Scene (and Title) of the Season: “Sermon Not Semen” On Bound Gods
I was waiting for Christmas to be over before I posted about this sort-of amazing, completely blasphemous scene on Bound Gods with the owner of one of my favorite cocks (Doug Acre) and Chris Pratt doppelgänger, Hayden Richards (whose dick is nothing to sneeze at either): both playing priests, (complete with robes/collars).
It’s the amazing/absurd kind of thing we’ve grown to expect from Kink.com gay bondage porn masters: Richards catches Acre jerking off with a crucifix (?), so he tries various methods of “getting the devil” out of him. Sure why not.
More images and free hardcore clip after the jump if you dare …
Watch “Sermon Not Semen” on Bound Gods
From BoundGods.com:
In the house of the lord, Father Acre finishes his prayers. Before he greets the masses, Father Acre grabs his cross and begins touching himself. The horny priest blows his load onto his stomach as Father Richards walks in on him. In an angry fury, Father Richards takes the sinning father down to the catacombs below, binding Father Acre and beating him with the crop. The bound sinner endures hot wax all over his giant cock and torso before he’s shocked with the zapper and punished with a zipper of clothespins. Standing on electric pads, Father Acre feels the sting of Father Richards’ belt on his backside as he’s tormented with electricity. The young father has his legs suspended in the air with his big cock dangling beneath him as Father Richards relentlessly flogs him. Father Acre begs Father Richards to fuck the devil out of him!
Tags: Bound Gods, Doug Acre, Gay bondage porn, Hayden Richards, Priests
James Harding December 30th, 2013 at 10:51 PM
Um. Ok. Whatever floats your boat I guess!
James December 31st, 2013 at 8:45 AM
Has Acre’s ass ever received its proper treatment?
Jay December 31st, 2013 at 9:43 AM
Love me some Catholic porn!!!
tom December 31st, 2013 at 9:53 AM
Only fuels the fire from Christian groups. Can’t say I blame them. Respect is a two way street.
Michael December 31st, 2013 at 10:12 AM
The blonde is hot, but does anybody actually get off on this? I favor studios trying new things, but the ludicrous situation and bad acting make this more like a movie on cable television than porn. They seem to have included the interview at the end of the trailer where they’re chatting to prove that “No porn stars were injured during the making of this video.” The inherent lack of risk also makes it a poor choice for people who, for whatever reason, need to fantasize about being abused or being the abuser.
Jay December 31st, 2013 at 11:09 AM
Really?. I am outraged they massively raped children for decades and covered it up. I’m outraged they promote the marginalization of sexual minorities. I am outraged they opposed the use of life-saving condoms, even in AIDS-stricken Africa. And I’m pretty sure no Catholic gives a rat’s ass about my outrage. Yet you feel disrespected because two (very hot) consensual adults have sex with a bunch of ritual props.
Mike December 31st, 2013 at 1:25 PM
Doug Acre is hot! He’s cute and has a nice, big cock.
I got to see one of his Bound In Public shoots a while back. Even got to put my hands on that beautiful cock and balls…
Mmmm-MMM!!!
As far as the cathlick thing… Seems they are getting exactly the same respect they’ve been dishing out for thousands of years. I won’t lose any sleep over a priest-abusing-priest fantasy porn video…
Luke December 31st, 2013 at 1:56 PM
Love both performers but definitely don’t get off on crucifixes. Creepy IMHO
Aramis January 1st, 2014 at 12:46 AM
In order to make money, porn shows no respect for the human being. It is its nature: In porn the human being is always debased. Porn only displays people as vile, depraved and filth.
Faith is the highest passion of the mankind. As porn don’t know how to respect the human being, why expect porn to show respect for its religion? Go ‘mock’ jews and muslins to see what happens…
Jay January 1st, 2014 at 12:32 PM
@ Aramis. So I assume you just happened to find this thread in your favorite ‘faith’ forum?. Religion fanatics are the ones who show no respect for people, few institutions are directly responsible for the death of as many people as the Catholic Church. And no, faith is not the highest passion of mankind. And how funny you are outraged by the disrespect of your ‘religion’ and intermediately go and trash Jews and Muslims.
Juan Diego January 1st, 2014 at 12:38 PM
I don’t feel comfortable seeing blasphemous porn. I mean they could recreate the story of a seminarist/priest but why to use religious signs that can offend some people?
James January 1st, 2014 at 2:55 PM
Do you feel real guilty every time you beat off?
Aramis January 1st, 2014 at 3:10 PM
@Jay. LOL. 1) Porn is not my faith ( I’m not a saint, an angel or even a bigot )and I don’t need to be ok with all that porn displays as if I’m not I, was a reactionary. 2) Religious people aren’t all fanatics. But some gays are when they feel something clashes the way they live, the way they think. 3) Catholic Church has more than two thousands years of history…It’s wrong to condemn an institution that had to survive in conditions that aren’t the ones we have today.4) No one want to live a meaningless life in a meaningless world: Faith gives hope, points a direction, teaches, gives boundaries ( dignity )…Faith defines who you are. Does porn do it to you, to us? Porn/gay porn is a business that only exists to profit on all fruit cackes’ money it can catch. 5)I’m not trashing anyone. Jews and muslins are more vocal and active when defending themselves.
BTW: The ” Replay ” button isn’t working.
Aramis January 1st, 2014 at 3:15 PM
* ‘Reply button’
Julian January 1st, 2014 at 9:23 PM
This is fucking hot! Kink.com knows exactly some gays want. More please!
James January 2nd, 2014 at 8:45 AM
“Porn/gay porn is a business that only exists to profit on all fruit cackes’ money it can catch. 5)I’m not trashing anyone.”
This is what literary types call ironic.
Adrian Hamilton January 2nd, 2014 at 10:38 AM
I bet a few Priests can relate to this and why not…
Aramis January 2nd, 2014 at 10:18 PM
@ James: It isn’t ironic. It’s true. Don’t be afraid of the words.
Jay January 3rd, 2014 at 9:47 AM
The Catholic Church is a business that only exists to profit on all fruit cackes’ money it can catch, you got that right Aramis. The difference with porn is that porn only involves consenting adults whereas your revered cult massively rapes children; and that’s not a matter of opinion, it’s the truth. And even those who are not pedophile are far from celibate. This might come as a shock to you, but sex parties among Vatican staff(including both prelate and lay employee) are an extremely common occurrence; I went to several while living in Rome. For anyone in this day and age to believe Catholic priests lead celibate lives requires a colossal amount of ignorance, naivety, denial and hypocrisy. One catholic priest I hooked up with a few times several years ago would keep all of his gay porn collection and sex toys in a shelf right next to his catholic paraphernalia(crucifixes, Virgin Mary statuettes, etc.). I haven’t yet met the first catholic priest who hasn’t been sexually involved with other people, and they’re usually other men. Catholic porn is way closer to reality than most silly ‘coach/athlete’ or ‘cop/criminal’ fantasies out there. And that’s the truth; just because you’re blinded by gay selfloathing, hypocrisy(you haven’t explained yet what you’re doing here if you hate gay sex so much)and mythology, it’s not going to change.
James January 3rd, 2014 at 10:39 AM
Jesus. I don’t think you know what ironic means. No shocker there. You can’t call people “fruitcakes” then announce you’re not trashing anyone. As for being afraid of words, that makes no sense. But it’s all good. Please stew in your moral superiority a/k/a faith. It’s a pretty sight.
Aramis January 3rd, 2014 at 1:02 PM
@Jay: …And you want me to believe in your ” life experience “…Ok, I believe you…LOL. And if this filth is true it’s not my problem : It’s a priest’s problem. Don’t make generalizations.
@James: Sorry, I can and will always use the words that I want ( BTW: English is not my mother tongue and I’m even not living in a country that uses it. ) and yes, I think you are afraid of the word ” fruitcake “. As a gay man ( I supose ) you are afraid to be called that way and I think you made an issue about it not because you ‘really’ linked it with my item ” 5)… “but to distort the meaning of item “4)…” I don’t think I own you explanaitions but as you don’t understand the meaning of the words of your language I must affirm/explain ( again…) that porn, as a business only wants people to use them ( Fruitcakes or not it isn’t important).
James January 3rd, 2014 at 2:53 PM
“I can and will always use the words that I want…”
Good for you. However, you continue to yammer in nonsense and contradictions. Peace!