|
|
September 27, 2009
Gay Before and After: Jeremy Walker Has Us Asking "Who's That Daddy?

Maybe it's my gay obsession with Randy Blue's Malachi Marx that distracted me, or maybe was it sunburn but for a good part of his gay flip-flop fuck this weekend with Malachi, I thought Jeremy Walker was a new model. "It's about time that Randy Blue added in a guy with a little fur," I thought and then realized that I've been rubbing them out to Jeremy for nearly two gay years. Above, Jeremy as he first appeared in early 2008. After the jump Jeremy, as he looked this weekend ...
Perhaps he was gearing up for Folsom?
-- Mike
More ...
... Malachi Marx and Jeremy Walker (free gallery and clips @RandyBlue.com)
... Jeremy (sans hair), Reese and Ryan (free gallery and clips @RandyBlue.com)
Related:
RandyBlue's Gay Threeway to Commemorate the Labor Day Three Day
Folsom Street Fair a Blast for Gay Porn Fans
Posted in: gay amateur sites, gay porn before and after, gayporn, Jeremy Walker, Randy Blue
A very sad change to Jeremy if you ask me. He looked so much sexier when he was less hairy. Even Jeremy doesn't like it.
Posted by: Angelfan at September 27, 2009 12:17 PMI couldn't disagree more! I knew he had it in him, and I'm glad he let it grow out. Go hair! Beat Nair!
Posted by: at September 27, 2009 12:34 PMthe pick where Malachi is blowing him is so much hotter than anything ive seen on randyblue yet
Posted by: Cad at September 27, 2009 12:35 PMYes the hair gets my vote....He looks more like a man now... Love him
Posted by: Patrick at September 27, 2009 2:38 PMLove the hair; he is so much hotter with it. Hate the trends of the past few years: shaving (I'm not interested in men looking like girls) and even worse, tatoos. Disgusting!
Posted by: Peter E at September 27, 2009 2:50 PMLove the hair; he is so much hotter with it. Hate the trends of the past few years: shaving (I'm not interested in men looking like girls) and even worse, tatoos. Disgusting!
Posted by: Peter E at September 27, 2009 2:50 PMmay god ponish u guys
Posted by: at September 27, 2009 6:08 PMI hate to sound stupid but I am really confused by this post. I see a guy that is trimmed but hairy and then a guy with minimal hair and some facial hair. I dont see a big difference. But the article makes it seem there is supposed to be a huge difference. I cant tell which guy is which, the guy getting fucked or fucking?
I dont see how this deserved a post or how guys are commenting on this.
Am I alone in this feeling?
I don't believe he was gay before or after. And his scene with Malachi was a bust, Jeremy pretty much laid there and tried to look pretty. I'd be all over Malachi like a cheap suit.
Posted by: Spongey at September 27, 2009 6:34 PMWow, this is a very nice guy and he is realy hot! :)
Posted by: Gay Sexkontakte at September 27, 2009 11:52 PMGreatly prefer the natural look. Jeremy is GORGEOUS.
Posted by: Healthnut at September 28, 2009 6:28 AMMary Mary, quite contrary!
Posted by: at September 28, 2009 7:50 AMwow... where would gay porn be without copious amounts of steroids and viagra!
this is a steroid miracle if i ever saw one.
Posted by: loqueesha at September 28, 2009 9:54 AMI think Jeremy looks amazing with or without hair. I wouldn't kick him out of the bed ever!
Posted by: James M at September 28, 2009 11:06 AMI hate Randyblue, It is killing gay porn, it has created such an sexual apathy by using so many gay for pay straight models like both Jeremy & Malachi who look like road kill, in the scene they have no ense of gay sexuality at all, what is the point gay porn if the "gay" is removed and replaced by revulsion. I'll never understand who any gay man wants to look at two men straight men cringe through bad gay sex?
I guess it just a sad little fetish I don't get, gay porn has just got so boring and straight, it's all about straight men.
Posted by: at September 29, 2009 9:10 AMI agree with the comments above (Randyblue killing gay porn). To me, it doesn't matter how hot they look, if they're not into it it's just a complete turn-off.
Posted by: dinky2009 at September 29, 2009 3:36 PM"Jeremy" needs a new hair style. he looks like he's got a toupee. he needs to stay from whatever is making his skin look radioactive. otherwise he's hot and handsome. the hairier the better. but the scene where he gets fucked was a bore.
Posted by: hot4hair at September 29, 2009 6:59 PMJeremy looks superb all furred up. Call me a self-loathing gay, but I love watching str8 guys fucking and sucking. Especially hairy ones!
The gays monopolize gay porn. Give the str8s a chance. And if any gays want to do str8 porn, they are more than welcome to do so!
Posted by: hairystud at September 30, 2009 7:02 PMvery well
Posted by: anoop at October 2, 2009 4:04 AMYo, 'hairystud', I've got news for ya, you don't love 'str8' guys fucking and sucking because there's not such a thing. You love to see gays fucking as much as the rest of us. The gays monopolize gay porn alright, too bad most of them don't have the balls to accept themselves.
Posted by: Jay at October 7, 2009 7:14 PMJeremy getting fucked? I don't believe it just as I don't believe in fairy tales.
Posted by: Buddy at October 21, 2009 11:31 AMoh my god i thought jeremy walker was perfect before, but after seeing this...i can't imagine any man being any sexier! i want my tongue all over that hairy body. Btw, him and Malachi make like the perfect couple
Posted by: at November 8, 2009 11:41 AM




