June 6, 2008
Gay Porn Before and After: Victor Steele
I first met Victor Steele last summer, on the set of GRUNTS (left). He was just back from Iraq, had an amazingly low body fat percentage and would debate which designer sunglasses (he'd brought several pairs, despite the fact that we were in the middle of nowhere) he'd wear each day. I'm sure I was charmed.
We got word earlier this week that he'd done a shoot for Playgirl in the NY Meatpacking District loft that was originally used as a set for the controversial Al Pacino gay sex movie, Cruising, and that he'd picked up more than a few style tips from the era. Pics after the jump.
Truth be told, the vet is pulling a little bit of Travis Bickle, too. (In an unrelated note, one of his co-stars in GRUNTS was named Rambo. Perhaps we'll be seeing Porn on the Fourth of July sometime soon?)
-- Mike
Related:
-- Victor Steele Goes Cruising In Old Pacino Loft (TheSword.com)
-- On the Set of Raging Stallion's GRUNTS
Posted in: GRUNTS, playgirl, Victor Steele
I love him, he has that real man look. I'd suck, and lick him all night.
Posted by: dlg at June 6, 2008 1:23 PMI'm glad to see porn stars with hair again, so tired of the crew cut look.
Posted by: scaramouche at June 6, 2008 8:52 PMMy oh my. He looks like two different people! Amazing what hair does to change one's image. He is scorchin' hot, short hair or long. Have nothing else to say, must take a cold shower now.
Posted by: Will at June 6, 2008 9:32 PMWhat the hell happened? The hair makes him look like a meth head. I cant believe that picture would be in playgirl.
I always hate these "before and after" articles you guys do. Some of them are disturbing and offensive for some models.
Why dont you guys do a before and after on Damien Cross?
What are you talking about? I think he looks way hotter now. If you think the models look worse after, that's totally fine. But thisn't a post that's mocking him at all.
Posted by: Mike at June 7, 2008 4:16 PMStill has a nice body but I much prefer the 'before' version.
Posted by: T Bird at June 7, 2008 8:10 PMHe looked better before.
Posted by: at June 8, 2008 1:36 AMHe still has a good body in the Playgirl shoot and I like his hair, both head and facial. But he looks tired or haggered which makes him look like he's strung out on something. Or maybe he is strung out on something.
Posted by: jboy at June 8, 2008 11:28 AMWow he looks so different. Can't work out which one I prefer, they're both so hot.
Posted by: EuroboyFilms at June 9, 2008 9:47 AMI agree with the 1st Mike, he does look bad. Its not the hair either, the jbf (just been fucked) hair is usually hot.
Posted by: derrick at June 9, 2008 5:26 PMThe only thing that bothers my about the after is his underwear!
I mean, gray? really? why not just stretch a hefty bag over the pelvic area?
Anyway other than that, he looks great.
Posted by: Ross at June 10, 2008 12:12 AMare they the same person? the second one looks worse
Posted by: Caelus at June 10, 2008 3:10 AMOmg, fuck yeah he's way hotter in the after picture. I really like men with hair. GET AT ME WITH PICS. faqhunter69@yahoo.com
Posted by: toddpsa at June 10, 2008 11:41 AMOmg, fuck yeah he's way hotter in the after picture. I really like men with hair. GET AT ME WITH PICS. faqhunter69@yahoo.com
Posted by: toddpsa at June 10, 2008 11:41 AMOmg, fuck yeah he's way hotter in the after picture. I really like men with hair. GET AT ME WITH PICS. faqhunter69@yahoo.com
Posted by: toddpsa at June 10, 2008 11:56 AMA gay porn star strung out on something??? No, that couldn't be!
Posted by: Simon at June 10, 2008 11:59 AMI disagree with some other posters - I love the crew cut look. It's hot. His hair looks like a mess.
If I want long hair I'll do a girl - well no I won't but its the idea.
Posted by: ChicagoCub at June 10, 2008 2:54 PMthis picture at least looks gorgeous to me
Posted by: Ass Freak at June 11, 2008 2:42 AMInteresting... He looks relatively the same except someone put an old man's tupee on his head before taking the picture... Plus those dark circles could use a little help.
Posted by: Chuck at June 11, 2008 8:51 PMI guess they didn't have shampoo in the 1970s.
Posted by: at June 12, 2008 2:38 AM
