New Gay Meat: Dawson Riley

Posted October 10, 2009 9:46 PM by with 20 comments

gay-not-for-pay-porn-dawson-riley-shower-pic.jpg

Ever since Starrfucker blogger Jeremy Lucido leaked this picture of Dawson Riley in the shower, I’ve been waiting for the would-be model’s gay-on-gay scene. It showed up on Randy Blue this weekend (with veteran cock-smoker Johnny Angel). And good news … not only does he suck dick. He’s gay!

… I think. Proof after the jump.

dawson-gay-legalize-porn-shoot-randy-blue-pic.jpg

Or at least that’s what his t-shirt says. Of course, it could just be a trick to throw your gay-for-pay witch hunt off the scent. Lord knows that gay dick sucking and gay ass-fucking is no longer considered proof. Either way, he’s a beaut.

dawson-riley-gay-porn-randy-blue-bed-gallery.jpg

dawson-riley-shower-pic-randy-blue-starrfucker.jpg
gay-porn-dawson-riley-pic.jpg

Dawson with Johnny Angel (free preview clip)

Mike

Tags: , , , , ,

20 responses to New Gay Meat: Dawson Riley

  1. Anonymous October 11th, 2009 at 5:13 AM

    Lovely body and face, but average dick.

    Reply

  2. Anonymous October 11th, 2009 at 5:41 AM

    Not hot

    Reply

  3. naprem October 11th, 2009 at 9:17 AM

    He’s the boyfriend of another go-go boy / model / porn star (as other sites have been reporting for a while now), so yes, he’s gay.

    Reply

  4. Anonymous October 11th, 2009 at 2:43 PM

    He is a cutie and so what he has an average dick… im sure he knows how to work it….

    Reply

  5. Anonymous October 11th, 2009 at 6:31 PM

    def gay, and reportedly dating Josh Griffin.

    Reply

  6. Anonymous October 11th, 2009 at 6:34 PM

    Just saw him out last night at Super Cherry Pop in West Hollywood. His boyfriend, Josh Griffin, was dancing.

    Reply

  7. Anonymous October 12th, 2009 at 3:06 AM

    Is Randy claiming him to be straight, if as Randy says sexulaity is not an issue with him, why is he closeting some guy on his site? If that is the case there is no question that RB has to have some homophobic undertones, so why support a site like that?

    Reply

  8. ajbee October 12th, 2009 at 3:55 PM

    Randy has never claimed that Dawson is straight. In Dawson’s first Randy Blue Live show, he said he was gay.

    Reply

  9. MMDD October 12th, 2009 at 5:08 PM

    At this point I don’t believe any of the performers in the biz are genuinely gay, regardless of what they say or do. It’s all just about creating an illusion and making money anyway.

    Reply

  10. Tball October 12th, 2009 at 6:06 PM

    Randy Blue has never claimed Dawson was straight, to my knowledge. And, in fact, during Dawson’s debut live show on Randy Blue’s website, Dawson told us he was gay and shared a few of his experiences with us.

    And, yes, he’s dating Josh Griffin.

    So, nope, no need for any fans to launch any gay-for-pay witch hunts.

    Reply

  11. Anonymous October 13th, 2009 at 7:54 AM

    “Lord knows that gay dick sucking and gay ass-fucking is no longer considered proof.”

    Only to self-loathers.

    “If that is the case there is no question that RB has to have some homophobic undertones, so why support a site like that?”

    Because gays are icky and only straight-acting deserve our attention and money.

    I love how people in this country want to blame blacks, republicans, and religious people for the homophobia that affects the gay community yet most of the hate brought onto the gay community is brought on by other gay people.

    This site is supposed to be a GAY porn blog, yet all the articles are about sex with women and sex with “gay for pay” models. Pfftt.

    Reply

  12. Pablo October 13th, 2009 at 10:41 AM

    Gay-for-pay is just another term for straight-to-bed. I judge men by their actions, not their identities.

    Reply

  13. David October 14th, 2009 at 3:17 AM

    @ MMDD: if these guys were not “genuinely gay” as you said, they wouldn’t be having sex with other men in the first place. Use your common sense and don’t be so naive. Please.

    Reply

  14. fi October 14th, 2009 at 9:50 AM

    Isn’t screwed up and depressing though, this is gay porn -Gay Fucking Porn- and we have to assume that gay porn stars are straight before bi, bi before gay, kinda says a lot about being gay in the USA in 2009.

    Reply

  15. MMDD October 14th, 2009 at 3:47 PM

    David: These guys are not having sex with other men. They are performing sex acts with other men and getting paid for it. Big difference.

    Think about it: Gay men have sex with other men because they are genuinely attracted to them. Gay porn performers are merely performing the acts in order to bring to life a fantasy for the viewer. In other words, they are acting, just like any actor on a screen who plays gay. The difference is these guys engage in actual sex acts. They get together for the scene, and a director tells them everything to do. They perform the acts with some relatively feigned enthusiasm (if they’re decent performers), get a paycheck for the work done, and then most of them go home to their girlfriends and wives. It’s only a performance. There’s no real passion behind the acts, only dollar signs. And if you think otherwise, then honestly, you’re the one who’s being naive.

    Reply

  16. David October 15th, 2009 at 4:48 AM

    @ MMDD: If you were a straight guy, would you turn to gay porn to make money? Think about it. I mean, really. Why not do straight porn instead? Money being the sole motivator here is the lamest excuse that only people like you would buy into. After all, it is the one single obvious choice for a scapegoat for men who cannot bring themselves to identify as gay.

    Being gay is literally the biggest societal and personal taboo in this world we live in. Would a genuinely straight man purposely cross the line and break that taboo purely for monetary reasons, without any interest in sex with other men? Again, think about it.

    These “straight” guys are obviously not poor or starving, so why not try and make money any other way that has nothing to do with gay sex? That’s what I don’t get. Do you?

    You’re only contradicting what I’ve said because you just like the idea or fantasy of straight men having gay sex, and you know it. These “straight men” porn companies obviously capitalise on people just like you, so it’s a perfect fit, actually.

    Reply

  17. MMDD October 15th, 2009 at 2:51 PM

    David:

    “If you were a straight guy, would you turn to gay porn to make money?”

    I might, if I needed the money that badly.

    “Why not do straight porn instead?”

    You already know the answer to that question. Gay porn pays significantly better. If you needed money and could get a quick $5,000 just for fucking a woman, would you do it? Personally, I wouldn’t, but I’m not a porn performer, nor do I need the money that badly. The fact is it’s quick, easy money. Just because you or I couldn’t do it doesn’t mean others can’t. There are people out there who would eat shit off a floor for $100. Why is it so surprising to you that a straight guy might suck a dick or take one up the ass for a significant amount more?

    “Being gay is literally the biggest societal and personal taboo in this world we live in.”

    I agree with you there.

    “Would a genuinely straight man purposely cross the line and break that taboo purely for monetary reasons, without any interest in sex with other men?”

    Yes. They do it all the time. Welcome to the world of gay porn. Does a prostitute, hustler, or escort have to be sexually attracted to the person they’re fucking?

    “These ‘straight’ guys are obviously not poor or starving, so why not try and make money any other way that has nothing to do with gay sex?”

    As I said, it’s quick, easy, and good money. And with Viagra and straight porn playing in the background, clearly it’s not that big of a leap. You get hard, the camera starts rolling, and the editors take care of the rest.

    “You’re only contradicting what I’ve said because you just like the idea or fantasy of straight men having gay sex, and you know it.”

    LOL! OK, now that is REALLY funny because you know what? I absolutely HATE the idea of a straight man having gay sex. It doesn’t appeal to me at all, nor has it ever been a fantasy of mine. In fact, with very few exceptions, I never even watch gay porn anymore specifically for that reason. There’s nothing there for me to enjoy.

    “These ‘straight men’ porn companies obviously capitalise on people just like you, so it’s a perfect fit, actually.”

    If the companies wanted to capitalize on someone like me, then they would employ only real gay male performers (which ain’t never gonna happen), would only pair two guys together who were genuinely attracted to each other (which ain’t gonna happen), and would show more monogamous couples (which I can assure you is definitely not gonna to happen). Trust me…the gay porn industry would go out of business if they tried to suit my tastes!

    Reply

  18. Anonymous October 16th, 2009 at 3:08 AM

    “Gay porn pays significantly better.”

    That is a huge myth, Straight porn pays much better. Straight porn makes about 1Billion a year gay porn not even a small percentage of that.

    Straight Male pornstars like Charles Dera Julian and Kurt Lockwood and 100s more make much more cash than their gay counterparts, plus the demand for straight porn is higher so the make more of it and again that increase the pay pack, even Kristian aka Maxx Diesel, wrote this in his blog and gave it as one of reasons why he abandoned gay porn for straight porn.

    Yes some guys who do gay porn are straight, but these are the men that do not have either the looks or sexual magnetism of the top straight porn male models to make big wages. So Jeremy Walker, Leo Giamani, Vince Ferelli and Malachi Marx are (sorry to say this and with respect to those guys) straight porn rejects, guys who are not good enough to succeed in the straight porn, so guess what the roll it out (badly) for the “fag dollar”. Unfortunate to think the straight porn throw-outs are gay porn’s top stars.

    Reply

  19. David October 16th, 2009 at 4:06 AM

    @ MMDD: if what you’ve said above is correct, then your internalised homophobia must run deeper than I thought. You obviously find it hard to believe (or refuse to believe) that these men could be gay, and therefore you’d go to such lengths to defend their so-called heterosexual status.

    Sexuality is something that we can’t see. Just because a man says he’s straight it doesn’t mean that he is. But when he’s out there doing all sorts of not-so-straight stuff with other men in the name of money and yet claiming to be straight, well, you just need to use your common sense to figure out the truth, really.

    I cannot decide which is more cringe-worthy: “gay-for”pay” men who try to fool other people (and themselves) into thinking that they’re straight, or those who blindly believe them.

    From reading all your comments above, it’s kind of obvious that the way you think seems quite similar to the way some of those naive and ignorant straight people think; those who don’t want to believe that there are way a lot more gay people than what their selective and stereotyping eyes can see.

    Have a look at the spot-on comment that someone called “fi” left above, about the current state of homophobia in society. It’s worth reiterating that homophobia is prevalent not only among straight people, but also within ourselves (yes, me included) as gay men.

    Reply

  20. Anonymous December 10th, 2009 at 3:07 AM

    I know the truth & you’re all right in some way

    Reply

Leave a Reply