Cody Cumming’s Cherry Popped With A Cherry Blow Pop

Posted January 12, 2010 12:13 AM by with 26 comments

One of the most notoriously unapologetic gay-for-pay’ers, Next Door Male’s douchey-but-so-hot Cody Cummings, lost his anal virginity … kiiiiiiiiiiiiiinda:


In a three way with a pushy brunette with a stupid name (Coco Velvett), a shaggy-haired rocker dude named Parker London bends Cody over and sticks a cherry Blow Pop up Cody’s hole. Maybe not even: I think it actually might be one of those tiny dum-dum pops. Either way, I’m pretty sure this is the first time Cody lets anything go up his ass on camera.


All snark aside, despite the “so-what”-ness Cody getting a lollipop stuck up his ass, the scene’s actually really hot. Parker’s sexy (despite probably being really into Ed Hardy), Cody’s asshole looks exceedingly delectable and there’s a lot of candy being used creatively throughout, including some of my favorites like Sour Patch Kids and Froot by the Foot. [ed. note: my judgment might be impaired due to giving up carbs for the new year.]

Images and a clip after the jump (be warned: there’s a smattering of lady parts throughout … )


Watch Cody’s cherry get “popped” on
Check out Cody on Next Door Male
Watch 27 Full-Length Next Door Male movies — and thousands more — now playing

Tags: , , , , ,

26 responses to Cody Cumming’s Cherry Popped With A Cherry Blow Pop

  1. Anonymous January 12th, 2010 at 3:26 AM

    I pity gay men who like Cody, they are sad and screwed up.


  2. Anonymous January 12th, 2010 at 5:58 AM

    Fuck Cody Cummings and his insulting travesty of pornography. There are far more attracting gay men who we can watch without some stupid bitch and chauvistic egotist ruining it.


  3. TJ January 12th, 2010 at 8:25 AM

    The guys on that site are cute and all but the scenes don’t do much for me. They are bland.


  4. niles January 12th, 2010 at 8:31 AM

    Very hot, keep it cumming, Cody.


  5. Allicide January 12th, 2010 at 9:25 AM

    I was told to watch this as “proof” of Cody’s taking baby steps into doing more with a guy. This scene was 3 weeks ago and it was bullshit. He was face down with the girl- who he says he will let fuck him with a strapon (someday, just keep that money coming) whispering in his ear while Parker rimmed him and stuck a sucker the size of a small acorn up his ass for 20 seconds. The “baby steps” argument is stupid at this point. Cody Cummings has been making porn for three years and he did more when he was Tyler than he does now. I say if the baby isn’t walking by 3 then it needs medical attention because it is functionally retarded and isn’t going to get better without help.

    I thought that it was Cody that was reluctant to do more and I still think he is an arrogant walking ego but after reading the comments on his blog I think it is his “fans” that are the REAL homophobes. These men/women are on there telling him not to do anything he doesn’t want to do – which is good- but then in the next sentence telling him they will lose respect for him if he does more with a guy or telling him he will lose his appeal. REALLY?! One can only assume the people realized they were watching “gay” porn so why is the guy that who actually peforms the gay sex not worth of your respect? I think that he needs to publically state that he couldn’t do what he does without those men and they deserve respect for doing what he will not. They also argue that he doesn’t need to support the gay community because his site isn’t gay but I beg to differ because you don’t see his site being pushed on straight porn blogs. Yet every week his site is published on QC and JUB even if the scene isn’t “gay”. It isn’t about what the guy is willing to do or not do at this point it is about the fact that he is so arrogant doesn’t even recognize that his site is built on Next Door pushing it and making guys work with him. Yet he complains that he can’t find girls to work with and gives them praise for being hot while not even mentioning the guys. How about saying thanks to the guys that are actually doing the job you are getting paid to do?

    Could you imagine a gay man putting out a site where he “allowed” a woman to blow him and once a month he “allowed” her to be in a room while he sucked another guy and fucked him? NEVER HAPPEN. Why? Because it wouldn’t have a company like Next Door pushing it.

    The Cody supporters always claim they aren’t self loathing and it is just a fantasy but that isn’t true obviously. They say the fantasy of “turning” a straight guy is a powerful one. Ok, if that is so then by the end of the video wouldn’t he at least want to KISS the guy who brought him pleasure. Yet, every video is the same Cody gets serviced, no interaction with the guy, and maybe the other guy gets to cum. The “bi” videos are even more insulting. These people are lying to themselves because they still feel that by being gay they are unworthy of getting pleasure back. I say to them – Don’t renew your subscription – use the money for therapy.


  6. aguy January 12th, 2010 at 10:13 AM

    She probably thinks she’s hot stuff, but if you can only get work in porn as the catalyst between a gay guy and a straight guy you might want to rethink your career.


  7. TJ January 12th, 2010 at 1:35 PM

    I’m a member of Cody’s site and a big fan of him and scenes like this….If you don’t like his stuff … so be it. Why do you have to be so judgemental? but understand he’s bisexual but mostly straight and that’s why me and his other fans like watching his videos.

    I hate to over-analyze it, seducing a straight man has always been one of my biggest fantasies. If Cody got fucked, it would kill the fantasy of him being straight. Part of what I like about him is the fact that he’s NOT gay.

    I have a lot of gay friends who only watch straight porn … and a lot of “gay” porn simply bores me. Does this make me homophobic? Does giving money to a straight porn company somehow make me anti-gay? Does giving them my gay dollar somehow undermine the gay community? That’s rubbish.


  8. Allicide January 12th, 2010 at 2:53 PM

    The answer to your question TJ is yes. If you are a gay man and the reason that you are attracted to the Cody Cummings persona is because Next Door studio has convinced you he is straight then you have ISSUES with your sexuality.

    It isn’t “seducing a straight guy” if the straight guy never comes around it is “degrading the gay guy” and that is undermining the gay community. If you don’t understand that is internalized homophobia then you are going to always feel inferior.

    Keep in mind I’m not saying Cody should get fucked. I’m saying if after 2 years he isn’t comfortable enought to “play the role” of a man that finds gay sex enjoyable then why should the gay porn blogs continue to support him. I don’t understand this idea that he will be less appealing if he kisses a man or touches man’s dick. Is heterosexuality that appealling to you?

    Actually, Cody Cummings isn’t a person – IT is a persona created by Next Door and marketed to insecure gay men. I’m quite sure that he would do more and probally has but it was edited out because of this “he will lose his appeal” crap.

    Again instead of renewing your subscription to the Next Door suite, I suggest you use the money on therapy so that you realize what I already know – You are 100 times better than Cody Cummings.


  9. TJ January 12th, 2010 at 4:57 PM

    Allcide, I can forgive you for being stupid, but I can’t forgive you for being retarded.

    I’m not going to respond to all the absolutely puerile and uninformed points your make, but I will say this: “Seducing a straight man” has been a major fantasy of mine for as long as I can remember… Next Door Male had nothing to do with it — they’re just catering to it. And clearly I’m not the only one as there are hundreds of sites catering to this. it’s so mainstraeam I don’t think it even qualifies as a fetish anymore. It’s a fantasy.

    Another popular fantasy among gay men is S/M and bondage. It’s not even a fantasy either: for some it’s an entire lifestyle, a lifestyle built upon subservience, respect, and……………..degrading one’s self.

    Are you going to go on a tyraide against them now?


  10. Drew January 12th, 2010 at 6:17 PM





  11. hehehe January 12th, 2010 at 7:52 PM

    Check out Cody’s butthole… i little bit used? I think this hasn’t been the first time something has been shoved up there.


  12. Allicide January 12th, 2010 at 8:05 PM

    Another site is now reporting that Cody will take his non-gay sex act to another porn site OnTheHunt. The video will be posted on both sites. He recently did a video for Bait Bus and they changed the entire format to accomodate him. Now another site will do it? If someone wants to go to his site that is one thing but to push him and his “straight is superior” agenda on other sites is just wrong. I ask that you guys go to OnTheHunt and use the link to tell the site mods that this isn’t a good idea. If he isn’t goint to do anything on they site how is it fair to the members?


  13. fi January 13th, 2010 at 3:48 AM

    TJ, I think the issue lots of people have (well I do anyway) is not that your straight guy fantasy isn’t valid, or shouldn’t be catered to, and think I Cody does that very well for you, maybe better than anyone else, if that is the type of thing you get off on, but as you wrote there are “hundreds of sites catering to this”. which seems unfair. I don’t get turned on by gay for pay, but 99% of gay porn models are claim to be straight. It’s everywhere, it is so hard to find a scene with two openly gay men now.

    I think unlike you and your group of friends most guys aren’t diehard straight guy fantasists, And most gay for pay guys who cross the line and have gay sex they are really bad at it and it lowers the heat in porn down to a zero zero. I’m really bored of gay porn because of all the straight guys in it and how bad are at it, that is not to say there shouldn’t be sites to cater to you, just not fucking all of them, that is why there is a drop in gay porn profit there is way too much amateur straight guy shit out there, and almost all of it is really boring, sexless and low quality. Most guys are just so bored of it.


  14. James January 13th, 2010 at 6:59 PM

    I know people don’t think that porn and politics should mix but in a time when we are fighting for gay rights on every front the one place that we shouldn’t be a minority and we should have control is porn. Instead of accepting this straight crap we should be supporting gay performers and telling gay for pay performers if you can’t get with the program then get out. The fact that so many think this straight guy fetish is harmless is a clear reflection that they do think of themselves as second class citizens.

    As for the BDSM fetish – uhm yeah it is usually the result of a maladjustment. If you really ask the men that are into it they will reveal psychic damage that makes them desire it. Sorry but no one has a genetic disposition for wanting to be chained to the wall and have weights attached to your testicles. I’m not saying that in other ways these men aren’t well adjusted but most of the time they aren’t.

    I will say that I think a “traditional” BDSM relationship – in porn or otherwise- offers BOTH partners far more than Cody Cummings ever offers any of his male partners. The Dom has a responsibility to give the Sub what they need and the Sub in turn fulfills the Dom’s need. Exactly what the hell has Cody Cummings ever done for any of his male partners?


  15. Leo's Unused Condoms January 14th, 2010 at 6:06 PM

    I luvs me some Dum-Dums. Yummy!


  16. Simon January 14th, 2010 at 9:36 PM

    I think ‘fi’ is the only one on here to actually make some valid points. ‘Fi’ notes that: “there are ‘hundreds of sites catering to this'(gay-for-pay fantasy format) which seems unfair. I don’t get turned on by gay for pay, but 99% of gay porn models are claim to be straight. It’s everywhere, it is so hard to find a scene with two openly gay men now.”

    It may not actually be an outrageous exaggeration to say (given the dynamics of porn) that there are hundreds of websites in cyberspace that cater in various respects to certain degrees the ‘straight man’ fantasy. It is a fantasy deep-seated with book length historical implications. I


  17. Simon January 14th, 2010 at 9:43 PM

    I think ‘fi’ is the only one on here to actually make some valid points. ‘Fi’ notes that: “there are ‘hundreds of sites catering to this'(gay-for-pay fantasy format) which seems unfair. I don’t get turned on by gay for pay, but 99% of gay porn models are claim to be straight. It’s everywhere, it is so hard to find a scene with two openly gay men now.”

    It may not actually be an outrageous exaggeration to say (given the dynamics of porn) that there are hundreds of websites in cyberspace that cater in various respects to certain degrees the ‘straight man’ fantasy. It is a fantasy deep-seated with book length historical implications. It is a contradiction within the Western sexual consciousness and will not disappear until the historical rupture that brought the heterosexual/homosexual dichotomy (and the afterthought of bisexuality) into being. Luckily Cody Cummings is but one minor force in a cultural movement toward the dissolution of sexual binaries and perhaps towards an ethics of pleasure. People people, please, be more Foucauldian!


  18. Anonymous January 15th, 2010 at 3:58 AM

    “Luckily Cody Cummings is but one minor force in a cultural movement toward the dissolution of sexual binaries and perhaps towards an ethics of pleasure.”

    But Cody is militantly straight, he doesn’t even acknowledge any form of bisexuality, and he has made it clear he does not enjoy or find pleasure in same sex encounters. He is in it for the money not sex.


  19. Mike January 16th, 2010 at 7:38 AM

    Cody Cummings = Super-yawn!


  20. Dan January 17th, 2010 at 7:34 AM

    I don’t like him and I don’t watch him. I like to watch guys who are clearly enjoying having gay sex.


  21. Derek January 17th, 2010 at 5:43 PM

    Yeah Cody supposed to appear on OnTheHunt. He will not do anything and it is an insult to members. Contact them and tell them it is a bad idea. Why would you pay to see gay porn and instead get the same boring scene they will feature on Cody’s site.,0,0,0,0


  22. Jake January 18th, 2010 at 8:54 PM

    I just wanna say I think Cody is hot and I would love to hook up with him but he needs to go ahead and bang a guy already or at least return the favor in some way! I would never pay for his site knowing the same ol vids hes doing.


  23. Acem February 5th, 2010 at 10:15 PM

    I think people need to stop being so flagrantly “offended” by Cody’s aloof intimacy with other men. It’s fine that he has limits that he isn’t willing to cross. He isn’t hurting anyone.


  24. harold February 10th, 2010 at 8:00 AM

    Gentlemen, Gentlemen !!

    Keep it simple, please !!

    Cody is merely an idol. A sex mannequin.

    His priority is his own pleasure and adulation.
    His male co-stars exist soley to worship and please him.

    Their pleasure is not his concern.

    That’s it, take it or leave it, but don’t complicate it ! Don’t expect him to reciprocate physically or emotionally. Plenty of others do. If you want that, then go to the other stars. But that ain’t his concern. Ain’t gonna happen.

    If you enjoy the fantasy of non-reciprocative worship, then you’ll enjoy his vids.

    If you insist that he acknowledge and please his male worshippers, it is YOU who are creating false expectations, and it is YOU who will create your own disappointment.

    There are large numbers of you who would HAPPILY substitute yourself for Parker, for the opportunity to do to Cody what Parker did to Cody in this video – with NO reply from Cody except his presence and willingness to let you play with him.

    Don’t deny it.

    That is exactly the cohort he is catering to. It doesn’t in any way reveal some deep repressed psycho-pathology because you are merely spending a few moments worshipping a vapid but sultry illusion, you are not having a relationship with him.

    If you belong to this cohort, you enjoy his vids. If you also get off on the tension created by the POSSIBILITY that he MAY at any moment reciprocate, more power to ya.

    But if you seek acknowledgement or reciprocity, then you’re confused about this product. Change channels to Bel Ami.

    I am grateful for the incredible smorgasbord of videos available today for every conceivable taste.

    Best to all, harold


  25. yellowboxerz23 May 4th, 2010 at 12:01 AM

    this guy sucks at fucking even girls


  26. Arcane January 30th, 2011 at 4:32 PM

    Regardless of the discursive violence or politics, etc. involved, Cody Cummings can’t even offer a convincing sexual performance. i’ve never seen him even maintain an erection in a video for more than a couple of minutes at most, and his cumshots are lackluster as well. He’s a bore to watch. Bad sex regardless of straight fantasy is still bad sex, and i can’t get off to it.


Leave a Reply