete Gay Porn Blog Archive
PREVIEW VIDEO: Roman Ragazzi (via NakedSword)

Jack

Tags: , ,

41 responses to Gay Porn Scandal: Roman Ragazzi Revealed!

  1. julio May 4th, 2007 at 11:16 AM

    en contar lo que quiero

    Reply

  2. qooq May 4th, 2007 at 11:51 AM

    “Witch hunt” my ass. If you’re dumb enough to be fucking on camera, be man enough to accept that you could be exposed to the wrong people. And if he was so proud of it, do you think he told the UN in his job interview? Guess again. Porn may be hot and all, but it has a stigma for a reason. All these guys do is get it up and screw on film, with the nerve to get paid for it. I’ll continue to get clips from blogs for free.

    Reply

  3. oh May 4th, 2007 at 11:59 AM

    porn is a better place for him… hot photos. wasted in the consulate!

    Reply

  4. Luvhim May 4th, 2007 at 1:01 PM

    OMG i love his balls and dick i would fuck him soo hard!
    First i suck his dick and then he sucks mine.

    Reply

  5. James May 4th, 2007 at 1:44 PM

    Oy Vey!

    Reply

  6. lane May 5th, 2007 at 11:44 PM

    It’s stigmatized because people in general either are afraid of sex and sexuality or have some moral issues with it, let alone films that show explicit sex. that’s also probably why homosexuality and other versions of “deviant” sexuality was and is somewhat stigmatized in mainstream media and life. it has something to do with people’s fear of sexuality or moral issues with it, let alone sexuality that is different from the “normal” version of sexuality. but that’s just my theory of it and i’m not some cultural or media studies expert so don’t take my word for it :] on the other hand it’s stigmatized because as you suggested, people like you are just jealous that porn models are getting paid to do something that’s seemingly “easy and fun to do”.

    i agree that porn models should know the risk when getting in front of the camera [after all with all the amounts of people out there who are sexually repressed, moralistic or just angry and plain jealous, it can be pretty tough world]. I guess my qualms about the first comment is the utter disrespect towards sex workers. you’ve written your opinion and so will I. after all it’s just job, what’s up with all the hate, anger and disrespect towards it? they’re just trying to make a living like the rest of us. [well not all porn models are doing it just for the money, but then again what’s wrong with doing it for fun? some people become vets because they like animals, and so on].

    “all these guys do is get it and screw on film, with the nerve to get paid for it” easier said then done. while it may not be brain surgery, it’s not that easy and breezy as most people would think. it takes a certain type of person to do it [mentally and personality wise i meant] and it’s something i would be able to do. I respect these models just as i respect everyone else. I also respect them [and everyone else in the adult industry] for providing entertainment for me that sometimes make my days a little happier ;]. not everyone in the world watches porn, and still disrespect the people within and behind it. you know qooq, if you really feel that way towards porn models, why don’t you just stop watching them, even if it’s for free? it’s funny that many people enjoy watching porn and yet have this opinion that porn [and the people involved with it] sucks and it’s immoral etc. it’s a funny paradox. i guess it adds to the sexual satisfaction of it. to enjoy looking at something or someone you find inferior. it’s kind of like how the [straight] male gaze of females functions.

    I’m not feeling bad for roman that his life is starting to have problems in it as a result of porn and i’m not saying we should feel bad for him since well it’s just a consequence he’s dealing with, just as I had to deal with the consequences of coming out to friends, family, etc [alienating certain people who had problems with it, losing respect from people who had the traditional breeder’s mindset etc.].

    whew, that was long..:]

    Reply

  7. kcholt68 May 6th, 2007 at 12:35 AM

    <<< Somebody has issues ...

    Reply

  8. toktok May 6th, 2007 at 6:45 AM

    qooq, you are disgusting. If you think people participating in porn movies are dumb then why do you keep watching it, you hypocritical shithead? You remind me of conservatives who think prostitutes are scum but keep calling the escort service. Fuck off, asshole.

    Reply

  9. toktok May 6th, 2007 at 6:51 AM

    qooq, you remind me of conservatives who think prostitutes are scum but keep calling the escort service. why do you call people dumb who work in porn when you obviously like to watch it? That’s hypocritical and I don’t like it.

    Reply

  10. raul May 6th, 2007 at 7:06 AM

    Witch hunt? No different than calling out an evangelical leader for his gay sex alter ego. Do not do the crime if you cannot do the time!

    Reply

  11. TFB May 6th, 2007 at 5:17 PM

    Boo-hoo, I say. He was a grown man in a fairly sensitive and responsible job. He should have known better than to pose nude before a camera. I hope the “glamorous’ life of a porn star is worth losing what was probably a well-paying job.

    Reply

  12. ricky May 6th, 2007 at 10:27 PM

    Bitter party of one. Now serving Bitter party of one. Bitter your lonely table is waiting.

    Reply

  13. Jack May 7th, 2007 at 2:07 AM

    Goog-

    You are right: Witch Hunt was not the best choice of words. I agree with you somewhat; If you do porn you should be aware of the consequences.

    I guess my point was that it seemed like the reporter for the NY Post was the person was responsible for having him loose his job. That’s fucked up if that’s the case: they’re supposed to report on the news, not create it.

    Reply

  14. 2twisted May 7th, 2007 at 3:47 AM

    qooq, what you wrote is just as reprehensive as what NY Post did. On one hand, you obviously DO watch gay porn and get off on it, but at the same time you belittle the performers in a disgusting manner. Seriously, what’s your problem? Do you envy Roman and others the fun the have on camera (which requires more acting than you possibly think, believe me, i speak from experience), or the balls they have to actually do it on camera without inhibitions? Shagging (particularly in gay porn) on camera requires plenty of courage (since Roman, in light of his position with the UN, wasn’t probably so much after money), something you obviously lack and cannot understand. Or is it because on top of everything Roman is big, muscly, and hot, and you’re just plain bitterly jealous?

    And anyway, how did all of that become NY Post’s business? Roman was just one of very many men doing gay porn, he wasn’t the biggest (in terms of exposure, i mean) star in the industry, nor the most outrageous, most spoken about, linked to any scandals and celebrities, etc etc. He was doing something that was perfectly legal, and did not in any way undermine his main line of employment, and he was doing it in his free time. As even NY Post acknowledged, he did NOT escort, so he kepy straight in line with the law, and was openly gay at work, which in politics is admirable. For some bizarre, unclear reason, NY Post set up a trap the poor guy fell into. What was NY Post’s problem? The odds of this little “discovery” happening by chance are rather slim, after all, Roman was not exactly very high-profile an official. Did someone tell someone who told someone who told someone at NY Post? Or perhaps some bitter queen at NY Post happened to know Roman and have some issue with him, and did this out of cold calculated bitternes/hate? Or does it by any chance have something to do with the fact that of all the consulates Roman happened to work for Isreali one, and the whole Jewish thing just exploded? (do you think it would have been equally big an issue had he worked for Belgian, Dutch, or British consulate…?) Anyway, the people at page six are responsible for deliberately ruining someone’s professional life and career, and depriving him of source of income. What they did was disgusting, and no doubt the karma will go back at them.

    Whoever in this forum writes “good on him” or “he should have thought about the consequences” etc etc is basically just adding on to what NY Post did, and since it’s inside the gay community, it’s even more disgusting. Roman lost his job for no justified reason at all: he did nothing wrong, he was as open as he could be in his position, and the only thing he shouldn’t have done was resign. I mean, why the hell did he have to resign? it’s not like he was Isreal’s ambassador to the UN. He was just one of administrative staff AND HE DID NOTHING WRONG!!!

    I hope if Roman happens to read that, he doesn’t get the impression that he’s being victimised both by bitter bitches at NY Post as well as the gay community. There are plenty of vocal haters around, by there are also people who are better than that

    And btw, if this is what New York is about, i think i’d rather stick to London, thank you

    Reply

  15. J² May 7th, 2007 at 10:51 AM

    In this day-and-age of “gotcha journalism,” it is hardly surprizing that somebody told the NY Post about Ragazzi/Barak’s extra-curricular activites, especially given his association with Raging Stallion, and equally surprizing that GPB characterizes this as a “witch hunt” given all the porn studio drama.

    Reply

  16. riddlemethis May 7th, 2007 at 12:43 PM

    2twisted,

    Yes, you should keep your illiterate ass in London. We don’t need yet more Euro-trash stinking up the streets here in NYC, thanks.

    I’d love to know exactly WHAT is so “hypocritical” about qooq’s position. He likes porn but doesn’t take the performers seriously – wow, imagine that! Please – it’s not as though he’s suggesting that porn performers should be rounded up and have numbers tattooed on them or something. No, he’s simply stating the very REAL truth that people who fuck on camera for a living generally aren’t scholars (not to say that can’t be but it’s usually not the case). Yes, America could be said to be afraid of its own genitalia and therefore makes a big to-do about anything involving sex to the point of distraction but let’s be honest here – the great minds of our time usually aren’t found on camera with a fist in their ass and a dick on their mouth.

    So PLEASE, all you ditzy little teen aged homos on here should stop equating this issue with how you feel about your parents. There’s NOTHING “hypocritical” here, it’s simply a rather silly idiosyncratic aspect of our current culture. For most of the history of Western civilization actors were reviled while theater was, at the same time, enjoyed by the general populace. Now, a childish outlook will immediately think -“That’s not fair – that’s hypocritical!” and some could argue a measure of hypocrisy in this dynamic. However, upon further reflexion one would realize that this more a matter of valuing one’s service staff and treating them with the utmost care and dignity but certainly NOT inviting them to dinner. Most little middle-class wrecks that troll around on here will never fathom this aspect of this issue.

    Grow up and stop approaching every issue based on how it makes YOU feel – try thinking first!

    Reply

  17. qooq May 7th, 2007 at 1:34 PM

    First of all, Lane, Ricky and Toktok can go fuck themselves. Ragazzi certainly never will. You’re so blinded by the Paris Hilton school of mediocrity, it’s pathetic. No reputable organization is going to maintain the employment of a glorified prostitute. If you’re so damn evolved, go do some amateur videos and show them to YOUR boss. Pass that test and we’ll see who the real hypocrites are. You want a world with absolutely no boundaries. Even this site is accessible to all ages, with explicit material visible before you notice the link to a disclaimer. Jealous, Lane? As I said, fuck you. I’m not earning money by contributing nothing to the world, with acts as universal as a bowel movement. I work out and look as good as these poseurs. I get off on their slutty antics, but some of you are ready to give them an Oscar. And I’m out of touch?

    Reply

  18. Lallika May 7th, 2007 at 3:17 PM

    Message for Roman, sorry to have been given the squeeze by sleaze chasers. wish the time would come soon that sex is an honourable pursuit.ANY sex! hope you will now continue to use your physical and mental talents (and strengths) to show men that sex is a joy to be exercised, not exorcised!
    Amen, Lallika.(90 years old!)
    PS. And I prefer any porn film over stories on murder, deceit, war, million-dollar-heists and other mayhem…

    Reply

  19. sexdog May 7th, 2007 at 3:49 PM

    i fucked around with dror a couple of years back when he was visiting nyc from israel (he was in the israeli army then) — we’d hooked via bigmuscle where he was using his real name at the time. i feel bad for the guy — evidently he was naive enough to believe that the gay porn world and the world of his legit career were somehow never gonna cross over (or that if they did, it wouldn’t matter?)

    and raul — there’s a HUGE difference between outting a gay evangelical leader and somebody who works in administration in the UN — the evangelical leader is actively working against gay issues, there’s real hypocrisy there that needs to be stopped.
    dror might have been working for an institution that doesn’t exactly forward the cause of gay rights, but that hardly makes him a hypocrite.

    Reply

  20. Anonymous May 7th, 2007 at 4:57 PM

    wow what an ass he watches it but has comtempt for the actors
    I have had a long passion to do porn, even know a bunch of friends in the biz and even some studio owners, but I work at a university and I know theres no way I could get away with it. A few years ago after I came out I had a big muscle profile for about a year, then this couple that became pissed off at me, (because I wasn’t into them) e-mailed my profile link to the University, it was pretty bad but I still kept my job and those were just a few naked pics.The really interesting thing I found out later was how many secretaries, co-workers, deans and faculty saw my pics. You see one of the Vice Presidents somehow captured the pics, she was so “disgusted” by my pics she kept copies and would show them around. I am happy to tell you though that I did receive rave reviews LOL I am a life long nudist and not at all shy so I really didn’t care. One of the first things I always want to know is do the families and friends of these porn actors guys, some blush and say OH NO LOL and I wonder if they realize how close they could be to some pissed off friend. I have several well known buds in porn that were outed by ex boyfriends and nasty co-workers. I agree if you are going to do it is a risk, but how can people be so hateful?

    Reply

  21. 2twisted May 7th, 2007 at 6:01 PM

    as a response to riddlemethis’ post, all i want to say i find it disgusting and somewhat pathetic, that while some piece of scum cynically stood the poor/naive perfomer up (and let’s be reminded here: a performer who DID NOTHING WRONG in any shape or form), the gay community we represent and partly speak on behalf of, adds up to trashing, well, one of our own. I’m not really bothered how differently to the rest of the world America sees its genitals, what DOES bother me is the fact that a perfectly innocent guy’s career has been wrecked here, and it would be just basic courtesy and decency of us to stand behind the poor manipulated performer, as well as condemn some cynical NY Post scum who spinned the story. But no, instead, a couple of us here add on to the trashing of one of our own. Well done, guys, the hypocrites and homophobes don’t even have to make an effort here, you’re doing all the work for them. Sadly, it just goes to show the whole gay liberation/rights thing has a long way to go.

    Reply

  22. riddlemethis May 8th, 2007 at 11:48 AM

    2twisted,

    I doubt you’re even gay. You sound like one of those conservatives who troll gay blogs to make US sound like morons.

    For the sake of argument, I’ll assume are you a homosexual (education amongst us does seem to be on the downswing). That said, take an English course, learn how to use a computer keyboard (the SHIFT key is a wonderful thing) and then get over yourself.

    Performing in porn is, for most, a choice and that choice has consequences. No one, as far as we know, forced Mr. Barak to take off his clothes and have sex on camera. It was his choice. Only someone who is dim (this probably applies to you) would think that doing a fuck film wouldn’t have a negative effect on one’s position in the private sector.

    Grow up, 2twisted, and stop acting like a teen-age girl “This is so not fair!”

    Sheesh

    Reply

  23. riddlemethis May 8th, 2007 at 12:10 PM

    Oh and by the way, there are more than enough cases of ACTUAL prejudice and homophobia that should raise our hackles. We don’t have to get all up in arms about some porn star who lost his job because people found out what he was doing on his time off. What proof do we have that this is a case of bigotry and simply not a one of prudishness or bad taste? None, as far as I’ve seen.

    Yes, as anyone who resides here in NYC can attest, the NY Post is a Right Wing rag published for truck drivers, doormen and janitors who live on Staten Island. If they’ve given this whole thing a homophobic spin that’s just their usual shtick (they’ve been running disparaging stories about former Gov. McGreevey for weeks now). People who don’t live here and haven’t been exposed to the lower middle-class bluster of the NY Post should do some research BEFORE making idiotic comments about NY in general. Of course, these are probably the people who, if they resided here, would be reading – the NY Post.

    The bottom line is that the gay community is under siege worldwide and in several IMPORTANT ways – this IS NOT one of them. Though I suppose it’s easier for some to display indignation over something as gossipy and inane as this rather than engaging in the complicated “boring” issues that face the gay community today.

    Twits like 2twisted probably discuss Paris Hilton with the same gravitas.

    Reply

  24. 2twisted May 8th, 2007 at 1:38 PM

    Well, i DO am gay, very much so (being accused of not being gay is probably gonna make a joke of the season both at my work and uni), but it’s not about me, neither about me arguing with anyone. What it’s about is a cynical destruction of one’s professional career and (we can presume to a quite serious extent) private life. And yet most of you guys are like “yeah, well, he should have thought there would be consequences” blah blah blah, not many of you here seem to have an issue with the rag for truck drivers and janitors doing it. Quite surprisingly, some of you even seem to approve of it in a way, adding, at the same time, how a)you like to get off on porn while belittling the performers and/or b)would love to do it yourselves, but it’s against your better judgement. Either case is pretty cowardly. I realise we don’t live in a perfect world, where people can freely pursue whatever they want to in their free time, but then again, i think you can only shame and embarass someone who feels ashamed and embarassed about what they do, and that’s probably where the difference is between us. Each to their own, i guess.

    Oh, and PS. I’m NOT conservative/republican/tory, etc (that’s daft, scary and hilarious in equal proportions)

    Reply

  25. riddlemethis May 8th, 2007 at 9:10 PM

    2twisted,

    You’re a twit. You don’t even present your, and I use the term loosely, thoughts intelligently and succinctly. You babble, you digress and you bore with your nonsensical whining diatribes.

    This is the last thing I have to say to you regarding this, or any other issue. If you can’t bother to learn to communicate properly using the English language then I can’t be bothered with you or anything you “think.”

    I hope, for all our sakes, you are indeed very young thus explaining this naivté of yours that verges on stupidity. If not and it turns out you are indicative of the average adult intellect in the gay community we’re in VERY BIG trouble.

    Reply

  26. enricko May 9th, 2007 at 4:52 AM

    Too bad he lost his job, but hey, he can still make nuff money in porn, coz he is so hawt :-DD

    Reply

  27. G May 9th, 2007 at 7:26 PM

    Riddlemethis,

    You seem like a person who likes to browbeat others with your intellect. Your obvious disdain for the non-wealthy and those with blue-collar and service careers is quite telling, and sure evidence of your own insecurity. You shouldn’t feel too bad about it, I suppose; It is a common problem among insecure people. However, your words betray the fact that deep down, you are all too aware of your own shortcomings. I suspect that you treat people in your daily life the same way that you treat people here, that is, you present yourself as arrogant, condescending, and full of superficial judgment. I understand that it is only out of your own fears about your personal inadequacies that makes you act this way, but I can tell you, no matter how much you attempt to beat others down, it will never make you feel good about yourself. You should think long and hard about the kind of person you’ve allowed yourself to become, and give some serious thought to how you might change it.

    Reply

  28. Marco May 9th, 2007 at 8:01 PM

    He should not have been fired- but he will make lots more money now as an escort. Anyone know where he advertises his escort services?

    Reply

  29. riddlemethis May 11th, 2007 at 7:48 AM

    G,

    You’ll pardon me if I don’t take a psychological profile from some nonentity on a GAY PORN BLOG seriously but…I don’t.

    I do find it interesting that you haven’t addressed the issue at hand. Don’t have anything substantive to contribute to it, heh? Probably not. I guess you’re more comfortable trying to discredit someone who obviously makes you feel inadequate. You haven’t even done that well. Your little screed amounts to – “You think you’re better than me, well you’re not!” That’s fairly typical of your ilk.

    Are you qooq by any chance? If you are then let me be the first to congratulate you on writing an entire post without any major grammatical errors.

    You might want to learn how to apply paragraph breaks but…baby steps.

    Oh well, whenever I see a doorman or a janitor with his nose in the Post I’ll think of you and smile derisively; sort of like how I’m smiling as I write this.

    Enjoy that drudgery!

    Reply

  30. can't we all get along May 11th, 2007 at 10:01 AM

    wow, this is so shocking ! so much arguing , so much bitching, bickering, bitterness,acrimony,rancor,animosity
    ,tension and drama to be found in this thread. why?
    All this because a trashy, super-ugly middle-eastern guy masquerading as and passing himself off as an Italian porn star, was exposed by a Manhattan tabloid as being a fraud.

    you people need to get a life, seriously.

    Reply

  31. Anonymous May 11th, 2007 at 1:04 PM

    Truth is truth even if it does come from an illiterate moron (that being this can’t we all get along person).

    Reply

  32. Lallika May 13th, 2007 at 10:46 PM

    Yes, I’d like to join.
    Now comes the silly bit: What social duties does the Porno Peanut Gallery perform?
    I am a genuine non-US national, so I need some info on this weighty question, because I do NOT know what a porno peanut gallery does…
    Thanks, and lots of smiles for you all, Lallika.

    Reply

  33. HotNath! May 15th, 2007 at 11:00 AM

    Im gay and I am proud of it! I want some boys to add me on IM, Im always up for fun!

    nathanfield@hotmail.co.uk

    Thanks Boys! x

    Reply

  34. riddlemethis May 15th, 2007 at 2:51 PM

    Jerry Falwell is DEAD!

    Let’s call an immediate cessation to hostilities in here in celebration of this wonderful occasion!

    Reply

  35. ExHack May 30th, 2007 at 10:08 PM

    I’m ever so glad I happened to visit this site, as I do from time to time, and check the comment thread for this story. I enjoy cutting arrogant a–holes down to their proper size.

    Riddlemethis: let’s NOT let you off the hook w/a convenient diversion when your position comes under fire as the elitist, hypocritical tripe it is.

    Your enjoyment of porn, while disdaining and degrading its performers as people “who have it coming” in the stigma and shame departments, is absolutely no different from the rich white guy enjoying the multi-million dollar house and grounds lovingly tended by illegal immigrants – while whining (usually after the 5th or 6th Dewars-and-soda) about “the horror, the horror!” of the brown hordes ruining Amurrika.

    In short, you’re a hypocritical pig.

    Are there consequences to performing in porn? Absolutely. Should those considering doing so, carefully evaluate the possible permanent changes that it will make to their lives? Absolutely. Do you, as an undoubtedly avid consumer of gay porn, have any right to perpetuate these moral judgements? In my view, absolutely NOT. You’re right there with the Rev. Ted Haggard, ex-Rep. Ed Schrock, Rep. David Dreier, and other infamous homo-haters and hate-enablers who rant against us by day, then go home to their lovers, tricks and hookers by night. Did I also mention you rather resemble the late great Roy Cohn in spirit, Riddleme?

    The logical basis of your argument (and that of others here) is this: those who engage in sexual practices that are consenting, victimless, but against society’s conventions, are less than human. Substitute “gay men” for “gay porn performers” and you’ve got the talking points of every religious fundamentalist whackjob, political opportunist, and the other trailer-trash carny barkers that oppress all of us.

    I’ll close by adding that I’m hardly a “ditzy little teen aged homo.” I’ve been an executive in successful, multi-million dollar businesses, as well as held a position of responsibility in the homeland-security community of the U.S. government. This issue may be a bit close to my heart because I’m currently writing a double novel with a major character who spends a lot of his energies dealing with the consequences of his past in the adult-entertainment industry. So much for that dismissal of yours.

    Have a nice day.

    Reply

  36. Shaneation July 11th, 2007 at 9:13 PM

    le sigh….

    Well, where do I start.

    I know.

    Ok, he should’ve known that he might’ve been found out at some point though I do see his reasoning as in my city (an undoubtedly elsewhere) couples at least can go make they’re own porn and sell it over sees with a very small chance of family/co-workers seeing it. Although, as we all know straight porn is more excepted (if we can call it that) and doesn’t seem to pop up as unexpectedly as gay/bi/odd porn but I can see that this probably didn’t cross his mind.
    Should he have reseigned? Hell no! He should’ve waited to see if they fired him then drag it into the lime light but he didn’t which shows that he was at least partially ashamed/embarassed by what he did so justifying in part some of the ‘hate/putdowns’ made on here.
    Do I think the Post should’ve gone and outed his ‘other’ career? No, it was none of their business, they’d already made their story though it was likely only a matter of time before word reached home.
    As for the ‘bashing’ that we see in this post, it’s not surprising really. It’s been like this as long as I or my friends have been involved in the community, the one constant no matter where you go. There just is more prejudice (or segragation) within our community than from without. Deal with it.
    To answer your question Riddlemethis,yes.
    Yes, college/university people in general (I’d say 60%) talk/think like that, not just the gay ones but all of then, everywhere. It can be maddening to carry on an argument but you get used to it.
    Something that might come up is if I’m a paris-whatever, Paris who? Joking, I remember the first time I saw her….I thought that she must be one of the ugliest women ever…but a lot of people in our community love her and find her beautiful..?WTF!?
    So no, not a paris-in-training, can’t stand her very much. (A Shakira maybe…)
    Anyway, have fun with that, but really, this post shouldn’t be this long and on top of that. There’s more discussion here (real discussion) than there was for our murdered comrades!?

    Reply

  37. Shaneation July 11th, 2007 at 9:22 PM

    LOL!
    I forgot, something else I wanted to point out.
    I can’t remember who brought this up but I’ll clarify. A lot of porn stars (male at least and presumeably some women) do have university/college/trade degrees for when they’re careers are over (around the 40-45yr mark usually) at which point they either continue those profesions at full speed or begin them b/c you’re youth is only good for so long :P
    I’ll list a few…let’s see
    1)Bo Garette is a Veterinary assistant (it seems odd even to me)
    2)Derek Cameron sells Real Estate (either in SoCal or Texas)
    Hmmm, there’s a lot of artists too (as everyone can get a Liberal/Social Degree…well almost everyone)
    3)Jack Black is a professional non erotic masseur (yes I’m serious and I hope I got the first name right)
    Oh heck, that’ll do. I’d have too look them up again and I’m too lazy for it. Ciao.

    Reply

  38. Posh gay August 15th, 2007 at 10:36 AM

    he was a good man ..

    Reply

  39. andrew35 November 11th, 2007 at 1:16 PM

    *sigh
    so much pain and anger.
    i asked them what they have done with their compassion. instead of human salvation, their compassion has created so much pain and suffering.
    they were silent.
    right and wrong are mere relatives. roman has done no wrong. page 6 has done no wrong. both are doing their jobs.
    there is greed and fear. jealousy and hate.
    where is the love gone?
    look inside yourself. who is doing the talking? is it greed? is it jealousy? who?
    if you tell me its you, your soul, then i will tell you your soul has no capacity to neither hate, nor love, nor greed, nor jealous, nor sad, nor happy. emotions do not exist. such is the peaceful state of nirvana.
    is the world ready? maybe. I sure am more than ready.
    so please stop arguing. what has passed, it past. the future is yet to come. for the present, live.

    Reply

  40. A.C. September 2nd, 2008 at 2:31 AM

    I love his body and his face, i never bareback but i would let him bareback me and feel him cuming inside me and let him suck his cum and french kiss me with it then i bareback him do do the same. would love to cum in his ass

    Reply

  41. docrocko December 12th, 2009 at 3:34 AM

    Who cares about love, religion and all the ‘American issues’ associated with porn? Just enjoy a beautiful body!

    Reply

Leave a Reply



ABOUT US | EMAIL US