Gay Porn Blog is a free gay blog from two guys who work in the gay porn industry updated daily with the lastest industry news, reviews, interviews and the hottest free hardcore pictures, trailers and clips.

August 7, 2009

Gay Porn Milestones: Arpad Miklos Goes Straight-For-Pay

arpad_mikos_top_1.jpg

Today Jake Cruise, a move that will no doubt stir up the hornet's nest of straight-for-pay controversy, is releasing a scene of Aprad Miklos fucking a woman on SG4GE.com. While SG4GE stands for for "Straight Guys For Gay Eyes", Arpad is still absolutely, 100% openly gay. (Also of note: this scene was not directed by Jake but by Jasun Mark of GayDailyHot.)

arpad_mikos_top_2.jpg

While I find the concept for this hot -- I really do -- I think it would be more exciting to see Arpad bottom for a man, a dildo, a woman wearing a strap-on, but it's something he's vowed never to do (on camera, at least).

PLEASE NOTE: VERY GRAPHIC PHOTOGRAPHS OF FEMALE GENITALIA AFTER THE JUMP. You have been warned.

gay-for-pay-arpad-miklos-1.jpg

gay-for-pay-arpad-miklos-2.jpg gay-for-pay-arpad-miklos-3.jpg gay-for-pay-arpad-miklos-4.jpg gay-for-pay-arpad-miklos-5.jpg gay-for-pay-arpad-miklos-6.jpg

Arpad Miklos fucks a woman on SG4GE
Buy Return To Sun Valley Bareback" from GayDVD
JakeCruise.com

RELATED:
Chi Chi Invents Straight-for-Pay
Happy Gay Porn Halloween
Mixed Emotions: Jake Cruise with Mike Roberts
Arpad Miklos Conquers Pussy Victoriously (Fleshbot)

Posted by Jack at August 7, 2009 2:07 PM
Posted in: Arpad Miklos, Jake Cruise, Jasun Mark, straight guys for gay eyes


Comments

You forgot to mention that he fucks this woman bareback, but with guys he always wears a condom. A total double standard and a total boner killer. I hope he had fun. He's totally unappealing to me now.

Posted by: MMDD at August 7, 2009 12:53 PM

He looks far more natural with a woman than he does a guy. Perhaps this should be no surprise, considering the protestation and enabling going on about him being "gay" on this and other sites.

A tad contrived too that on the same day another Jake Cruise site (Cock Sure Men) releases a video of him fucking a guy. Damage control? -- "See I really am gay."

Disturbing that he barebacks a female but uses a condom with a male. What kind of message is that sending? Women are safe and men are dangerous? Women are clean and men are dirty? Doesn't give a shit if he gives something to her?

Desperate. Truly desperate.

Posted by: mco at August 7, 2009 1:15 PM

This is not a milestone nor is it attractive in the least. Isn't this GAY PORN BLOG ? This is not playboy or hustler...if I wanted to see some gay guy fuck a chick I would log into a straight site. I never have like Arpad but this is ridiculous!!!!
I think I threw up in my mouth, twice!
Hooray for you Jake Cruise, first off you look like Celine Dions husband who looks more like her Dad then anything else, then you pay all this hot men to fuck you on cam or you to fuck them..gross now I am throwing up again...and now, now you put this on your site ? You trying to get people to watch your site or you trying to watch people leave ?

Posted by: Anon at August 7, 2009 1:48 PM

I like Arpad but not his attitude. He looks desperate for money to have to fuck a woman on camera for a low budget video. He has bottomed so many times for gay men and his ex bf Collin O Neal. What in the world is the big deal that he says he wont do it on film? That is so silly and now I am beginning not to like him. He acts like what he enjoys in private and gay men enjoy a shameful act or something. Hey Arpad, quick acting straight and bottom on camera!!!!

Posted by: Jay at August 7, 2009 1:51 PM

Why the hell is he not wearing a condon?

Posted by: thewhat at August 7, 2009 3:47 PM

ARPAD MIKLOS?????
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
:s

Posted by: Josh at August 7, 2009 6:27 PM

I guess he doesn't think he'll get aids from fucking a girl.

Posted by: at August 7, 2009 6:31 PM

No, he's not straight. But his ass sure ain't gay. Ever heard of the word "bisexual" Arpad?

Posted by: bma83 at August 7, 2009 7:04 PM

what the HELL! why would i wanna see a sexy gay bear fuck an unattractive woman! talk about desperate! This sexy gay man should be fucking ME! not sum ugly chick! and she had ugly drawn on eyebrows too! this iz gay porn blog not straight porn blog!!!

Posted by: catdude124 at August 7, 2009 7:09 PM

what the HELL! why would i wanna see a sexy gay bear fuck an unattractive woman! talk about desperate! This sexy gay man should be fucking ME! not sum ugly chick! and she had ugly drawn on eyebrows too! this iz gay porn blog not straight porn blog!!!

Posted by: catdude124 at August 7, 2009 7:09 PM

What the hell is hot about this? If I wanted to see a man fuck a woman I'd watch a straight man do it. Not some bisexual claiming to be gay. Thanks Arpad, now that I've seen that you are a bisexual my dick will become limp whenever I see you.

Posted by: bma83 at August 7, 2009 7:10 PM

I just saw a preview of the Cocksure Men clip, and he used a condom with the guy. What a total slap in the face to every gay viewer. I have absolutely no respect for this guy now. As far as I'm concerned, he needs to stick with pussy from now on.

Posted by: MMDD at August 7, 2009 7:16 PM

Gross, total and perpetually turn off, he looks kinda creepy in those pics too, and the comment he wrote regarding it, "Oh I only watch straight porn, I fucked her so hard she was swollen for three days." and "Everyone thought I was straight." He sounded like a total insufferable self-loathing asshole, I deleted all my Arpard related porn.


And he barebacks, yeah HIV and AIDS is a "Fag" thing right? So over him.

Posted by: boo at August 8, 2009 2:02 AM

Everyone-

The fact that Arpad is fucking this girl bareback is because Jake tests all his model for HIV through AIM. I don't think it's a statement against gay people like this.

Posted by: tellie at August 8, 2009 6:21 AM

This is just Arpad Miklos trying to make a living.
In the last few gay films he made he wasn't good. Perhaps this is the only work he can get now. Its a shame really, perhaps he should go back to Russia and get a proper job.

Posted by: Peter at August 8, 2009 8:14 AM

Im like everyone on this site. Arpad was so hot to me until I saw the ugly bitch under him in this photos. If the girl actually looked a little decent I probably wouldnt have a big problem but this chick looks like a trash bag and he hardly seems comfortable filming this scene.

Posted by: James M at August 8, 2009 8:27 AM

If he's willing to do THIS for money now in his career, mark my words he will bottom after the offers stop rolling in. I just don't want it to be so far down the road that he's really old and unattractive.

Posted by: Dillon at August 8, 2009 10:03 AM

Shows what a complete whore he is.

Posted by: D at August 8, 2009 10:08 AM

Obviously Arpad did not learn anything form the Blake Riley debacle. Arpad's career was close to the end, I think this will end it sooner than maybe he hoped, (the same situation certainly cut for Riley's career rather considerably).


Maybe other gay porn models should take note, the people who will get turned off by this out weight the number who will get turned on, greatly, and once you turn them off, you can't turn them back on.


Goodbye Arpad, we hardly knew ya.

Posted by: F.I. at August 8, 2009 10:31 AM

I'm glad F.I. mentioned Blake Riley. Ironically it was exactly a year ago (this month, in fact) when that whole "straight for pay," "I fucked a girl and I liked it" mess exploded. Blake handled it very poorly, and his career never recovered. He still did movies, but with the exception of a few desperate die-hards, his core fan base abandoned him.

To Blake's credit, he used a condom in his straight scenes, so there's absolutely NO excuse why Arpad didn't do the same. Though it's not common, at least one other performer on sg4ge has used a condom. Again, no excuse, especially since he always uses condoms with guys.

Thankfully Blake left the biz last month. I hope Arpad does the same.

Posted by: MMDD at August 8, 2009 12:18 PM

I'm reading the comments and am baffled by the INTOLERANCE being displayed by gay men.

Imagine if straight guys got FURIOUS at the favorite female starlets when they did lesbian scenes?

Kind of sad that the gay men posting commetns here are less intolerant about sexuality than most straight men.

I'm kind of embarssed I have to say

Posted by: tom at August 8, 2009 2:59 PM

Arpad I never liked you with men and like you even less with this skank!
Gay porn blog what the &%#@ are you thinking, why the hell would you put that shit on this blog for.
Next time you show a clam it better be for a red lobster commercial.
YUCK!

Posted by: T-Bird at August 8, 2009 4:15 PM

This is gross. I feel like I could catch an STD just from looking at it.

Posted by: Dawson at August 8, 2009 4:33 PM

This is just so gross. Always sad when a model well past their sell-by date has no other options and has to keep doing porn beyond the point anybody wants to see them.

Posted by: AJ Turner at August 8, 2009 4:48 PM

Why do you post this kind of shit on a gay blog? I hope Arpad goes the way of Blake Riley, too. Good riddance. And Jake Cruise is a disgusting pervert for even conceiving and producing this. Of course, that may be a compliment for him. I am boycotting all of his sites and will encourage others to do so. He gives our community a bad reputation in an already volatile world. Stupid, selfish man.

Posted by: Dominik at August 8, 2009 8:01 PM

I'm fine with this lol.

Posted by: James at August 8, 2009 11:05 PM

"Kind of sad that the gay men posting comments here are less intolerant about sexuality than most straight men."

I think tom you maybe be missing the point, I think a lot of gay men get pissesd at this because homophobia is not just tolerated in America, it is in fact encouraged.

To alot of gay men this is just another form of this. The sort of "it's not good enough to be just gay." Gay men are still dealing with a huge amount of hate, injustice and intolerance more than any other minority in America.

So for that reason, somehow, issues get confused and this touches a never for a lot of gay men, like it or not.

Arpad have every right to do what he wishes as long as it legal, but with that gay men also have every right to get pissed of and telling him to "fuck off."

Porn is a fantasy, a delicate illusion, ruin the fantasy and the illusion shatters. That is just how it works, you may but like it but for right now, straight for pay is one of the worst things a porn star can do.

Arpad and other models who do that just have to suck it up and deal with it.



Posted by: v at August 9, 2009 2:19 AM

what is hot about this??? I don't want to watch straight porn, so why would I want to watch Arpad fuck some chick? I do like Arpad, but seeing him with a woman is a complete turn off.

Posted by: b r I c e at August 9, 2009 5:51 AM

Does GayPornBlog have a policy on barebacking/unsafe sex? If not, they should. Without question, this blog is more promotional than journalistic. I have no problem with that. But, I do have a problem with the promotion of sites that have bareback content. (Pre-AIDS barebacking is okay, as far as I'm concerned.)

GayPornBlog should not promote any of Jake Cruise's sites, as they often contain barebacking content. And, as far as the AIM testing is concerned, the tests narrow the window of infection. But, they do not eliminate that window. Jake Cruise is knowing putting his performers at risk of contracting HIV and other STDs just to make a buck. That's shameful; and GayPornBlog should not help him.

Posted by: alex at August 9, 2009 11:57 AM

Barf! I think everyone has said it already and I'm in agreement. More barfing, blech!

Posted by: Spongey at August 9, 2009 1:38 PM

What's the big deal. There are tons of gay for pay actors so why can't he try it with a woman? Double standard guys. Its a woman he's fucking, not a sheep!

Posted by: James at August 9, 2009 6:58 PM

Thoes pictures do not flatter Arpad, he is getting really old looking, what age is he now? In his mid 50s? He should have retired ages ago, YUCK!

Posted by: at August 10, 2009 1:55 AM

I agree with the fact that the whole "straight for pay" thing is just wrong, but i don't get what's up with all the nasty comments about Arpad wanting to try it? It's his choice and we shouldn't judge him on that. But, i rekon there is no way a "100%" gay man would fuck a woman whether he is a porn star or not. It just means hes either bi-curious or just plain bi. I can look at women and say "yeah she's hot!" and all that but as far as sexually wise they do nothing for me, i have never been with a woman and i don't need to to prove my sexuality! So with that being said i rekon Arpad is bi and he just wanted to show it on camera.

Posted by: Brent at August 10, 2009 1:58 AM

this guy was for me one of the hottest pornactors as HE IS a REAL MAN...and looking as his body and ass is amazing.....but honestly I am totally turned off watching him fucking this blond "thing" and what me bothers most is that everyone seems to change his sexlife for a good money-offer.....if they are gay...they should stay gay.

Posted by: at August 10, 2009 3:20 AM

I was a bit torn when I first read about Arpad doing "Straight For Pay" porn. I've always found him incredibly sexy and from the photos that still holds true for me. Before I discovered gay porn, I used to watch Steve Drake in straight porn and jack off watching him.
It's the detail of Arpad doing the straight porn without a condom. You'd never see him without one in a gay porn. Perhaps if he had done bareback in a gay porn this wouldn't seem like such a slap in the face.
Is Arpad nearing the end of porn career? Possibly, it seems he's heading that way with the more frequent clips of him fucking anyone on any pay-site. Or perhaps it's Arpad's way of adapting to the changing times since major studios have seen a decline in sales.

Posted by: jryan73 at August 10, 2009 4:51 AM

This is absurd. Ive never seen so many vehement comments from a bunch of gay men over something so trivial.

The man is making a living having sex on camera. God forbid he try and do it on the other side of the sexuality fence.

So he's not wearing a condom, so what? when did porn become the bully pulpit for condom use? I practice safe sex because its smart to, not because porn tells me to. porn is a fantasy, as someone previously stated, where things like STDs and such nasty things associated with sex don't exist.

In closing, to everyone crying about his barebacking: get over it, you've done it to and its not his job to dictate the worlds gay porn viewing population their condom use.

Posted by: Dan at August 10, 2009 9:43 AM

I agree it is Arpad’s absolute right to do this, he is primarily bisexual after all. But there is a consequence to this, and I think like Chichi and Blake Riley, it is a very myopic professional strategy . Arpad may say, “if you do not like it don’t watch it, watch one of my gay films.” but there in lies the fault, after seeing this there is a high chance the majority of guys don’t wish to watch him in anything, gay or straight.

That is what happened to Blake, the idea Chichi put forward was don’t watch Shifting Gears, watch Blake in another gay film, but the people didn’t buy it, guys just stopped watch Blake altogether. The few films he made after that drizzled into nothing and hence he had no option but to leave the business, it was almost as if he were “box office poison” and any film he appeared was financially unsuccessful.

And the same fate awaits Arpad, I can only assume he got a pay-off and is planning to retire, films he is associated with past or future will probably not sell well, therefore he wont get hired, at the end of the day it is about money, by doing this Arpad has ensured studios and gay sites he will only lose them money, so he pretty much is totally over.

No wonder gay porn is losing so much money, the industry has totally lost its relationship with its audience. Right now they have zero idea what consumers want.

Posted by: W at August 10, 2009 10:37 AM

Jake and Arpad...Fired!!!

Posted by: tim at August 10, 2009 11:10 AM

What a ultimate looser.. hitting 40 n still fucking for pennies..he is gross..should of been out of the business long ago..can we say expired face n body?..:-)

Posted by: Max at August 10, 2009 11:14 AM

I must be one of the few guys on the planet who really is looking forward to this video - I am 44 and I do like looking at men near my own age have sex as well as young guys (and while I love Arpad, there is no way in hell he is 38, which is what his website says is his age.)

Anyway I know he just filmed a scene for Michael Lucas just last week, so I would not consider him "over" just yet.

Posted by: Richard at August 10, 2009 7:51 PM

I must be one of the few guys on the planet who really is looking forward to this video - I am 44 and I do like looking at men near my own age have sex as well as young guys (and while I love Arpad, there is no way in hell he is 38, which is what his website says is his age.)

Anyway I know he just filmed a scene for Michael Lucas just last week, so I would not consider him "over" just yet.

Posted by: Richard at August 10, 2009 7:51 PM

"Anyway I know he just filmed a scene for Michael Lucas just last week, so I would not consider him "over" just yet. "


I'm not sure which is more gross, the straight scene or working with Lucas.

Posted by: fi at August 11, 2009 10:48 AM

I like straight porn (usually gangbangs) and I've always liked Arpad, but this just seems desperate.

That woman is ugly. As for Arpad not wearing a condom, well, that was probably to help him stay hard. There's no way a "top" can stay hard when he's not attracted to someone AND is wearing a condom. Guess there's viagra though.

I didn't really get the big deal with Riley (awesome bottom, sigh) but that did damage his career. He was really popular before and then wham, over! So this was a dumb move on Arpad's part.

He should have created some daddy niche market. The only hot scene he's had lately is the one with Zach Randall. I wouldn't bottom if I were him (it might ruin the "illusion" for some) plus, I think most people prefer their bottoms to be in the 20's-30's age range. I do. Arpad is like 50?

Or he should have gone behind the scenes and made money that way.

Posted by: at August 11, 2009 11:07 AM

Is that Mr. Pam he's fucking?

Posted by: Mort at August 11, 2009 1:49 PM

Oh, for crying out loud it was an assignment, a PR move.It was a job.I applaud his efforts really. He didn't wear a condom because he is HIV negative and so is she, thats how that industry works. Can every gay/bisexual man posting a comment here honestly say that they have always used a condom every time?I think not.

Posted by: Walter V at August 11, 2009 4:55 PM

I want to put another perspective on this debate as whilst there have been a lot of drama queens writing on here about his looks and non use of protection, I find calling the lady a bitch or whatever offensive.

I could, for example, criticise him for screwing twinks like that thin guy in that one he did where he did a massage. I would prefer to see him with his usual muscle large and hairy guys, but that's me.

It's his choice, but to personally attack her - I think it comes down to a lot that he's not inside the whingers on here but inside a woman. Now who would have thought that was wrong?

Oh and as for him bottoming - bring it on. If we can see Zeb suck cock then I don't mind Arped with legs in the air. God, everyone seems to want to dictate what porn stars can or can't do when these actors will simply ignore your requests and do it anyway.

Posted by: Michael (Australia) at August 11, 2009 8:24 PM

Yo Walter and others defending his not wearing a condom; the issue is not simply whether they're both healthy, the issue is the double standard. There are plenty of healthy gay porn stars, yet no mainstream gay porn star would even consider going bareback on camera with another healthy gay porn star; that would be considered shocking, a bad example, etc. etc. This implies it is 'natural' to have straight sex, but risky and dirty to have gay sex. Oh and I don't care if he fucks a girl, but can it at least be a hot one?

Posted by: Albert at August 12, 2009 7:18 AM

yuck!

Posted by: mike at August 12, 2009 8:08 PM

I too want to weigh in on the negative comments about the girl, which I find really unnecessary and offensive. On Fleshbot, Arpad himself even referred to her as a bitch, which makes me lose even more respect for him.

The fact is, he could have been paired with a really fake-looking, overly breasted chick, but I think Holly is actually quite pretty and, in my opinion, much more of a natural-looking beauty than you tend to see in porn anyway. Whether you agree with me or not is fine, but calling her names and saying nasty things about her looks is completely out of line.

Posted by: MMDD at August 13, 2009 3:07 PM

These straight-bait (g4p) porn sites really want to drive home the illusion that really straight guys really have gay sex and this is part of that agenda.

If we all could change like that on a dime, then Focus on the Family, NOM, and every "ex-gay" group is right.

Selling out gays for a few bucks of profits.

Posted by: Chrissypoo at August 13, 2009 4:16 PM

Poor guy, you can tell that the aging process is taking a toll on him ha? Even while watching his movies, he seems so desperate and I get the feeling that some guys really are not into him at all. The video on onthehunt with Jeremy Hall made it so apparent. But in the end, I gues everyone needs to make a living and going to the straight side may be his next move, how sad :(

Posted by: Lukkyx247 at August 13, 2009 11:39 PM

I watched the video and is was hot. Arpad made a smart move. He may piss off people of boring mainstream gay tastes, but he's pushing boundaries and fucking doing it with a smile. Good work!

Posted by: LeMenu at August 14, 2009 10:35 AM

OK people.. you have NO idea how hurt I am that with this much hysteria and hating going on that none of it is directed at me. I directed the damn scene, people, can't you all hate on me a bit too? I'm feeling left out.

As far as Arpad goes, it would be hot to see him fuck the drain hole in my shower. He's stunning.

Posted by: Jasun mark at August 14, 2009 1:03 PM

Jasun, you are vile scum. We all know you made this video to get reactions from everybody. I saw you whoring yourself over at the Justusboys.com forums getting praise from the bisexuals. I bet you thought we'd give you the same response. We'll dude, as you can see you've got another thing coming.

As for the gay guys watching straight porn. I watch straight porn too. But not for the girls. The guys in straight porn are generally better looking and more endowed then gay porn stars(They also know what their sexuality is, unlike 50% of the "gay porn stars") . I read Arpad's post on Fleshbot and he wrote himself that he gave up fucking pussy 10 years ago. Which is recent. If Arpad was bi all along he should have been open about. Maybe he's just an ugly, old, and desperate whore.

RIP Arpad Mikos's porn career

10,000 BC - 2009 Present Day.

Posted by: Casey at August 14, 2009 6:01 PM

I hope that Arpad are grateful with Jake Cruise for ending with his beautiful career that now is the worst.

If Arpad was thinking to retire I think that it was not the way of doing it. I am very disappointed of Arpad Miklos.

The video about fucking a girl was really stupid. Anyway Arpad did his own tomb.

Posted by: Dan at August 14, 2009 10:43 PM

To underscore a point that others have touched on in various forums, I think one of the most insulting aspects of this whole straight for pay phenomenon is the way the studios and performers themselves are going out of their way to tell us how the performers enjoyed fucking these women and emphasizing how relatively easy it was for them. Blake Riley repeatedly talked about how much fun he had doing his bi movie and bragged about being hard as a rock the entire time. Now Arpad is talking about how he enjoyed the experience, and the sg4ge site is promoting it with statements like "if he's nervous you certainly can't tell" and "there's no doubt he had a great time experimenting."

Now compare that to the countless gay for pay performers who do scenes with guys and then talk about how they had to think about pussy or look at pussy porn to stay hard, how they didn't really enjoy the experience but faked it all for the sake of a performance, or how they feel no sexual attraction to men whatsoever. Yet another lovely double standard in this biz of "gay" porn, where sex with women is praised as something everyone should enjoy, regardless of their orientation. Consider even the title of this thread: Arpad has achieved a "gay porn milestone," a high point in his career because he finally fucked a woman on camera.

And we as consumers are supposed to think it's all "hot." Just amazing.

Posted by: MMDD at August 15, 2009 8:46 AM

I always loved Arpad, but no more. This was horrific. This is a new low for gays and gay porn.

While I have no problem seeing nude pics of straight men, I've always hated the predominance of straight-for-pay porn stars (and gay men's acceptance of them) and this is an even MORE disturbing concept. To Miklos, this might have just been a job, but to us, this is both betrayal and more of the same self-loathing bullshit we've been seeing all our lives.

And like everyone else, I think it's sick that he's not using a condom with this bitch. He owes the entire gay community a gigantic apology, and he needs to retire as an act of contrition.

I never want to see him again!

Posted by: Oa at August 15, 2009 3:50 PM

EWWW....Grandad porn, GROSS! I don't if it's gay sex or straight sex, but come on, at least have some hot dude, not some old, smelly, fugly grandad.

Posted by: H at August 16, 2009 7:15 AM

Totally agree with MMDD ! Also haven't you noticed since the introduction of viagra we have more and more gay porn actors going with women ! funny that isn't it ? he looks totally uncomfortable and ill at ease in these scenes it's embarrassing, what really really bugs me is this sham 'pay for gay' basically it's Bisexual men who are completely fucked up about their sexuality ! hey wake up dude get a grip you like cock too !!!!! no big deal.

Posted by: Cosmo at August 19, 2009 7:26 AM

Okay, here is the thing, and it really bugs me, Why is it not good enough just to be gay? Why does every gay man HAVE to have straight sex? What is so FUCKING amazing and fantastic and revolutionary about a supposed gay man having straight sex, hello closet cases have been doing it for fucking centuries, and I thought we got beyond that homophobic self hating bullshit but sadly no. Trying to be straight sex it prevails.


Why isn't being just gay good enough? Why is it so important for gay men to have straight sex? This isn't about sexual liberation, it is the exact opposite, and it is about not wanting to be a total fag.

Arpad is total closet licking loser, and he is about as sexy as a bucket of sick. I think this whole thing and everyone involved in it is retarded. And don't get off Jasun on the idea I hate you , because I've guessed that is what you are into, I don't kind of care or respect you enough to get pissed at you personally, I just think you are just a fat twat.

Posted by: Fake Id at August 19, 2009 9:38 AM

Who are you calling fat?

Posted by: Jasun mark at August 20, 2009 12:45 PM

fucking die!

Posted by: aru at August 23, 2009 6:28 AM

gross!!

Posted by: aru at August 23, 2009 6:31 AM

This shows the worst side of porn which is the exploitation of the models. There isn’t any real concern for Arpad, how he may take the hate, the fact that in all probability it ended his career, and the old, ugly has been, desperate, pathetic comments all true, but still it must sort of distressing to hear. Not only that but that Jasun Mark person is deliberately shit stirring, aggravating people to be more and more cruel and hateful toward Arpad just to get publicity for his site, he has no interest in the models welfare and not because he filmed a straight scene, but he takes great delight in the maltreatment and derision of one oh his model, not only but he is actively encouraging it just to bring attention to his site, truly despicable, amoral person.


All in all it is very sad and very depressing, and really shines a light on the immoral, exploitive and harmful side of the industry. I’m sure they’ll try it again, and hopefully people will just ignore them and hopefully they’ll go away.

Posted by: fi at August 26, 2009 3:04 AM

I've never posted my opinions online. I'm not big on the online chatting/debating of issues. I'm a 'relaxed straight-acting' good looking proud gay man of 37. To those of you who think "it's the same" that a gay man advertise that he's slept with a woman as it is for a straight man to say he's slept with a man then you must not live on this planet. I don't say that sarcastically. In the regular world, straight men rarely, if ever, admit to having done anything with any guy ever. I think they go to the grave with it if they have. I have a close straight friend but I don't think he'd ever admit, even to me, that he's been with a guy [if he had]. Yes, straight women sometimes do, but it's not the same. You know that, right?! Yet, I constantly run into social situations where gay men feel compelled to share their 'straight past'. Why? Because, while gay men want to say we're all equal and should have equal rights, they seem to have some psychological issue that tells them that they need to have lost their 'straight virginity' to be able to say that they're gay.... because 'straight' is the superior nature. If this describes you, then realize you are part of the problem with our culture today. Remember, what you think of yourself, often times is what others think of you. You, metaphysically and substantially, contribute to us [gay men] not achieving equality in this world. If, since and when coming out [as a gay man], you've ever 'shared too much' ["I'd be with you if I was straight";"I sometimes look at a girl and wonder if I'd enjoy fucking her"...etc.] with a straight friend; if you've ever danced provocatively at a gay or straight nightclub with a female; if you've ever made out with your female friend (usually when you're drunk and 'just for fun', 'just to shock and keep them guessing') in a crowd, you've contributed to the problem. Why? Because they're [the straight world] not on the same 'wavelength' as you. You may see it as harmless, but they [the straight world] talk and share amongst themselves, just like we do about them without them present to be able to correct us. In today's world they have even more of an opportunity to share because of the internet. They interpret your friendliness and behavior differently than what you mean it to be interpreted. Many of us watched 'Will & Grace'. Jack was the 'funny' one. What made Jack funny was that he didn't think before he spoke or acted. He didn't apply any 'filter' to his thoughts or his words. This is one of those stereotypes that the straight world has picked up on. We say stuff to be funny or to shock our audience and don't even think about the effect it may have on our personal lives, or the bigger picture. 'Personally' you might stop being invited to be around this group of people. On a larger scale, these people you're around, or their friends, may think twice about being friendly with gay people due to their anti-social behaviors. Is it fair? No. Is it reality? Yes.
In seeing the pics from this video I don't get anything out of it. If this actor is gay, I don't get how he can bring himself to do this. Was he really that hard up that he had to do this? Go work at store or bus some tables or serve drinks at a bar. Their is dignity in work. Their is no dignity in what he's doing here. Don't sell your soul for a few bucks. Nothing good can come of it. I've read about Jack Wrangler and I found his story very disturbing when I read about him as a teenager in a story in People Magazine (sometime in the late 80s). Not fully understanding or being secure in my homosexuality as a teenager in the not-so-gay-friendly 80s, this former gay pornstar's story: Marrying a woman at the height of his porn career, crossing over and acting in straight porn; contributed to my confusion concerning my future as a homosexual. In the age of HIV I don't understand why women would find it to be a 'turn on' to 'bag' a gay man. I've seen porn titles out there like 'Bisexual Bareback'. I think it would only be justice if the women who involve themselves in these scenarios would come down with HIV. Remember, their [the porn industry's] special HIV testing isn't fail-proof either. I think if a number of women who knowingly and recklessly slept with gay men came down with HIV, and it was publicized, it would contribute to the 'de-romanticizing' of straight women 'bagging' a gay guy.

Posted by: Stan at August 29, 2009 8:03 AM

EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW....
Arpad died for me ... FUCK!

Posted by: lucas at August 30, 2009 1:15 PM

I personally think straight sex is thoroughly unappealing but, to each his own.

I will say (in a very definite tone) that all this "for pay" stuff is utter bullshit. If you are able to have sex with both men and women, then you are BISEXUAL. You're not "a little" gay or "straight and curious" -- you're BISEXUAL! Just deal with it!

I'm SO tired of hearing nelly little twinks talk about how they're "like, totally gay" and then, in the next breath, see some cheap whore on television and shout "I'd, like totally fuck her!" Conversely, these silly Sean Cody meat pies who get fucked up the ass repeated and then go on and on about "fucking their girlfriends" are equally absurd.

Being bisexual is a perfectly legitimate mode of sexual expression but this not wanting to identify as entirely gay speaks of some SERIOUS self-loathing in the gay community.

It'd be merely sad if it weren't also so urgent.

Wake up -- gay, straight, or bisexual, stop being afraid to BE what you ARE!

Posted by: Sigh_of_the_Times at September 1, 2009 1:11 PM

I totally agree, but I doubt that will happen Sigh_of_the_Times, there is just too much money to be made from self-loathing internalized homophobia.

Posted by: at September 2, 2009 7:22 AM

...this is fucking sick.
...this is GAY PORN.
Not bullshit.

...
xD

-Rene

Posted by: Rene at September 4, 2009 7:58 PM

You are a bunch of phony, sanctimonious, whiny queens. Only a total airhead gets their politics from porn. Arpad hurt no one by fucking this woman. It was no less a job than his being assigned with have a scene with another man (who he didn't know beforehand.) You do know that this is all staged, right? It isn't as if he wasn't wearing a "I converted" t-shirt while he banged this broad. Quit acting like he betrayed you. He didn't. Being gay isn't all about where you stick your dick, it's as much (if not more) about your spiritual connection to the other men. If Arpad can only give his heart to a man, then he can fuck a thousand women and it wouldn't make him any less gay.

Why is it that 'fluid' sexuality is welcomed amongst gay men when it comes to straight men "experimenting" with gay sex...but a gay man who experiments with straight sex is somehow a sellout to the gay community. Shut the fuck up, you hypocrites. Oh, and as far as the bellyaching about condomless sex, and how mainstream gay porn models wouldn't dare have sex without a condom with other men (while this on the other hand is allowed), apparently some of you aren't familiar with Jake Cruise's work. Leo Giamani has barebacked with guys numerous times at the same damn site. So kill that noise.

No man who is comfortable with their sexuality will be offended by someone elses; you all sound equally as moronic as those heterosexuals who claim gay sex is disgusting. Wanna know what *I* think? I think many of you are envious. I think part of you wishes you could be like Arpad or Blake, and equally as in control of your sexuality to be able to have broader experiences that *could* include women, and still maintain predominate gay status. But most of you probably can't, and therefore are annoyed when you see other guys who can.

Posted by: Ace at September 8, 2009 11:17 AM

Yes Ace, I hope Arpad can remember that and find some comfort in that when, in a few months time, he is mopping out the toilettes at Burger King.

Posted by: at September 9, 2009 11:18 AM

Ace,

As far as I can tell, the only sanctimonious person who has posted on this thread is YOU. Wanna know what *I* think? If you can't be decent enough to respect differing opinions on this subject, then perhaps you are the one who, in your own words, should "shut the fuck up."

Posted by: MMDD at September 9, 2009 3:43 PM

Now I hate 10% more Jake Cruise.

This shit really sucks.-

Posted by: La Chunga at September 17, 2009 7:15 AM

Don't some of you get it, doing what he (Arpad) did makes it look like he has pulled a Whitney Houston! After marrying Bobby fans have slowly crept away from her but once the drug thing became public knowledge there was nothing that kept them from running as far away from her as possible. Whitney was a creation (of Clive Davis and Arista) just as Arpad was a creation of the gay porn industry and once you've got an audience buying into that gold mine why the sh** would you alter a single ingredient of the forumla and risk losing that fan base and the old mighty dollar that comes with them?
Despite her much publicized interview with Oprah a lot of former Whitney fans are still avoiding her like the AIDS virus and for those people they've elected to not buy the "load" that she is shoveling. In other words, you shatter the illusion, you burst the bubble and that bubble can never be whole again.

Posted by: Me at September 28, 2009 1:08 PM

Stan: Why do you make it seem that HIV can only be transferred by a gay man? You think it would be justice for someone to contract HIV? Such a cold, heartless ****!

Posted by: Tim Buck at September 29, 2009 5:33 PM

If a well known straight porn actor fucked a guy for a movie how many of you would be condeming him in the same language you are with Arpad?
I bet very few of you!
You say being gay is as normal and exceptable as being straight, but you think that some people are far more equal than others.
You are right though about safe sex. Not using a condom with casual partners is stupid.

Face it, You have far far less problem with a straight guy fucking a man in a gay movie than a gay man fucking a woman.
Sorry but alot of you are hypocrites.

Posted by: matt at October 10, 2009 11:58 AM

The real issue with gay guys (that are out and open and 100% gay) going "straight" is that its the largest argument by the right that gay guys just need the right girl. This is "proof" that gay guys can go "straight". The people on the right don't give a damn if he enjoyed himself or not they just care that he could do it.

Posted by: tdx3fan at October 15, 2009 6:12 PM

A lot of you are bitter, self-loathing queens. Hypocrisy must be your middle name. You disdain Arpad fucking a woman yet you salivate over straight guys who fuck gay guys in gay porn movies. If hypocrisy was a piece of architecture, yours would be the Eiffel Tower.

Maybe your real problem is that you hate women. You came out of a cunt, you should at least appreciate its value.

Posted by: jason at October 23, 2009 2:37 AM

If a gay guy has sex with a woman, it simply proves that he's actually bisexual. Even if a guy is 5% hetero and 95% homo, he might call himself gay but he is still capable of fucking women. His enthusiasm for women may be less than that for guys but he can still fuck a woman to whom he is attracted.

So get out of your gay/straight divisions, guys. Human sexuality is generally not split down the middle like this.

Posted by: jason at October 23, 2009 2:39 AM

He's very hot fucking a woman!! Next should be Marco Blaze.

Posted by: Cecil at January 22, 2010 5:39 AM

well if he want at least do *straight* porn while his obviusly gay why wouldnt he do it with Buck Angel lolz

Posted by: nonoyes at April 19, 2010 9:37 AM
Post a comment and live in gay porn infamy









Remember personal info?






**NEW** Free Gay Clips Daily!


















Free-Speech-coalition-membership.gif

Recent Entries
Category Archives
syndicate