LUCKY JAYDEN! THE RANDY BLUE BOTTOM’S SCANDALOUS DP

Posted August 10, 2012 8:03 AM by with 3 comments

GAY PORN TUBE: RANDY BLUE SEES DOUBLE PENETRATION

It’s like Christmas morning in gay porn world. I hadn’t even rubbed the sleepers from my eyes before I logged on to see which Randy Blue star had taken two poles in one hole. The Randy Blue double penetration video, after the jump …

As for our contest, some of you got an ass here or a dick there, but mostly it was wishful thinking (Diego Sans was a popular choice).

Sean Zevran, Caleb Strong and Jayden Tyler (via Randy Blue)

Mike

Related:
Guess Randy Blue Star Got Double Fucked, Win Gay Porn

Tags: , ,

3 responses to LUCKY JAYDEN! THE RANDY BLUE BOTTOM’S SCANDALOUS DP

  1. Andrew August 13th, 2012 at 2:43 PM

    Looks Hot but then so do most of there previews sadly when you actually watch the films there really actually quiet rubbish! “randy” of randy blue has in my oppinion just got lazy! the site is promoted as 2 thing’s firstly as an “amateur” site so you’d expect it to be a little more raw and reel than a porno but it’s way way to glammed up and shiney! and secondly as a gay sight featuring mostly straight men having gay sex but it’s mostly just gay on gay sex now which is fine but stop false advertising the “straight” angle!

    Gave up on randyblue ages ago as its formulated crap! there’s no originality no mixing it up with the guys I.E older guys/ younger guys, muscle guys, slimmer guys if anybody watching wants some real good porn log into men.com it’s so much better!!! now that shit is flipping HOT!! unlike randy blue (blue as in blue balls cause it’s void and has been for some time now of actual performer/performance hotness!)

    Reply

  2. Jay August 17th, 2012 at 11:01 AM

    I don’t get your second objection to the site. You say it’s false advertising because it’s a gay site featuring gay on gay sex,….huh, WHAT?. Have you considered how phenomenally nonsensical that sounds?

    Can you describe how a gay site of ‘mostly straight men having gay sex’ would be different from one of ‘mostly just gay on gay sex’, I’m really curious, please explain.

    Reply

  3. michael August 21st, 2012 at 4:13 AM

    Hmmm have to say i agree with the first comment randyblue is getting pretty lame of late and your pretty spot on with how you describe the site, didnt get confused like the other guy clearly did lol

    Reply

Leave a Reply



ABOUT US | EMAIL US