Gay Porn Breakthru: “Safe” Bareback?

Posted January 5, 2007 2:32 PM by with 72 comments

Raging Stallion Bareback
Bareback porn
has been a bone of contention in the gay porn industry for almost a decade. While major studios have long fought bareback upstarts for encouraging unsafe behavior and profiting from unsafe working conditions, the point may now be moot: Raging Stallion director Chris Ward claims to have produced the first safe-sex bareback film.

According to his blog, Ward has figured out a way to produce a safe sex scene that uses condoms while removing the visual signifiers…

“Over the past year I have undertaken a huge (and secret) research and development project aimed at filming safe sex so that the viewer cannot see the condoms. In short, the condoms are still on the dick but not in the viewer’s face. Just as Hollywood studios can remove street signs or unwanted images from their movies, Raging Stallion now has the capability of making condoms barely visible in most cases.”

Raging Stallion Mirage BarebackWhile some people will probably still decry the movies as a bad example for the general population, he doesn’t plan on denying the fact that condoms are there. Ward says he’ll offer proof on each disc that show the condoms in use.

I’ve never been a big believer in the danger of “media effects” (remember all the social curses that were to result from Beavis and Butthead’s cartoon activity or the supposed Marilyn Manson/Columbine connection?), but that doesn’t mean showing it onscreen is in the moral clear. In an era of little or no public education about HIV, is it right to encourage it? One thing is certain (at least to me): what people do their own bedroom may be their own business but what they do in the workplace concerns the State.

There’s sure to be a firestorm (as well as a lot of furtive masturbation). Is Chris a heretic? A traitor to the cause? A revolutionary? A Dr. Frankenstein? This may signal a new move for the industry — or perhaps he’s created the porn equivalent of non-fat ice cream (all the pleasure, none of the guilt)? Or is all this smoke and mirrors just another porn gimmick?

(The images above of Justin Christopher and Max Shutler are from Raging Stallion’s upcoming movie Mirage, the sequel to last year’s hit Arabesque)



72 responses to Gay Porn Breakthru: “Safe” Bareback?

  1. John January 7th, 2007 at 11:33 AM

    I don’t think barebacking is hot to watch at all. If your watching a hot guy get fucked, then that’s all that matters. Keep it safe for the models. Obviously, people are still buying gay porn with the use of condoms, so its not necessary. Besides, if special effects are used in the editing room to make barebacking appear, then we’re not really watching two guys going at it. We’re just watching a special effect. That, to me, is a major turn off.


  2. Baeowulf January 7th, 2007 at 12:42 PM

    I prefer the bareback movies—especially Treasure Island flicks—because the performers seem more into it. Mainstream porn usually bores the hell out of me. The actors never seem to be having much fun; they either stay in the same position for 20 minutes at a time or they switch through a group of some of the weirdest positions this side of the kama sutra that look more painful than hot; and, most important, they hardly make any noise!

    The bareback that I’ve seen—aside from all that cheap European stuff which is even more boring than US mainstream porn—is always exciting to me. And it helps that there are no condoms as I hate hate hate seeing condoms in porn. They just take away from it for me. Even hotter is when they don’t pull out when they cum!


  3. joe January 7th, 2007 at 1:40 PM

    eh. a large part of my pleasure in watching bareback porn is watching other people assume the risk i’m personally unwilling to take. the visual aesthetics of seeing or not seeing a condom are kind of irrelevant.


  4. HB January 7th, 2007 at 2:07 PM

    I actually think condoms in themselves are hot and I love watching guys put them on. When I see a guy putting it on, I know what’s coming next, and that’s a turnon for me..


  5. Jake January 7th, 2007 at 2:31 PM

    Geez, the condoms are just better fitting and the light is moved so the ridge doesnt appear so harsh. Not a hugu deal really. I was there.


  6. Anonymous January 7th, 2007 at 2:57 PM

    Hmmm. I’m ambivalent about this. I like watching bareback porn (it’s nostalgic and just hotter than regular stuff) but I’m really uncomfortable about the risks being taken. IF (and that’s a big IF) this guy can achieve this “special effect” then I suppose I’m all for it.

    If a disclaimer runs at the beginning of the film saying it’s a special effect then that’s really all that’s needed.

    Really, who the hell is going to watch a bareback video and say “Hey, they’re all doing it and they look fine. I think I’ll go be a bareback sling bitch tonight!”?

    Anyone THAT stupid should probably be taken cafe of by Natural Selection anyway!


  7. BJ Hooker January 7th, 2007 at 9:00 PM

    I’m not sure what Chris Ward is trying to accomplish here. Well, that’s not true, I DO know…he’s trying to get that barebacking buck and keep a clear conscience at the same time. But how successful can he be? When I saw SUPERMAN RETURNS, I knew that wasn’t Brandon Routh flying. And if I was a fan of barebacking, I’d know there was a condom on that dick. So no go. And if there are guys who might truly BELIEVE that there’s no condom on that dick, then aren’t you guilty of the same ethical questionability as if it was REAL barebacking?


  8. MONTREAL January 7th, 2007 at 9:04 PM

    the only safe sex films that are a total turn on to me are the ones by KRISTEN BJORN…those are hot..other than that, i prefer total bareback , unsafe sex films…….


  9. Aaron January 7th, 2007 at 9:05 PM

    enjoy bareback sex, enjoy dying.


  10. wow January 7th, 2007 at 10:47 PM

    His grammatical faux pas notwithstanding, Jack brings up an interesting point: Will “fake” barebacking pack (no pun intended) the same punch as the real stuff?

    I’ve also noticed a new trend of cum eating in films. I know that fellatio isn’t as risky as anal sex BUT doesn’t ingesting cum increase the risk factor considerably? I doubt that even the cleanest, most hygienically sound mouth is 100 percent impermeable. I’ve heard about antiseptic enzymes in saliva but I haven’t seen any real science backing that up.

    Sheesh – if it isn’t Global Warming it’s bareback sex (fake and real). Gilda Radner was right – “It’s always something. . .!”


  11. Dave January 8th, 2007 at 2:25 AM

    “enjoy bareback sex, enjoy dying.”….

    I think that if both me and my partner are clean there isnt anything wrong with it. If we have both been tested and a proven clean and dont have relations with others, I dont understand the problem.



  12. Equalnox January 8th, 2007 at 3:52 AM

    I prefer seeing the condom. In the age of AIDS, I don’t like seeing guys fuck raw, it shows a lack of respect for gay men and the health crisis we’re going through. Wrap it up boys. Prove that you respect yourselves and each other.


  13. Matt January 8th, 2007 at 7:11 AM

    This is wrong, and should not be done. Everyone needs to watch the documentary Silverlake and see how Kaposi’s Sarcoma can get into every part of the body, even swelling up the eyelids so that the eyeball looks embedded in the brain. The gay community once looked like a casting for a living dead movie, and we could easily go back to that. I do not believe gay porn directors know what viewers like. If you want to show something hot, show some of these elitist, porn models getting their faces saturated with glob after glob of cum. Stop showing the models nicely wiped off after every cum shot. Better still, for something edgy and horny, show guys blowing their loads in each others mouths, maybe they should spit if they do, but that’s hot. Tasting cum may not be entirely safe, but it’s a hell of a lot safer than barebacking. Don’t send us back to that. Nature has told us it was wrong from the beginning. In regard to hetero porn, they can do what they want for all I care. At least Sharon Mitchell is trying to ensure that they’re all tested.


  14. STARRFUCKER January 8th, 2007 at 9:28 AM

    If it looks like barebacking even if it isn’t- it still promotes barebacking. Those silly gays.


  15. IndustryInsider January 8th, 2007 at 10:20 AM

    It’s yet another sad and shameless attempt by Raging Stallion to try and make money. Faux bareback is the same as bareback in my book, it promotes and condones high-risk sex.


  16. Anonymous January 8th, 2007 at 10:58 AM


    “. . .elitist porn models. . .”???
    “Nature has shown us that it was wrong from the beginning.”???

    Anal sex is “wrong”?

    You sound like a crazy, self-loathing, quasi religious freak.

    I agree that safe sex is ALWAYS the way to go but your little screed wasn’t even coherent.


  17. Anonymous January 8th, 2007 at 1:49 PM

    I think that porn directors should worry more about booking “actors” who look like they’re really into fucking, sucking or whatever they’re doing rather than this barebacking issue. If the “actors” look bored or scared (as they often do) it’s a turnoff with or without condoms.

    Sean Cody and Kristen Bjorn seem to have figured that out. It’s so sad to see a guy get a load in his face and his expression makes it seem like it’s hydrochloric acid. Though, I don’t know if the cum eating that I’ve been seeing on Sean Cody lately is safe or sane but it certainly is sexy.

    The bottom line is that porn stars should NOT have to risk dying just so someone in the sticks can jack off.

    We can be sensual, sexy and even hot as hell WITHOUT being unsafe!


  18. chris January 8th, 2007 at 1:53 PM

    Hey Guys–The story as presented here is a bit misleading. What Raging Stallion is doing is presenting less shiny condoms that are not as visible as bright white ones. The condoms can still be seen, but you have to look closely on some shots. No one is going to mistake these for bareback movies. The condoms are still on the dicks but not in your face. For example, on each insertion and pull out you can see them clearly.

    Chris Ward
    Raging Stallion Studios


  19. Peter January 8th, 2007 at 3:18 PM

    What Gay Porn needs is more natural looking models who can ACT for the love of god and enjoy going at it! I COULDNT CARE LESS about the visibility of candoms …


  20. BJ Hooker January 8th, 2007 at 4:18 PM

    This is not the only press release I’ve read about Raging Stallion’s “invisible condoms”, and they all seem to clearly proclaim the “fake” barebacking aspect. Either the webmasters have all gotten the announcement wrong, RS’s PR guy got it wrong or Chris Ward is backtracking. Personally, if I know there’s a condom on that dick, it makes no difference if I can plainly see it or sort-of see it. In fact, if i can only kind-of see it, it’s liable to draw more attention to itself and be more of a visual irritant than if it were just “there.” I guess ultimately it doesn’t matter…with their “personal satisfaction” policy, if we don’t like it, we can return these movies for a full refund, right?


  21. Matt January 8th, 2007 at 6:23 PM

    Yes, nature has shown us that ass-fucking is wrong. We may love how it feels, but it is still something that is exit only. You know this is true responding asshole. If we’re going to shove things up there, we need to take care. In regard to my screed being incoherent, I have a lot of thoughts for a small space. Oh, and self-loathing? I’m in my 40’s and still negative because I have a sense of self-preservation.


  22. PornoJunkie January 8th, 2007 at 6:27 PM

    Raging Stallion is going to the dark side. Ward himself is nothing but an opportunist who sees a way to make a quick buck.

    An invisible condom, year right. I suppose you all believe in the tooth fairy too. These are simply bareback films that they can say have “invisible condoms.” How stupid do they think we are?

    Ward admits that he is selling bareback movies on his site, and now he’s going to start making them too. How reprehensible is that?


  23. chris January 8th, 2007 at 6:28 PM

    Hey Guys–

    Raging Stallion has issued no press release on this topic. The statement from the studio that started all of this is on my porn blog. Please read it and you will see that this is a lot of broo ha ha about not much.

    Chris Ward


  24. Anonymous January 9th, 2007 at 12:20 AM


    You’re a sophist moron. Learn how to write in English and then TRY to espouse your crazy pulpit logic.

    While being “40 and negative” is certainly admirable (though by no means rare these days, thank goodness) it is NOT a hallmark of the self imagined intelligence and prudence (or delusion) that seem to inform your diatribes.

    Get educated and get over yourself, twit.


  25. Tombo January 9th, 2007 at 8:15 AM

    I’ll admit it. I like watching bareback porn on occassion but it also fills me with dread about the poor people involved. i hate to disagree with you all but what is hot up here is the pictures. I don’t mind condoms but dont like to see it up in my face I dont want people dying so that I can get off.

    As for other people and encouraging it I think that people are there own people and that they will do whateever. Gays can watch a thousand public service announcements and still do meth its crazy.

    Barebacking is gross too when you get down to it. I dont like creampies etcetera. Kudos to chris.


  26. Matt January 9th, 2007 at 8:58 AM

    Hey Asshole,

    If my diatribes are so badly written and you’re of such high education, why are you dignifying me with a response? I seem to have really gotten a hold of you. You must be a fag who is rotting from the inside out; therefore, you have developed other justifications for barebacking. Maybe the word “wrong” isn’t the best word. However, with anal sex, it comes down to more than saying ‘shove that big dick in my asshole.’ There should be considerations before doing it. That sex act needs to be prefaced by cleanliness, lube, communication, and above all a condom. First of all, why don’t you leave your name, you cowardly fuckhead!? Second, what have you written here that gives a good perspective on this topic? Your writing screams of arrogance, so you’re the one who needs to get over yourself.


  27. IndustryInsider January 9th, 2007 at 9:21 AM

    Pornojunkie is right! Chris is an opportunist trying to make a buck anyway he can! Raging Stallion is already activley selling and distributing real bareback films. Now they are trying to make “fake bareback” films. The whole thing is just sad and pathtic! All just to try and make an extra buck or two. Disgusting!


  28. strongarm January 9th, 2007 at 9:48 AM

    da butt is dirty, and nobody wants their dick to smell for weeks. fuck with condoms, unless you’re in a committed relationship and are able to douche 10 times a day.


  29. chris January 9th, 2007 at 9:53 AM

    Going to the dark side? I think some of you need to take a deep breath and consider that Raging Stallion has found a way to keep making great safe sex movies. We do not film bareback sex.



  30. Anonymous January 9th, 2007 at 12:15 PM

    I find some scant solace in the fact that condom use is so thoroughly ensconced in the gay community’s psyche. The profusion of outrage (though much of it ill expressed) is indication of that.


  31. NekidSwordsman January 9th, 2007 at 2:35 PM

    Didn’t Raging Stallion shoot some scenes bareback in the past? I seem to recall something about this. Also, didn’t Michael Brandon do a movie for Treasure Island?

    So it’s not like this is really new for them is it.


  32. Anonymous January 9th, 2007 at 7:22 PM


    Your dick “smells for weeks” after butt fucking?

    Ever heard of a shower?!

    Don’t ruin OUR fun just because you’re nasty!


  33. Matt January 10th, 2007 at 2:43 AM

    In response to the nameless coward who kept attacking my posts, he is obviously one of us gay guys who is rotting from the inside out; therefore, he needs every justification in favor of bareback anal sex. For you, sir, it is too late to experience any “scant solace” about condom usage. You should have used one. Now, all you have left is your arrogant, pretentious writing style.


  34. du January 10th, 2007 at 8:51 AM

    Bareback sex is hot. When I see it I assume the actors are either both negative or both positive. It doesn’t encourage me to go and be sexually irresponsible. I fuck raw with frequently tested and trustworthy people I know well. I expect the porn industry to do the same.


  35. Ran January 10th, 2007 at 7:13 PM

    I dont think chris is doing anything wrong. The condoms are still there but there just not as obvious as they usually are.

    I find both condom sex and bareback sex hot. Would I go out and have bareback sex? no. Porn is about fantasy. The porn stars that do these movies know what they are getting themselves into and know the risk. Also I am sure they get tested as much as the condom wearing porn star.


  36. interrogator January 10th, 2007 at 9:18 PM

    Are the cumshots going to be invisible, too?


  37. interrogator January 10th, 2007 at 9:21 PM

    Are the cumshots going to be invisible, too?


  38. wow January 10th, 2007 at 10:50 PM

    I don’t get it.

    If they’re using condoms and are only selling a fantasy what’s the problem???

    Are guys upset because they don’t believe the porn company is actually using condoms???

    If it is a lie then that’s not cool but if they are using them then I’ll ask again –


  39. KaNeeQwah January 11th, 2007 at 2:51 AM

    I liek Bareback fils…espicially when they cum up someone’s ass :) I don’t do it, but I enjoy watching it. H*O*T!!!


  40. chris January 11th, 2007 at 10:06 AM

    I have an idea. If you dont like bareback movies, or “simulated” bareback movies, then don’t buy them or watch them. Good grief. This is a free country, and the man can do whatever the hell he wants. people know the risks. If they still want to bareback, then more power to them. It amazes me how some of the queens on here get into such an uproar.If you do not like chinese food, are you gonna go out and buy it? No. Get over it already, this is tired.


  41. Matt January 11th, 2007 at 11:32 PM

    Nameless Coward,

    I now have a very vivid image of a self-impressed queer with a raised eyebrow and turned up nose at his PC thinking ‘as I sit here sipping my appletini with an extra cherry, I’m experiencing a “scant solace”.’ You think your ostentatious writing is sooo scholarly, and look where you’re spreading it. I’ve never chimed in on a porno blog before and probably never will again. Obviously, you’re the one who needs to do some traveling (and I don’t mean the San Fernando Valley). Maybe, you can get your big ass to Cannes for the festival. You may have the opportunity to throw your underware at Daniel Craig. My hope is that people in your state have the chance to connect with their favorite celebrity before…

    F*ck! All of this pointless back and forth with some cheap porno blogger has made me late for Bible Talk at the church.

    Oh, and I’m not your f*cking “dear”.


  42. spiffy January 12th, 2007 at 4:20 AM

    If I enjoy watching bareback porn, but knowing that Raging Stallion fakes it, then what’s the point? It’s still technically not bareback porn. How are they going to market it? “…Now featuring genuine simulated bareback action”?

    Having said that, I agree with some of the earlier comments, that studios such as RS should invest more in models / actors who can at least act like they are enjoying the sex. The last few RS vidoes I’ve seen have been boring — as hot as the men are, if they don’t look like they’re into it, then I can’t get into it either.


  43. Anonymous January 12th, 2007 at 12:51 PM

    Ahh, another badly phrased rant from Matt.

    I think I actually feel sorry for him at this point.

    It must be terrible to be a middle-aged, marginally educated, angry, provincial, sexually frustrated, self loathing homosexual. So much so that he comes onto a PORN blog and says that “Anal sex is wrong!”.

    Poor dear.


  44. Tommy January 13th, 2007 at 7:38 AM

    Personally, I get off watching Str8 porn. Because most gay porn is VERY boring. And now that the hetero guys are going to the gym now, they look amazing.

    It funny how they rarely use condoms int Str8 porn and no one there seems to be making a fuss about those heteros fucking bare and fucking bare all the time.

    Also, most of those gay porn stars we admire so much do not use condoms off the set. Believe me, I know.


  45. CD January 13th, 2007 at 9:46 PM

    Personally I prefer porn with condoms, my own aversion to unprotected sex causes all sorts of unpleasant thoughts to fill my head during bareback porn. But for consenting adult models and consenting adult audiences it’s their prerogative.

    But a lot of people have made a good point. We don’t so much care about the condoms or lack of, we’d much rather they make the sex better. A lot of people notice that “amateur” and bareback porn are more exciting than the completely wooden performances from the pro studios.

    But I don’t blame the models, I blame the directors. They’re so busy micromanaging tevery movement and stop-starting for angles and editing, how could anyone enjoy themself? Just shut up and let the guys fuck, that’s what you’re paying them for. Let it be the crew’s job to worry about getting the angles and where the light is and just let the models focus on fucking!! How is that difficult?


  46. wow January 14th, 2007 at 9:50 PM


    Well said!


  47. Quentin Ergane January 15th, 2007 at 11:43 AM

    I have to agree… Matt, you come off as uneducated and raving more than anything.

    The world is not black and white. Personally, I hate that we talk about our sex as being “bareback” at all. It’s just sex. Also, in bareback companies, they usually have a stable of guys who are in all the vids and having sex with each other… except for the Euro ones where the guys appear to be straight (for all the bad sucking and fucking) and it looks awful.

    Let’s get around this whole moral posturing when and where it comes to having sex with or without condoms. It’s tired. It’s divisive. It sets up this hierarchy of superiority within our community instead of bringing us all together.

    When I watch “bareback” porn, what I get off on is the intensity of the sex from BOTH partners. They don’t appear tired or bored or scared to make noise least they sound “girly” — I like to hear people’s inner animals!

    You can use sheer condoms if you want, but if they quality of sex is the same, what does it matter?

    Also, I like bareback porn because those guys have sex with each other unabashedly and that is something you don’t get or don’t *always* get with condomed porn. I like condom porn, too, because I think it is sexy when people care about each other, but when two consenting adults choose to have sex sans condoms, it is not the choice I would make for myself, but it is their choice. I would rather people talk about that instead of it being regulated to the closet…

    But I think I am crossing arguments, too… because there’s just SO MUCH in this one issue.


  48. Matt January 15th, 2007 at 9:36 PM

    Hi Quentin Ergane,

    You seem much nicer than that nameless coward who has been attacking my posts. At least you have some modesty about yourself. Nameless Coward was calling me uneducated for many of his reasons, but he mainly believes my posts are very, very badly written. Have you closely read his? The one where he writes “scant solace” is my favorite. I find it positively laughable. This guy is so pumped up about himself that I don’t believe anyone would put up with that for twelve years. In fact, I think I’ll refer to him as Pompous C*nt from now on.

    In regard to the blog topic here, I mainly just streamlined a bunch of thougts together on my first post. However, I believe condoms should be seen in gay porn. I think barebacking sends a bad message. I don’t believe anal sex is wrong, but I do believe us gays should take care when doing it. If I’m going to do it, I require good communication, cleanliness, lots of lube, and above all a condom. Keep in mind. There is more to catch than just HIV. There is also Hepatitis. When I was younger, I had venereal warts so far in my asshole I required surgery. I’m not a creationist, but I believe an asshole has a primary purpose, and it’s not fucking. We may love how it feels, but we have to be considerate. I love taking it in the asshole if I’m getting it from someone with whom I can communicate. In the long run, I don’t care if gays have bareback sex. It’s just not for me. I’m very live and let live unless you’re a pompous c*nt. What’s more, Quentin, I did write that I like to see porn models cumming in each others mouths, so I’m not that big of a prude.

    Quentin, I know you think I’m uneducated, but I think your writing is God awful. You may want to watch your sentence structuring. There’s a pompous c*nt around here with a red pen.

    Hey Pompous C*nt, Here’s another rant. Hop to it boy!


  49. Eddie January 16th, 2007 at 8:04 AM

    I like it this way.. i want to be on top..


  50. Anonymous January 16th, 2007 at 12:44 PM


    Poor Matt is at it again!

    It must be SO awful to be him. He’s obviously incredibly angry yet seems to lack the basic language skills to express it with any sort of intelligence or wit.

    Look, he’s still on the “coward” tack. Matt, weren’t you able to understand what I wrote to you about this being the internet thus making us ALL “cowards” in the way that you’re asserting? Oh right, that’s probably too difficult a concept for you – never mind. If calling me a “coward” allows you to salvage some scrap of self-respect from this whole affair then by all means. . .

    I wonder if he appreciates the irony of his dissertation on “assholes.” It’s not likely.

    Oh well, a clearer picture has emerged from Matt’s latest screed. We now see he’s a sexual ex-smoker. He was a whore in his “younger days” and according to him he paid the consequences. Now he wants everyone else to suffer for his mistakes.

    Yes boys, we have a gay Aunt Esther on our hands. . .

    “Put down that liquor and praise Jesus, Fred Sanford you fish-eyed fool!”

    PS: He still hasn’t apologized for his description of people suffering with HIV/AIDS.

    I invite everyone to hold their nose and scroll back to read that.


  51. Anonymous January 17th, 2007 at 2:33 AM

    Matty dear,

    I’m sure others will second when I say that this “exchange” has become entirely tiresome and simply must end so here it goes. . .

    I’m truly happy that you’re over your slutty days and all the creepy-crawlies you picked up during.

    However, your experiences have apparently caused you to hate homosexual sex, yourself for desiring it and others for engaging in it without sharing your paralyzing neurosis and that’s something that should be worked on with the help of a professional therapist.

    If your posts have shown us anything it’s that you obviously suffer from numerous educational and psychological shortcomings (among them a pronounced inferiority complex) but you won’t get better by thrashing around on a blog and embarrassing yourself with one nonsensical diatribe after another.

    Perhaps you should translate some of the monumental discipline at the core of that self-proclaimed “sexual responsibility” of yours into some corrective wherewithal and get help immediately instead of coming here and making insensitive comments about those in our community unfortunate enough to have been stricken with HIV/AIDS. Though you are uncouth and seemingly mentally unbalanced there really is no excuse for that kind of behavior.

    Despite all that, believe me when I write that I truly hope you’re able to overcome this pitiful catalog of hindrances and the anger, prejudice and pain they continue to cause you and the suffering people your hateful speech has injured.

    Good bye and good luck!


  52. Sam January 18th, 2007 at 9:01 AM

    I saw this topic posted here and just had to chime in. First of all i would like to put my full support behind Chris Ward- screw what these people have to say, as alot of them will be the first to go out and buy these new style of videos (though they probably will never admit it).
    Its brilliant that you have found away to keep your models safe while still fulfilling the fantasy of certain consumers. I’m totally for artistic expression and i dont think porn should be an after school special or public service announcement- every responsible person now that they should be practicing safe sex, i dont need PORN to tell me that, and when i see some directors and actors getting all self-righteous i get upset as i feel they are being condescending and patronizing, and i dont need lessons on morality from porn stars. Besides some of the practices in mainstream porn (example rimming and raw oral sex) aren’t totally safe but everyone still watches that with no complaints. I have a few complaints about mainstream porn most of which centered around it being too tailored, banal, over directed and self indulgent- however i have to commend you as i see where you’ve tried to avoid this. I will admit that i do watch bareback porn, but my primary reason for that is that its a whole lot more real, unhinged, unscripted and the guys seem to actually be enjoying the sex, rather than trying to profile themselves- its for these same reason why i tend to like the amateur stuff too.
    Its time for people to stop being so chastizing and judgemental and let people be, how can you complain about the religious right being arrogant, self-righteous and hypercritical (sp)when some of you are doing the same thing towards your other gay brothers (yes i said brothers). You wont get someone to adopt safer sex practices by calling them nasty, murderers and all that derogatory stuff. Besides there are alot of other unsafe practices in the gay community right now (such as substance abuse) that many gay men seem to look over.

    So Chris i’m just here to say not to let anyone discourage you, you came up with a great product and anyone who wishes to buy it will buy it and those who dont like it wont- its the beauty of the free market.
    P.S. Some of you say thats its never okay to barebak in any circumstances, while your point is valid, how do you think you came into this world.


  53. Matt January 18th, 2007 at 9:49 AM

    Pompous C*nt,

    I thought of this previously, and now I’m sure. You’re employed here or one of the creators of this web site? Are you Jack, or are you Mike or some Gay Porn Blog peon? Is this how you get things riled up around here? There is a lot of bad writing on this blog or “ill expression” as you put it. Why do you pounce on mine? Maybe you don’t like the way I expressed it, but bottomline, I think condoms should continue to be used and seen in gay porno. What is so fucking terrible about me expressing that? In regard to the other stuff, I’m not going to apologise for anything, so you can go fuck youself. I would like it to be good bye and good luck, but now that I know where you work, I’m sure you’ll be getting the last word.


  54. Samuel January 18th, 2007 at 5:01 PM

    Wrote a comment before, but it seems GPG has censored it, it wont be the first time they did something like this. I was trying to show my support for Chris on what he’s doing- i think it is ingenious- he manages to fulfill the fantasy of some consumers and keep his models safe at the same time.

    Personally, i believe their is alot of hyperbole surrounding the whole issue of bareback porn. America is a free country, that operates by the free market economic system, people are able to express themselves freely artistically and commercially- if the product isn’t of your liking-forgo it and choose something else, but dont go around huffing and puffing and trying to berate those who choose differently. Alot of gay men are beginning to sound like the religious right (arrogant, self-righteous, incompassionate and hypercritical (sp))and it frightens me. The way you persuade someone to engage in safer sex practices is not by calling them nasty or murderers- it’s ironic as i dont think we lambast convicted felons like we do people who might engage in bareback sex. Besides there are other unafe practices prevalent in the gay community (e.g. substance abuse) that many tend to overlook.
    I will admit that i do watch bareback porn, both gay and straight, primarily because the sex in such movies are more unhinged, less scripted, more real and unpretentious. Its the same reason why i tend to like alot of the amateur/gonzo stuff.
    What i find funny is that alot of gay men are totally lashing out about gay barebackers, but on the other hand i see many of these same gay/bi men saying they like Lexington Steele (who does bareback in straight porn).
    Another over the top statement i hear is that its not okay for anyone in any situation to bareback- when i hear that i just wonder how any babies would come about. Also if someone is in a committed relationship- i dont think its anyone’s right to tell such persons what sexual activities they can and cant engage in and to what extent they should trust their partners.
    Anyhow its time for me to get off this soap box, i just wanted Chris to know that his fans support him and not to listen to some of the over the top comments many have posted- since many of those persons will be the first to buy the video when it comes out.

    I hope GPB doesn’t block this comment as they seem to do with my last. Just wanted to tell chris that we support you- mainstream porn has become really banal, formuliac and scripted, and see you as one of the porn producers who are trying to make a difference. PEACE


  55. fuckyeah January 19th, 2007 at 10:45 PM

    you wouldnt ask a stuntman to do stunts without nets and shit so why ask porn stars to fuck without condoms?

    i dont think anyone is expecting them to. some crazy bastard in here is making it look that way

    these guys are all adults and adults can make their own choices!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


  56. Rockshot January 20th, 2007 at 1:28 PM

    Hey what a fun site, y’all have the same taste in men that I do. SEXY!!!

    Anybody know of some tried and true MAN sites out there not into twinks.

    Let me know – see ya later,



  57. God January 20th, 2007 at 5:29 PM

    This isn’t the first time this porn trick has been used. Vivid has been doing it for years in their straight flicks.

    Check out my homepage for an article.


  58. Sebastion Fleckenheimer January 20th, 2007 at 5:30 PM

    This isn’t the first time this porn trick has been used. Vivid has been doing it for years in their straight flicks.

    Check out my homepage for an article.


  59. Luke January 21st, 2007 at 12:54 AM

    I do not want to see educational porn video, I understand that safe sex it’s fundamental, I always apply safe sex rules, but gay video are fantasy, or do you really beleive that there are guys that can fuck for 30 minutes without interruption? Hey guys safe sex it’s your responsibility but let me get off as I want, recently I get off with a McGurk video where a guy was tormented with a electric shock to his genitals, but I know it’s a fantasy and as well as cum swallow or bareback I would never do in real life.


  60. Anonymous January 22nd, 2007 at 9:05 PM

    i just whant sex


  61. KAL January 29th, 2007 at 9:59 PM

    Let’s face it, porn is an escape and fantasy from our everyday doldrum lives…I practice safe sex but I love watching bareback porn because it’s a turn on to watch something I don’t do.These models that do bareback know what potential risks are involved when doing them and don’t need to be “saved” from the opponents of BB porn.Obviously there is a HUGE market for bareback now and those of us that watch it aren’t going to be coerced into doing anything we don’t want to do, we aren’t children here.Watching bareback isn’t going to make me want to go out there and take 10 loads in my ass anymore than watching a show like 24 is going to make me go out there and kill people and blow shit up.


  62. Anonymous January 30th, 2007 at 8:17 PM

    Well said, Kal!


  63. Daniel February 9th, 2007 at 12:54 PM

    I need gay sex so bad its not even funny, i am in the army and cant come out, please e-mail me @ if u r hot and kive in Texas, i am in perfect shape u will love to fuck me!!!


  64. dan February 9th, 2007 at 2:54 PM

    i love gay porn i dont mind barebacking if u want it that way than it is cool i love it when a guy puts a condom on also i like cum around my ass it fills good so i say what ever floats ur boat go for it


  65. Robert February 13th, 2007 at 11:02 PM

    I want to get involved in gay porn if anyone can help me break into the industry that would be awesome I am totally a freak and have no idea where to start


  66. gay February 14th, 2007 at 3:36 AM

    plz i need pictures for sex


  67. warren February 17th, 2007 at 3:26 PM

    i think its hot :P


  68. acroxtreme February 18th, 2007 at 8:23 AM

    Okay so this may have been talked about somewhere on this page, but I seriously cannot read it all.

    In a lot of bareback porn the bottom sniffs a bottle of “i have no idea what’s in it” for “i have no idea the reason.”

    Could someone tell me what it is? Thanks!


  69. gayyy February 18th, 2007 at 8:22 PM

    omg i love bareback porn


  70. Anonymous February 19th, 2007 at 4:32 AM



  71. Alexander March 15th, 2007 at 10:15 AM

    its so fucking hot watching BB someone says is a fantasy represented on screen by actors who knows the risks and are adults to do what they want to do.
    who didn t have no condom sex with boyfriends realtionships? that is still BB sex like it or not or call it diferent to make it sounds less realistic.
    thank u all!


  72. Marty Navis March 16th, 2007 at 10:33 AM

    Fuck you jerks. BAREBACKING is the hottest. I stopped watching Raging Stallion recently because they no longer do oral cum shots, which were so hot in their films. Also, there models suck now. hairy gross pigs. before they were muscular smooth hot papis. what happened? and when are we goign to see the bb scenes


Leave a Reply