Gay Porn News: “Dirty” Sanchez Update

Posted March 14, 2007 9:23 PM by with 31 comments

matt_sanchez_gay_porn_1.jpgA few poor, confused readers commented on last week’s Rod Majors/Matt Sanchez story, suggesting it was hypocritical of us — and the gay community at large — to take him to task just for doing porn and being a Republican. One reader pointed out that he was merely standing up against being harassed which is something we gay people should understand.

Luckily, before I could respond, Matt Sanchez opened his mouth on Alan Colmes’ radio show yesterday and instead of stuffing it with a fat cock in it for once, he exposed what a jackass he is (and a poor liar, to boot).rod_majors_gay_porn_2.jpgYou can listen to the clip here, but in it Sanchez says the porn was from 15 years ago (and wasn’t just gay porn), and although he was an escort, he never “catered” to gay men, nor does he consider himself gay. Further, most of his clients “weren’t gay” and “tons” of them were women, even.

Colmes asks why there was an massage ad in a 2004 issue of the New York Blade with his current phone number and he just flounders. John Aravois of Americablog points out that according to IMDB his last movie was 1999.


Of course, you don’t need to be John Aravois or Alan Colmes to figure out this guy is a big self-hating, lying fag. We gays have a collective memory like an elephant’s … especially when it comes to our ex-tricks. Michael Lucas himself was kind enough to share his Matt Sanchez story with us:

I was first introduced to him when he emailed me and was trolling after me trying to hook up, telling me how big and luscious his cock was and when that didn’t work, how bubbly and juicy his ass was. I politely explained to him that I do not just hook up for fun as I am very busy, and he was welcome to pay me for my escort services even though he was an escort himself.

The first time I met him we were both hired to escort a client, an experience that was so uninteresting that I have forgotten almost all of it so I don’t have any juicy details to share. About 2 or 3 years ago, though, I ran into him at Bowery Bar where he was standing in the middle of the club chatting with some guy. I essentially found myself standing next to him, so naturally I said hello. He looked me up and down and in the nastiest, most arrogant tone replied, “Excuse me, don’t you see that we are talking?” I thought to tell him immediately that I knew they were talking and remind him that we had actually “worked” together, as he was obviously embarrassed for his friend to find out, but I just turned around and left instead.

And he gets around. Esteemed blogger Andy Towle reported on his blog:

… Matthew Sanchez and I met at a gay bar in San Jose, California and went on a few dates in 1989 when I was a graduate student at Stanford. I haven’t seen him since. It was brought to my attention after we had finished dating that he had gone on to do gay adult films but I had no idea he had joined the military and was also holding hands with folks who would be so loath to accept him into their ranks had they any clue to his background.

Now … any more confusion about what makes him a hypocrite?


Rod Majors in Built Tough
Rod Majors in Man to Men
Rod Majors on Towleroad
Rod Majors with Alan Colmes


31 responses to Gay Porn News: “Dirty” Sanchez Update

  1. Salami Joe March 14th, 2007 at 5:08 PM

    Interesting that he appears on Alan Colmes after the scandal. Where are his right-wing show appearances? I mean, they HAVE been supporting him with open arms? Right? Right?


  2. Warren March 14th, 2007 at 5:51 PM

    The 69 pic is so hot!!
    im gonna try that =D <3


  3. Willy March 14th, 2007 at 9:16 PM

    It would be really good if you guys could do a couple things.

    1. Re-interview Lucas and ask him when the last time he KNOWS Sanchez was turning tricks.

    2. Find a copy of the NY Blade ad from 2004 and publish it on your site. It might also help if you’d maybe publish another picture that shows his ad amidst the others. Make sure the date is in the picture too.


  4. strongarm March 15th, 2007 at 9:04 AM

    he looks like a good cock sucker. perhaps he should show bill o’ reilly a good time.


  5. Meyer March 15th, 2007 at 6:20 PM

    This just shows that you shouldn’t bite the dick that fucks you.


  6. Anonymous March 16th, 2007 at 8:51 AM

    Although I agree that he is acting very hypocritical, I do think that sometimes the way gay men go after each other with such ferocity does make us look like catty gossip hounds to the straight community.


  7. Travis March 16th, 2007 at 8:27 PM

    He always looks like he enjoying himself lol. LOL@strongarm


  8. Kelly March 17th, 2007 at 4:32 AM

    He’s a fucking loon, a prolific liar and a user of people.
    If claimed he was a democrat, the few conservative supporters would toss him under the bus in a heartbeat.
    In every interview he contradicts himself whilst wiggling in an attempt to keep his Marine status (so you and I can pay for his college).


  9. elmysterio March 17th, 2007 at 6:22 AM

    I made a comment on his blog since removed about where I met him, needless to say there was a hot tub a steamroom and a few other things. I never had sex with him. But we were in the same room and alot of people were having sex. It was a private male club in the bayarea for gaymen. No woman are allowed. There is just alot of hot man sex. and he was having alot of hot man sex. oh yeah and you pay to go there. so I guess that proves he went there for pleasure not work. but he did work it. oh yeah about the 11 inch cock not unless you measure it twice.


  10. Tom March 17th, 2007 at 1:07 PM

    I hired him as an escort in 1998. At first he was a bit “stand offish”, but then we got into some deep kissing (this guy has awesome lips), mutual oral, assplay and some hard fucking. I can’t imagine that he isn’t gay. He seemed like a nice guy. I wish him the best and hope that he finds his way. Tom


  11. literary bee March 17th, 2007 at 9:00 PM

    umm… i think it’s funny that no one has mentioned how fucking awful the fantasy adventure is – on his escort page.



    add ‘complete-fucking-idiot’ to ‘self-loathing-faggot’ and what are you left with?

    a dried up, stinky old butt licker named matthew sanchez.

    i can’t get hard for that…


  12. Anonymous March 18th, 2007 at 9:55 AM

    Love the news abut Corp Matthew Sanchez.

    Republicans are improving in their choice of persons who personify the Republican party. Now they are using born again hypocrites: I have watched Sanchez in gay porn for years. His background meshes well with conservative values.


  13. desslocktx March 19th, 2007 at 2:43 AM

    So the message here is that if you perform in porn movies today, but for whatever reasons describe yourself as straight, then be prepared to be pilloried in the future by the industry who itself has been profiting from your own film work.

    Alternate analysis – Many guys who come from Hispanic, Catholic cultures have sex with guys for whatever reason, but also get married to women, have kids, don’t consider themselves gay. Perhaps GayPornBlog’s Sanchez is a self hating queer analysis is in itself a racist essay by imposing Gay White Culture without regard to cultural sensitivities or views maintained by Hispanics.

    Perhaps we can only be as open minded as far as our personal comfort zone can stretch. -Steve


  14. Scott March 20th, 2007 at 6:02 AM

    Or, the much more likely possibility, that men and women from cultures/ethnicities that are heavily steeped in catholicism suffer from homophobia and repression, and that’s why they end up marrying opposite sex partners, even if they have same sex relations. The whole Catholic church spreading institutionalized homophobia seems a much more likely explanation. Ever listed to the Pope’s views on homosexuality?!


  15. Polly March 20th, 2007 at 9:15 AM

    Y’all don’t really know the true story so why bother speculating so much about something like this. BTW Democrats are just as hypocritical and corrupt as Republicans…why does everything have to relate to political parties? Geez-Loise!


  16. fedup March 21st, 2007 at 12:25 PM

    Polly wanna clue?

    EVERYTHING is political. You should WAKE UP to that fact and realize that there are people in positions of power who would like to see us (us being gay people) disappear.

    Try not to let your intellectual laziness lull you into a false sense of complacency!

    Right now, you sound like you would have been the gay guy/girl in Berlin of the mid 1930s saying, “Gaww, I just don’t see what the big deal is!”.


    PS: Any ditzy homo who is going to tell me to get off of my soapbox can bite it in advance.


  17. Seann March 21st, 2007 at 3:56 PM

    The whole story is laid out for you. But of course it all comes back to those nasty democrats, right Polly?


  18. Zachary March 22nd, 2007 at 8:56 AM

    desslocktx: It’s not that there’s any great “message” here; but likewise, to polly re: Democrats, it’s that Republicans say they are more moral, speak with a certain condescension in their voices, and act superior to the rest of us. When they’re caught in their own lies, it exposes them for the outright frauds that they are. (See: Haggard, Foley, et. al.)


  19. sickened March 26th, 2007 at 2:31 PM

    it makes me laugh that everyone here happens to know all there is to know about politics and the conservative “values.”

    let’s not let what a few (or even a majority) have said mar the image of a whole.

    what a bunch of fucking dense-ass morons.


  20. fedup March 26th, 2007 at 7:56 PM


    Where should I begin – hmm. I’ll start by saying that if you’re gay then your post is truly tragic.

    Let’s see – what’s next, well, before you call people “dense-ass morons” (did you pick that up from South Park?) you should really invest in an English course. Right now you don’t seem to know how to compose simple sentences. Is your SHIFT key broken? I hear that those second hand computers don’t hold up. My point being that when you impugn one’s intelligence using substandard English it just makes you look well. . .you get the idea.

    Then, I think I’d have comment on the idiotic, churlish content of your little tantrum. Did you offer to educate anyone here about the “conservative values” you feel are being misrepresented? No, you didn’t. I wonder why that is.

    Could it be that you’re just some torpid, middle American hick whose entire involvement in conservatism is by rote and you have no idea what the “values” really are? That’s probably more like it.

    Of course, there’s a tiny kernel of truth in what you say. The conservative agenda has gotten a cursory treatment on this thread. We forgot to mention how they (you) would like to deny a woman’s right to determine what goes on with her own body, how they (you) are too stupid to acknowledge the causes of global warming and instead put it in god’s (lower case “g” is on purpose) hands or how you support a war that you know nothing about and, due to your monumental obtuseness, think is some sort of retribution for 9/11. Stick another “Support Our Troops” sticker on the SUV, Pa!

    Maybe we didn’t take the time to catalog the evils of the conservative agenda because we – silly old homos that we are – are too obsessed with how they’re (you’re) trying to amend the US constitution to officially make us second class citizens.

    So, please, don’t come in here and lecture us about not knowing enough about your pathetic excuse for an ideology.

    Why don’t you, like the rest of the ill read, overfed, middle American flotsam, just wheel around Wal-Mart until you find that barrel of pickles for $3.99.

    Have fun with that.


  21. Polly March 28th, 2007 at 1:21 PM

    I am a gay republican…is that okay with you guys who hate all Republicans? y’all are the close-minded ones…think twice!


  22. riddlemethis March 28th, 2007 at 9:41 PM

    Wow, look at that. The same kind of backward reasoning that would make one a “gay Republican” would make that same boob try to disqualify anyone who has a problem with his absurd choice as “closed minded.”

    Why didn’t you just go all out and call us “negative” while you were at it?

    Is it because “negative” has a particular connotation in a gay context?

    No, that would require some thought and well . . .


  23. sickened March 28th, 2007 at 10:52 PM

    Okay, so you’d like to critique my English?

    FIrst of all, starting a sentence “my point being…” is improper (but then again, so is the redundance of “lets see,” “what’s next,” and “well,” in conjunction). Not only can you not start a sentence that way, you must include some sort of inclusive word like “with” when linking a previous clause to another. Secondly, lazy capitalization is not “substandard” English. It’s just laziness. I’m sorry. Finally, elipses (the “…”) should never have spaces between their successive periods but instead have one AFTER the elipsis. Still, your English is not the point.

    My conservative ideals that I seem to have left out (that I thought were understood but clearly are not):

    1. Limited central government (does everyone forget that one? You bitch about how Bush is taking over when Republicans don’t want him to either… and anyway, I don’t necessarily support the moron, and he certainly doesn’t embody conservatism)

    2. low taxes

    3. support for big business

    4. the right to worship and not have every religion knocked down by people who are “offended” by the words “under God” in the pledge of allegiance, but not to be Christian necessarily or condemn those who are not

    5. accessible education and healthcare for all without our tax payers footing the bill (i.e. no welfare support to those who “don’t need” it–which is a whole separate issue because believe me, I understand it’s needed.)

    Please do not condemn conservatism based upon the actions of one foolish hypocrite. I don’t think anything at all is wrong with homosexuality. I know some people do, but I also know that the God I love that loves me could care less about who you love.

    Also, I am sorry for my “dense-ass morons” comment. I’m just so sick of the name calling that goes on between parties (so I resorted to it).

    This isn’t my shot at the “can’t we all just get along?” mantra because that doesn’t work, but we can certainly co-exist. So forget the fact that losers like Anne Coulter and Bill O’Reily are trying to preserve the bullshit hatred toward us, but don’t forget that “conservative” doesn’t mean “Bible-thumping gay-basher.” I am neither close-minded nor ill-read, thank you.


  24. fedup March 29th, 2007 at 10:06 AM

    Dear Sickened,

    If you’re going to try to critique my usage you should definitely start by putting in the apostrophes, such as the one I used in “let’s see.” Are you familiar with the construction of a contraction? Is elision too difficult for you? Probably.

    Also, you should most definitely start the first word of each new sentence with a capital letter. Lazy capitalization certainly is substandard English, you twit. That’s usually impressed upon most in grade school. Are you yet another who fell through the cracks of some dismally ill equipped public school – “out thar to good, God fearin’ conservative country?”

    Your initial outburst and this latest screed make it twice now that you’ve displayed your monumental stupidity. Why not quit while you’re just thought of as misguided and a little slow? Are you a glutton for punishment? As a “gay” conservative I imagine you suffer from a lot of issues involving self mutilation and humiliation.

    Any homosexual who supports the current conservative ideology is tantamount to a Black Klansman or a Jewish Nazi. Your “lower taxes”, “less government involvement” crap isn’t going over so go peddle that quasi Libertarian bullshit elsewhere.

    Maybe you can score points and win some converts on an “ex-gay” blog somewhere.

    Have at it.


  25. coller April 3rd, 2007 at 4:14 PM

    OMG! Matt is so fuckin hot.


  26. Lucky Luke April 5th, 2007 at 11:42 AM

    I think the English syntax police have missed the point. It’s not that he’s gone straight or Republican, it’s that he is trying so hard to be something he’s not – and trying to dismiss his past – that makes this whole Sanchez episode so tragically ludicrous. Going ‘straight’ all of a sudden certainly deserves examination. I don’t think gay guys mind if someone leaves their camp: it’s the reek of bullshit on his way out that pisses us off.
    End of.


  27. Disgusted April 7th, 2007 at 12:45 PM

    Dear Fedup:
    You disgust me. Your moral outrage and (self-described) bitterness towards other queer people is deeply disturbing- hey, wait, did I just use a hyphen in that sentence? There’s nothing wrong with being on the left. Hell, I love leftist values. However, you seem to have forgotten that one of the core principles is respect for everybody.

    When you fall off your high horse, I’ll be waiting…


  28. fedup April 7th, 2007 at 10:35 PM


    I have NO respect for people (gay or not) who are SO stupid and/or politically disengaged that they let the gay community come under fire time and time again.

    So, bite me, you mealy-mouthed little sot.

    Why not ask me to show some tolerance and respect for Neo-Nazis or the Klan?

    Maybe things (and by “things” I mean minds) are slower in Dogpatch or South Beach but here in the real world we have a very influential, Right Wing religiously based political power that would like to amend the US constitution to further marginalize gay people.

    So please spare me your “Can’t we all just get along?” bullshit and wake up, you brain dead fool. It’s quite obvious we can’t.

    You sound like one of those moronic 20something homos who says “We’re, like, turned off by all the, like, negativity, so, like, we fight the oppression with, like, humor.”

    Give me a fucking break!


  29. fedup April 10th, 2007 at 4:03 PM

    What’s with these stupid ass queers who whine about “respect?” Do you “respect” people who think we should be wiped off of the planet? Do you “respect” those of us who want to belong so desperately that we ally ourselves with those people? Do you “respect” those of us who are so damn interested in pop culture bullshit that we don’t bother to worry about the conditions outlined above?

    What – you don’t? GOOD, that means you’re not entirely brain dead. If your answer was yes then I don’t really want to discuss or debate anything with you. Just get the hell out of the way of those who are fighting so YOU can jump up and down to synthesized disco music and NOT get bashed on your way home.


  30. me September 7th, 2008 at 4:51 AM

    one of them has a mullet, what a turnoff


  31. Erik May 13th, 2009 at 11:47 AM

    This is so surprising. A gay porn site turned into a political debate between a bunch of very ignorant dumb asses. By the way, I am a gay republican. However, I do not support conservative values. It is frustrating how people label each other based on political parties and whatnot. I, as a republican, believe in low taxing, little governmental control over my life, and to keep things private. That is all.


Leave a Reply